Just jumping in here, The creator of Evangelion (a show full of depth... supposedly, couldn't get past the 5th episode) has gone onto say that there is ultimatley nothing he intended to say with the show, that any sort of symbolism that the show has was constructed by the fans. So who's to say there is absolutley zero depth in any creation?ItouKaiji said:Pffffthahahaha, no. Gurren Lagann was a lot of fun things but it was shallow as hell. There was no substance there other than a bunch of half baked overblown idealism. The show was fun to be sure and it was very much a sugar rush to watch, but to say it had some depth is just silly.Dansen said:Well I hope you can at least admit that show had some depth and substance, compared to none at all.Casual Shinji said:Well, just because the show points at itself and goes "Look how skeezy this is, ain't it dumb", doesn't make it any less skeezy.
The whole design is super fetishizing and in no way meant to deter the audience from salivating over it. Which is fine, but don't try to apply some point to it, because there isn't any.
It's trying have its cake and eat it.
As for the show itself... There's definately talent on display here, it's just a shame it's all spent on crazy for the sake of crazy. But then I'm not a fan at all of the most badass awesome show ever, Gurren Lagann.
There's only two episodes of Kill la Kill but it's looking to be the same kind of turn your brain off and have a good time kind of anime. The second episode was a huge improvement over the first because it fixed the insane pacing of the first episode. Also, I like that the fanservice went both ways with the stripping teacher, that was pretty funny.
And what is a show that you have to have your brain on to watch (just for sake of curiosity)? The only thing I can think of from the top of my head is Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex, you have to be proper switch on for that shit.