mrhappyface said:
Angerwing said:
But that's the problem. In recent times, US soldiers HAVEN'T been used for the defence of their home country. I have nothing against the soldiers themselves, and would think much higher if they WERE defending the country, but as it stands, most of the time they're just 'liberating' countries.
To clarify though, that isn't the soldier's fault, and I have no disrespect for them.
If the war ever reaches home, we'll be in a world of shit. So we root out potential threats before they can attack. The best defense is a good offense.
Vietnam: Misplaced fears over Communism. America wasn't under threat. They just hated Communism.
Lebanon: America intervening to help people sympathetic to their world view.
Grenada: No real reason to intervene. America felt like it.
Beirut: American led UN intervention.
Panama: Team America: World Police.
Gulf War: Again, 'liberation'.
Somalia: Peacekeeping.
Kosovo/Yugoslavia: Interventionism.
War on Terrorism: Defending America. Legit.
- Afghanistan: Mostly ending the Taliban reign, but since they're linked to al-Qaida, I'll concede that one.
- Philippines: Invited by government to end terrorists.
Liberia: Used military force to strong-arm a man out of there.
Iraq: Pure interventionism.
In almost all of these examples, America was
never at risk . Most of it is America sticking their nose in other people's business. I understand that if war gets to America, that would be BAD, but don't kid yourself in saying that all these examples are to defend America. Because that's just not true in the slightest.