I'm wondering out loud here, but is it still homophobia if you're turned off by the sight of homosexuality? It's not like you get to choose what arouses you and what doesn't.
Ehm, no, that's not homophobia, neither is telling a same-sex couple to "get a room".Johnny Novgorod said:I'm wondering out loud here, but is it still homophobia if you're turned off by the sight of homosexuality? It's not like you get to choose what arouses you and what doesn't.
While i'm not into anal sex i'd still prefer to stick it in a woman's butt than a dude. (just like i'd rather have a woman's tongue in my mouth rather than a man's)Vegosiux said:Ehm, no, that's not homophobia, neither is telling a same-sex couple to "get a room".Johnny Novgorod said:I'm wondering out loud here, but is it still homophobia if you're turned off by the sight of homosexuality? It's not like you get to choose what arouses you and what doesn't.
What I am more interested in is this odd phenomenon of manly men going all ballistic about gays yet still complaining their wife won't let them put it in the butt.
I think it's been touched on multiple times, it's putting yourself in someone else's shoes. "That is something I would not want to do and thus I would prefer not to see it."Vegosiux said:Ehm, no, that's not homophobia, neither is telling a same-sex couple to "get a room".Johnny Novgorod said:I'm wondering out loud here, but is it still homophobia if you're turned off by the sight of homosexuality? It's not like you get to choose what arouses you and what doesn't.
What I am more interested in is this odd phenomenon of manly men going all ballistic about gays yet still complaining their wife won't let them put it in the butt.
Great post. This is a lot of it.itsthesheppy said:I think the phenomena of having nothing ethically wrong with homosexuality and yet being disgusted by it has to do with the 'mirror neurons' we all come equipped with. The same neurons that makes your skin crawl when you see a spider crawling up someone else's arm. It's not on your arm and yet you can almost feel it there, inching it way up...
When heterosexual men see two women kissing, their mirror neurons put them in the place of one of the two women; and since they are heterosexual and find women attractive, they are therefor having a heterosexual experience; imagining themselves kissing a girl. However, with the male couple, their mirror neurons are imagining themselves kissing a man, and since they are not homosexual, the idea is repellent for some.
That would explain why you consciously have no problem with homosexuals but a subconsciously repulsed by seeing them be romantic with each other. Your mind is inserting yourself into the mix and making you imagine that it's you. Fun when it's girls involved, not so fun with guys. You just need to learn to recognize that and control it so that it doesn't bother you. It's just down to personal discipline.
I get it, I was just saying that they're wrong. Nothing more, nothing less.SmashLovesTitanQuest said:What part of "according to the NPD" do you not understand? Is English not your native language? Should I link you to google translator?
Contracts that are recognized by some parties and not by other parties. Contracts that have value in one state and not in another state. Or contracts that have value in one district, yet not the other.Such as?
OK, cool."To a point" means I'm covering my ass, because you know somewhere on this website there's someone that would quote me and rant on about how being able to love openly without limits means soon we'll have two men fucking on the sidewalk in front of a school.
"To a point" means the same point heterosexual couples can't cross in public. Nothing more, nothing less.
I admit I'm pretty abrasive. I'm straight forward. I'm also pretty tired so I'm not thinking totally straight. I apologize. I can be less gawkish.Well, by the looks of it, I'm not the only one seeing this in your posts, so whatever...
When both generate the same reaction/feeling it doesn't matter.101flyboy said:There is a difference between "this does not compute" and "this is disgusting".
Homosexuality is only realised at point of fornication? Sorry, that's absurd.Also kissing/hugging isn't really homosexuality. Homosexuality is sex. Kissing is a kiss. Hugging is hugging. Hand holding is hand holding.
I am more than happy having different levels of affection being shown towards others. Are you saying that a boob grab isn't sexual because no sex is involved? Or maybe grabbing a man's crotch as a form of greeting? Is the line only drawn at penetration?Same-sex hand holding, opposite sex kissing, it's the same thing with different gender combinations. We need to separate affection from sex. I'm not turned on or off by a man and woman kissing. It's a non-starter. Thinking it's disgusting is taking it to a different level.
Don't let people like this guy (sorry, Rebellion dude, just using you as an example) tell you you're sick and wrong. I mean, going by their logic, he's sick for not accepting you. That idealism is a very vicious circle. "You're sick because you don't like this." "Well, you're sick because you don't like that I don't like this." Well, ffffffuck that. What are you supposed to do? You, I and many others in this world have grown up with and taught by people who truly are homophobic, racist, sexist, etc and I think we do pretty well considering. So... Yeah, that was a rant and a half, right?Tragedy said:snip
It matters. One reaction is of indifference. The other is a negative response. People should strive for indifference, because if you find nothing wrong with homosexuality at all, then you shouldn't have a problem with same-sex couples showing low/moderate levels of affection, the same way opposite-sex couples do. If you do have a problem with that then you subconsciously have internalized issues that you're projecting on an innocent action.Abomination said:When both generate the same reaction/feeling it doesn't matter.
Homosexuality is an extension of the word homosexual, which is characterized as a sexual desire for the same-sex. Homosexuality is the actions and state of being of that desire. That's why people don't identify as homosexuals, we identify as gay, because homosexual doesn't fully encapsulate a persons' sexual orientation.Homosexuality is only realised at point of fornication? Sorry, that's absurd.
All of those actions are sexual. But we're not discussing sexualized actions. I'd be caught off guard having someone grab my crotch when they greet me. Or seeing a coworker touch a woman's boobs when they meet. But we're talking about low to moderate levels of affection. So why do you keep jumping to sex and these aggressive acts? It's like that's where you put same-sex affection, you consider it in the same realm as touching someone's boobs. And that speaks to the internalized issues you have towards homosexuality.I am more than happy having different levels of affection being shown towards others. Are you saying that a boob grab isn't sexual because no sex is involved? Or maybe grabbing a man's crotch as a form of greeting? Is the line only drawn at penetration?
You keep repeating this and I continue shooting it down easily. You don't like to see an unattractive girl kissing a man because she is unattractive. Which is a quantifiable reason to not want to see someone kissing. That is taste. Not wanting to see a man kiss has nothing to do with your taste. It's because you're straight.I do not like watching a man kiss an ugly girl the same as I do not like watching a man kiss a man.I find it unattractive because I am not attracted to ugly women or men.
It actually does, which is what most people are saying. It is homophobia. And it doesn't mean you're are definitively a homophobe. But your stance is inconsistent. And it's inconsistent due to homophobia and the fact you can't seem to help but connect same-sex kissing to sexual activity.This is not homophobic, this is personal tastes. Just because a homosexual person doesn't find heterosexual couples kissing unattractive does not make my stance homophobic.
Yeah, so basically, homosexuality isn't natural. That's what you're implying, right? Seems like it. Maybe you meant it that way, maybe not, but when we get down to it, that's more or less what a majority of people are subconsciously thinking when they protest same-sex kissing. And it is a homophobic mentality.I am certain the reason it is not disgusting to most homosexuals is either because it is simply a social norm or because it is kind of the way how people are made... unless homosexuals are somehow able to spawn children from their pairing since last I looked.
From your posts, it seems like you think the OP and people like him should feel bad for the feelings they have towards this. Really, I think it's perfectly fine. You can't change who you are and how you react to it. If he's not taking time out of his day to disrupt homosexual love, he's a perfectly healthy individual.101flyboy said:Homophobia is not just fear, it's an irrational aversion and hatred/discrimination. It's bias, it's the "I accept homosexuality as long as they're way over there" mentality. It's outright hatred. It displays itself in many different ways with different people. What studies show is homophobia is generally based on insecurity and insecurity is a fear based trait. You may not be directly scared of homosexuality. Or of gay people. But homophobes have a wall up with gay people. And they are scared of breaking that wall because they have internalized issues with homosexuality they can't deal with. They then project those issues on homosexuality rather than addressing their own issues. That's why homophobia is dying yet still a severe problem. It's *completely* irrational. It's completely based on abstract feelings, not logic. More so than racism or misogyny.
It doesn't work that way. The difference is you (people with homophobic tendencies, not you specifically) dislike and are disgusted by something which is ultimately positive, namely love between people, and something they CAN'T change. While you preach tolerance for the intolerant which is completely absurd and wrong.ninjaRiv said:another snip .
But he's not being intolerant. He's simply reacting.Tragedy said:It doesn't work that way. The difference is you (people with homophobic tendencies, not you specifically) dislike and are disgusted by something which is ultimately positive, namely love between people, and something they CAN'T change. While you preach tolerance for the intolerant which is completely absurd and wrong.ninjaRiv said:another snip .
And as we mentioned countless times it is enough to hide your true homophobic, racist or sexist thoughts for other people. That is not what is ultimately discussed here, the OP specifically asked if his situation makes him a homophobe and it DOES. It is up to him or you to do whatever you want with that information - you can still live in the dark ages with all the scary and gross gays around or you can truly be an enlightened person who holds no irrational aversions and in the end being a more secure and confident individual.
That is all we have been trying to say.
It isn't cool. That's just how it is. It doesn't mean you're a bad person for thinking this way, it doesn't mean you're anti-gay, but is it *cool* to believe more or less the love two people have for one another of the same-gender is disgusting? No. It is not cool. If you don't impose said view on gay couples, that's good. You don't deserve a medal for that. We should all strive to be the best we can be and that means striving to eliminate irrational biases we have. Ultimately you won't be as close to these gay friends you have as you could be because you have a wall up and that wall isn't necessary.ninjaRiv said:Don't pay any attention to the people here saying it's not cool.
Don't let people like this guy (sorry, Rebellion dude, just using you as an example) tell you you're sick and wrong. I mean, going by their logic, he's sick for not accepting you.Wow. Hahaha. That brought a laugh.
Why should people accept irrational negative biases if they aren't irrational, and don't have negative biases? They are the ones that people such as your friend and the OP should strive to be like. There are no two sides to this coin. There is a reasonable way to look at things and an unreasonable way to look at things, and you're being unreasonable and being pretty aggressive in justifying yourself. When like 10-12 people are saying the same exact thing then maybe it's not them with the issue..........it's you.
No-one has used the word sick. You're too defensive. You seem offended for being called out (theoretically speaking) on something that other people have no issue with. It's not an attack on someone's character to call something out for what it is. For highlighting one aspect of your train of thought and showing you why that train of thought is irrational. It's not calling you a bad, sick person.That idealism is a very vicious circle. "You're sick because you don't like this." "Well, you're sick because you don't like that I don't like this." Well, ffffffuck that. What are you supposed to do? You, I and many others in this world have grown up with and taught by people who truly are homophobic, racist, sexist, etc and I think we do pretty well considering. So... Yeah, that was a rant and a half, right?
What are we supposed to do? Take responsibility for our problems and do our part to overcome them rather than make excuses for them. Excuse making and deflection is the easy way out. And if anything is offensive, that is. Because it shows a person has no willingness to better yourself, and it's a slap in the face really to those that DO make the attempt and are successful. Instead of being defensive, be realistic. Defensiveness usually solves nothing.
The thing is, that several people in this very thread have said they have changed. I personally have changed. I was personally uncomfortable with same-sex affection when I was younger and I grew out of it. I personally know people who were EXTREMELY uncomfortable with it who grew out of that discomfort in college. That's a cop out. We can understand, work on and fix our biases, if we're willing to address them and work on them, repress them. The issue is that some here are more or less saying they don't care about working on them, or they don't want to work on them, because they don't find their negative biases bad. Although they are. Just because they aren't imposed on a gay couple doesn't mean it's not negative to have negative bias towards same-sex couples for being same-sex couples. That's not perfectly healthy. Perfectly healthy would be not having such biases in the first place. Non-perfection would be having low-level bias or bias that you're controlling and repressing and growing.Shadowstar38 said:From your posts, it seems like you think the OP and people like him should feel bad for the feelings they have towards this. Really, I think it's perfectly fine. You can't change who you are and how you react to it. If he's not taking time out of his day to disrupt homosexual love, he's a perfectly healthy individual.
101flyboy said:It isn't cool. That's just how it is. It doesn't mean you're a bad person for thinking this way, it doesn't mean you're anti-gay, but is it *cool* to believe more or less the love two people have for one another of the same-gender is disgusting? No. It is not cool. If you don't impose said view on gay couples, that's good. You don't deserve a medal for that. We should all strive to be the best we can be and that means striving to eliminate irrational biases we have. Ultimately you won't be as close to these gay friends you have as you could be because you have a wall up and that wall isn't necessary.ninjaRiv said:Don't pay any attention to the people here saying it's not cool.
Don't let people like this guy (sorry, Rebellion dude, just using you as an example) tell you you're sick and wrong. I mean, going by their logic, he's sick for not accepting you.Oh, I'm... PRETTY close to this gay friend, man.Wow. Hahaha. That brought a laugh.
Why should people accept irrational negative biases if they aren't irrational, and don't have negative biases? They are the ones that people such as your friend and the OP should strive to be like. There are no two sides to this coin. There is a reasonable way to look at things and an unreasonable way to look at things, and you're being unreasonable and being pretty aggressive in justifying yourself. When like 10-12 people are saying the same exact thing then maybe it's not them with the issue..........it's you.
No-one has used the word sick. You're too defensive. You seem offended for being called out on something that other people have no issue with. It's not an attack on your character to call something out for what it is. For highlighting one aspect of your train of thought and showing you why that train of thought is irrational. It's not calling you a bad, sick person.That idealism is a very vicious circle. "You're sick because you don't like this." "Well, you're sick because you don't like that I don't like this." Well, ffffffuck that. What are you supposed to do? You, I and many others in this world have grown up with and taught by people who truly are homophobic, racist, sexist, etc and I think we do pretty well considering. So... Yeah, that was a rant and a half, right?
What are we supposed to do? Take responsibility for our problems and do our part to overcome them rather than make excuses for them. Excuse making and deflection is the easy way out. And if anything is offensive, that is. Because it shows you have no willingness to better yourself, and it's a slap in the face really to those that DO make the attempt and are successful. Instead of being defensive, be realistic. Defensiveness usually solves nothing.
Actually, That Rebellion fella said sickening. That's what I picked up on.
Anyway, I see your point but I disagree. Striving to be the best you can be doesn't mean you need to change this shit. People can be disgusted by two guys kissing. If he told them they shouldn't be doing that or if he thought it's morally wrong, then he would be a bit shit as a person. Then I'd say he needs to look at his way of thinking. I just think it's nowhere near a big deal if it's a turn off for him. But he wasn't talking about the love, he was talking about the actual kissing. Personally I hate public displays of affection of any kind. Fuck that.
You made good points, but Aaron wasn't discussing sex. He was talking about mere inferences that two men like each other. And basic affection between two guys. If he were talking about sexual activity, that would be a different ballgame. If he said "I don't like seeing two men stick their tongues down each other's throat", that's one thing. Effectively saying male-male homosexuality is completely disgusting to the point you want to have a seizure is.........homophobia. You can have homophobia yet not be homophobic or anti-gay.Fdzzaigl said:Well, I wouldn't call you "homophobic" OP. I can see where you're coming from and though I wouldn't say that seeing sexual acts between two men disgusts me, it is not something I find appealing or even something that I prefer to see either. That's simply because, like you, I'm heterosexual and my preferences lie elsewhere.
It's also why lesbians intermingled as such are appealing to me: they're still women engaging in sexual activities, loose of the fact that they're lesbian they still appeal to me because they're women.
For me, "homophobic" means that you have certain prejudices or fears regarding homosexual relationships, it has nothing to do with actually being interested in the sexual aspect of those relationships or not yourself. For example, I would classify someone claiming that homosexuals are "a danger to society" or "a perversion of the normal man-women relationship" as homophobic.
I don't really mind if they have the bias as long as they're not being dicks about it. It's only natural to feel uncomfortable when you see homosexuals displaying affection. It looks unnatural. Being at a "tolerance" level is the most acceptable thing I could ask for.101flyboy said:The thing is, that several people in this very thread have said they have changed. I personally have changed. I was personally uncomfortable with same-sex affection when I was younger and I grew out of it. I personally know people who were EXTREMELY uncomfortable with it who grew out of that discomfort in college. That's a cop out. We can understand, work on and fix our biases, if we're willing to address them and work on them, repress them. The issue is that some here are more or less saying they don't care about working on them, or they don't want to work on them, because they don't find their negative biases bad. Although they are. Just because they aren't imposed on a gay couple doesn't mean it's not negative to have negative bias towards same-sex couples for being same-sex couples. That's not perfectly healthy. Perfectly healthy would be not having such biases in the first place. Non-perfection would be having low-level bias or bias that you're controlling and repressing and growing.Shadowstar38 said:From your posts, it seems like you think the OP and people like him should feel bad for the feelings they have towards this. Really, I think it's perfectly fine. You can't change who you are and how you react to it. If he's not taking time out of his day to disrupt homosexual love, he's a perfectly healthy individual.
Simply having a bias and then throwing your hands up and saying "oh well" is not perfectly healthy. Does it make that person a bad person? Not at all. It means they have a negative thought process they should seek to eliminate or soften. So that they *can* be completely comfortable around their gay friends.