High five.Ekonk said:Holy fucking shit, high to the five brother, EXACTLY the fucking same. ADHD, and also the 132. Or was it 138? I dunno, it was a long time ago so it isn't valid anymore anyway. But still, HIGH FIVE.Palademon said:I took mine at A REAL PLACE; a leanring assessment centre, because of my ADHD.
Mine is 132
No nothing like that, but when it comes to math, as soon as I have to start thinking about it I stop. Don't know why, but I do. I've never had that problem in Science, English... anything else really, but I hate math, I always have, and I always will.Monkeyman8 said:4th percentile? do you have dyscalculia or something.Darius Brogan said:Ah ,I see, my test didn't place an average on IQ, just gave me a number. My personal highest percentile was 98th in passage comprehension.Monkeyman8 said:99th percentile average, I'll dig it up for specifics tomorrow. it was like 99.8th, 99th, 50th percentiles. lowest being in processing speedDarius Brogan said:99th percentile in what? Normal IQ tests are done in sections then, I believe, calculated to an average. The percentiles assigned are to each of the sections of the test, not to the completed work.Monkeyman8 said:99th percentile, that's all that matters
My second highest, curiously enough, was 92nd... in processing speed...
Although my lowest was 4th, in math, but I hate math anyways so I don't really care.
Are you sure you don't have dyscalculia? It's as common as dyslexia but few people give it any thought. I'm quite convinced I have it in some form. I'm not good at math though not generally bad with numbers, I have made my own -/+ system to combat have trouble telling left from right and I'm bad at remembering names and faces. All common symptoms of dyscalculia. I have never been tested and I don't know any where I could get tested either. But a lot of people live with it without knowing.Darius Brogan said:No nothing like that, but when it comes to math, as soon as I have to start thinking about it I stop. Don't know why, but I do. I've never had that problem in Science, English... anything else really, but I hate math, I always have, and I always will.Monkeyman8 said:4th percentile? do you have dyscalculia or something.Darius Brogan said:Ah ,I see, my test didn't place an average on IQ, just gave me a number. My personal highest percentile was 98th in passage comprehension.Monkeyman8 said:99th percentile average, I'll dig it up for specifics tomorrow. it was like 99.8th, 99th, 50th percentiles. lowest being in processing speedDarius Brogan said:99th percentile in what? Normal IQ tests are done in sections then, I believe, calculated to an average. The percentiles assigned are to each of the sections of the test, not to the completed work.Monkeyman8 said:99th percentile, that's all that matters
My second highest, curiously enough, was 92nd... in processing speed...
Although my lowest was 4th, in math, but I hate math anyways so I don't really care.
That you have the potential to become the best secretary in Ireland?HerrBobo said:I did one at school about 14 years ago. It was one that everone in 4th year of school takes in Ireland, or at least they did at the time. I got in the top 1% in the contry in clerical speed and accuracy.
You know what that means????
IQ tests are essentially bullshit.AndyFromMonday said:Hail the Hawking!RhombusHatesYou said:Dr Hawking says people who boast about their IQs are losers. [http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/12/magazine/12QUESTIONS.html?_r=1]
OT: Apparently this entire site is made up of either geniuses or people who are close to becoming geniuses. Either they're all lying, IQ tests are bullshit or we have an undiscovered gold mine of Einsteins.
As I've said before in this thread, IQ tests do not determine your intelligence, they determine how good you are at IQ tests just like how exams do not determine how good you are at a subject but how good you are at taking exams.RhombusHatesYou said:IQ tests are essentially bullshit.AndyFromMonday said:Hail the Hawking!RhombusHatesYou said:Dr Hawking says people who boast about their IQs are losers. [http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/12/magazine/12QUESTIONS.html?_r=1]
OT: Apparently this entire site is made up of either geniuses or people who are close to becoming geniuses. Either they're all lying, IQ tests are bullshit or we have an undiscovered gold mine of Einsteins.
They still serve some purpose used as an assessment tool but beyond that... they're mostly just a number that people can use to validate their self-worth.
That's true as far as that goes and they certainly don't measure intelligence.AndyFromMonday said:As I've said before in this thread, IQ tests do not determine your intelligence, they determine how good you are at IQ tests
I agree that IQ tests do have their uses. However, I disagree with it as a use to determine intelligence which is what, at least here, it was used for. In 5th grade I had to take an IQ test. I got a 95 which was the average of the class. After this test not only were kids who got a higher score start bragging about it, they also started to consider themselves more intelligent and as such conflicts started. "I'm better than you because my IQ is higher". This is one of the reasons why I hate IQ tests (due to the "division" they create) and this is why I also hate IQ tests being administered to children since at such a young age they might not understand what an IQ test is used to determine.RhombusHatesYou said:That's true as far as that goes and they certainly don't measure intelligence.AndyFromMonday said:As I've said before in this thread, IQ tests do not determine your intelligence, they determine how good you are at IQ tests
However, like what the original Binet-Simon test was designed for, they are still somewhat useful as a tool to help identifying learning difficulties or disorders (especially in children). In employment rehab systems (rehabilitating people who have been out the workforce for extended periods of time due to medical reasons to help them re-enter employment), along with aptitude tests, they form a basis for designing a person rehab scheme... but in both cases it's not like they just look at the final scores and go "righto, this is the case..." they have to actually sit down and analyse the entire testing set to get their indicators.
Well, I was gonna say it means "fuck all", but I think I like yours better.RhombusHatesYou said:That you have the potential to become the best secretary in Ireland?HerrBobo said:I did one at school about 14 years ago. It was one that everone in 4th year of school takes in Ireland, or at least they did at the time. I got in the top 1% in the contry in clerical speed and accuracy.
You know what that means????
Yeah, I've never been in favour of telling kids the results of IQ tests because, as most people can tell you, children are evil little shits when you give them anything they could use as a rationale to thinking they're better than other kids.AndyFromMonday said:I agree that IQ tests do have their uses. However, I disagree with it as a use to determine intelligence which is what, at least here, it was used for. In 5th grade I had to take an IQ test. I got a 95 which was the average of the class. After this test not only were kids who got a higher score start bragging about it, they also started to consider themselves more intelligent and as such conflicts started. "I'm better than you because my IQ is higher". This is one of the reasons why I hate IQ tests (due to the "division" they create) and this is why I also hate IQ tests being administered to children since at such a young age they might not understand what an IQ test is used to determine.RhombusHatesYou said:That's true as far as that goes and they certainly don't measure intelligence.AndyFromMonday said:As I've said before in this thread, IQ tests do not determine your intelligence, they determine how good you are at IQ tests
However, like what the original Binet-Simon test was designed for, they are still somewhat useful as a tool to help identifying learning difficulties or disorders (especially in children). In employment rehab systems (rehabilitating people who have been out the workforce for extended periods of time due to medical reasons to help them re-enter employment), along with aptitude tests, they form a basis for designing a person rehab scheme... but in both cases it's not like they just look at the final scores and go "righto, this is the case..." they have to actually sit down and analyse the entire testing set to get their indicators.