Agreed.DJDarque said:The Dresden Files. I could read them all day, every day. ALL DAY, EVERY DAY.
Since you already mentioned The Dresden Files, I recommend The First Law Trilogy and spin-offs. Dark humor, flawed characters, and grisly action.
Agreed.DJDarque said:The Dresden Files. I could read them all day, every day. ALL DAY, EVERY DAY.
Now here's a hoopy frood who knows where his towel is.AlternatePFG said:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. I enjoy the entire series immensely. (Yeah, even that Eoin Colfer book. Wasn't as good but still rather entertaining)
Seconded. Or thirded. Or whatever.DJDarque said:The Dresden Files. I could read them all day, every day. ALL DAY, EVERY DAY.
Okay I really have to ask as I've read several reviews that also called it smut. And I really really don't understand.hurfdurp said:The Kushiel series. I pretty much never re-read books, but these ones, awh yea. Must be the smut.
Agreed. I was really surprised when some of my friends from high school dismissed it as "boring." I find it enthralling.Naeras said:1984 by George Orwell.
It isn't just a dystopia for me. It's the worst imaginable dystopia I could think of, and it scares the shit out of me. And it's incredible.
Have you read the annotated version?Level 7 Dragon said:The Master and Margaret, by a Russian writer Bulgacov, it's told to be a cult classic.It was banned in the Soviet union BTW.
Basically the writer was a Satan worshiper and a drug addict, also he was a professional doctor and had to work with some mentally insane people. Basically the book is the bible from the Satan's eyes. He even made Satan a positive character, honestly, best Satan I've ever seen.
The book consists of 3 story lines:
Satire of USSR in the 30's.
A story of a Cristian sidekick in 20 B.C (Basically Jesus the first)
Love of the Master and Margaret, that the death itself can not stop.
The book was wright in the 1930's, but was released to the mass public only in the 1980's.
I always found the novel strange in a certain way, like it's cursed or something.
I highly recommend reading it, it's a novel like no other.
Of course it's much more than that. A lot of things I post on here can't really be taken at face value as generally I tend to be an oaf. I'd say the more recent books have actually become even weaker in that department if anything. I wouldn't wait years on these books if it was just for a simple sprinkling of the word phallusHagi said:Okay I really have to ask as I've read several reviews that also called it smut. And I really really don't understand.hurfdurp said:The Kushiel series. I pretty much never re-read books, but these ones, awh yea. Must be the smut.
But how is it smut? I know there's some sadomasochism themes and sex scenes, but they're not that many of them and even then they're not all that explicit. Not to mention that there's so much more going on then just sex, I'd call it political intrigue any day.
Is there some sort of censored version I'm reading?
Do the later books, which I haven't read get a lot smuttier?
Are my perceptions completely skewed coming from a country where this [http://www.amazon.com/Turkish-Delight-Jan-Wolkers/dp/0714510556] is not considered smut but literature?
Well, it's a good thing I'm Russian. Anyway, there is actually a few movies made by that novel. It's best to try to find a good translation of the movie, I don't know about the English translation, but the original is quite hard to read. Try watching the movie if you want to save yourself some time.Koroviev said:Have you read the annotated version?Level 7 Dragon said:The Master and Margaret, by a Russian writer Bulgacov, it's told to be a cult classic.It was banned in the Soviet union BTW.
Basically the writer was a Satan worshiper and a drug addict, also he was a professional doctor and had to work with some mentally insane people. Basically the book is the bible from the Satan's eyes. He even made Satan a positive character, honestly, best Satan I've ever seen.
The book consists of 3 story lines:
Satire of USSR in the 30's.
A story of a Cristian sidekick in 20 B.C (Basically Jesus the first)
Love of the Master and Margaret, that the death itself can not stop.
The book was wright in the 1930's, but was released to the mass public only in the 1980's.
I always found the novel strange in a certain way, like it's cursed or something.
I highly recommend reading it, it's a novel like no other.
Also, I'd like to point out that the translation is a significant detail. The Ginsburg translation is pretty clunky.
Wasn't really directed at you personallyhurfdurp said:Of course it's much more than that. A lot of things I post on here can't really be taken at face value as generally I tend to be an oaf. I'd say the more recent books have actually become even weaker in that department if anything. I wouldn't wait years on these books if it was just for a simple sprinkling of the word phallus.