What makes the Empire in Star Wars evil?

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,952
0
0
Aris Khandr said:
Alderaan was not destroyed because the Rebels were hiding there. It was merely a demonstration to keep the other systems in line. That would be like the US blowing up all of France, just to intimidate Somalia.
No, I think a more accurate example would be the US dropping two atomic bombs killing roughly 200 thousand people in short order as a demonstration of ungodly power in order to intimidate Japan into surrendering instead of a prolonged conventional campaign that would have drug on for years and likely resulted in deaths that would number closer to the millions.
 

RedFeather1975

New member
Apr 26, 2008
78
0
0
The death star helped an entire planet's population to ascend with the most merciful of expediency.
The princess, the smuggler and the princely moisture farmer didn't think that was a profitable course of action.
Yeah, Luke was a ****ing moisture farmer! How lame and desperate of an existence is that?!

edit: Oh yeah, I forgot that the anal-retentive robot and his little potty-mouthed friend didn't like that death star saving billions either. Those two are just as lame as Luke. Moisture farmer... lmao.

http://deathstarpr.blogspot.ca/2011/10/is-luke-skywalker-really-99.html
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,952
0
0
Shanicus said:
Dude...

The Empire has a super weapon that can freeze planets solid. They've already established that they've got a weapon capable of blowing up planets, now they're just screwing around with new and different ways to commit genocide.

While the whole ideology argument might work for other stories, when you start inventing new ways to commit mass-murder on a global scale, you've officially crossed into the 'evil' side of things.

And seriously, after you blow up a planet as an example to the rest of the governments who think you're a bit of a wanker that you shouldn't be fucked with, you're not exactly presenting yourself as a good, positive Empire now, are you?
That argument falls pretty flat.

A group within the government is not satisfied about the actions of a duly elected representative government at the urging of Jedi whispering in their ears form the Rebel alliance, and begin the process of forced rebellion and secession from the government,(Wow, kinda prophetic) turning former friends and allies in a 2500 year old system of government into enemies with the rebels fixated on impeding the will of the republic to suit their own ends. This results in after waging perhaps the largest war in its history having to immediately turn around and begin defending itself against its own people.

Then years later that government struggles to put the peices of itself back together with constant failed attempts at reunification. Being large and widespread makes its actions sluggish and ineffectual to defend against the incessant guerrilla terrorist war being waged by the Rebel alliance. Knowing this prolonged siege campaign is failing, a conscious effort is made to make a demonstration of power and bring unity and peace back within reach. So Billions are sacrificed in order to save thousands of systems and billions upon trillions of lives. (Just like the aforementioned US Atomic strike strategy)

See... the reason the argument that the empire is evil ... cause genocide.... falls flat. History is written by the victor, and honestly there are really no "good" or "bad" guys with everything being colored in grey. Where are the tales of all the death and destruction caused on innocents at the hands of the Rebels in all this? How many loyalists did they destroy along the way in their fight that they justified as simply "part of the problem"

So with the Rebels winning when it is all said and done we are told their story, and their victory. However one countries victorious fight is anothers campaign of terror. Look at the facts that didnt get covered up. Most the planets in the empire were not subjugated or oppressed. And what did happen usually occurred in the pursuit of the greater goal of reunifying the galaxy. Those who retained loyalty were rewarded and given opportunity to remain as valued allies. Ewoks seemed to be doing pretty OK as did the wookies and little changed for the Hutts. But of the former everything was going good until silver tongued rebels started making promises, manipulated the simple ewoks and tricked them into betrayal.


The story is clearly biased in that respect because the victors painted history to show them to be the valiant crusaders, and that divine right was on their side. See... its all simply a matter of perspective. As I said, history is written by the victor. As this is a story from a long time ago in a galaxy far far away, of course the historical recount of the story would portray its paragons as the Virtuous Paladin, The honorable rogue cowboy, The noble savage and the stalwart princess

As I said Good is rarely good. Evil is rarely evil. Its all a matter of perspective.

LOL, damn yer hide for making me talk about Star Wars on this deep of a level... I loathe Star Wars.
 

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
hooglese said:
In the movies, the Imperials/Dark Side are a democratic republic,
Not really. They mention the senate in the first one I believe being dissolved, and the reality is that by that point the Emperor basically had full control and any democratic arm of government was fairly neutered (hence being able to simply get rid of the senate). And given the Empires tendency to stomp out any opposition under the boot heels of stormtroopers, it's unlikely there were any checks and balances in place to keep the Emperor and the Empire serving the people and not the other way around. Also, we need to keep in mind that the Empire is lead by a guy who started a galactic war, manipulated both factions involved heavily, and utilized a totally subservient clone army to seize control, and wipe out the Jedi. This is not a nice guy in charge at all.

they kept the galaxy in peace,
Enforcing peace with the business end of a blaster isn't really peace. At least, not any peace I'd want to live under.

they only blew up Alderaan because the enemy was gathering there
So, blowing up a planet which almost certainly had a population in the millions, and probably billions, because its government or some of its people support a fairly small group of rebels isn't evil? Is that a joke? Hell, they didn't even actually care if there was a substantial rebel presence there at all. They just blew it up to make a statement because it was a prominent world who's government supported the Rebels. But considering their were people from Alderaan serving in the Empire's military when it happened, it's hard to argue that everyone there supported the Rebels before it was blown up.

and they allowed freedom to express emotion while the light side of the force achieved none of this.
I'm not sure what this has to do with anything. The Jedi may have held a tighter reign on their emotions than the Sith, but it's not like they forced people to do that.

All in all, the people running the Empire were pretty evil if only for the fact that they had a nasty habit of building weapons that could destroy planets, and using them simply to tell people they weren't to be fucked with. Nothing says back the hell off like genocide after all.
 

Fappy

\[T]/
Jan 4, 2010
12,010
0
41
Country
United States
They are also incredibly racist and consider all non-humans second class citizens at best or slave races at worst.
 

zumbledum

New member
Nov 13, 2011
673
0
0
hooglese said:
In the movies, the Imperials/Dark Side are a democratic republic, they kept the galaxy in peace, they only blew up Alderaan because the enemy was gathering there and they allowed freedom to express emotion while the light side of the force achieved none of this.

*Note that I am excluding the latest movies because they were just garbage.

Think your getting a bit confused. the Imperials are an Empire they are ruled by a single Emperor. The republic was a democratic or actually thats wrong it was a republic which isnt a democracy , America isnt actually democratic its a republic to.

The Emperor being a powerful Sith lord is "Evil" as are all Sith , but the majority of imperial citizens do not differ from republic ones so its not really right to say either the Empire and the republic are good or evil as a whole.

Also the line between Sith and Jedi isnt really one of Good vs Evil either way. Its closer to say the Sith are selfish and wish to shape the universe according to their will. and the jedi seek to allow it unfold as it will.

The sith use their emotions to feed their strength , anger and hate are the easiest so most common but they will use love regret anything that they have to work with. Jedi seek to go the other way and avoid all emotion operate from a position of pure peace and logic,

A sith might torture and murder for fun and sport, but a jedi would let a meteor crash into his old families home without lifting a finger to help them.
 

AzrealMaximillion

New member
Jan 20, 2010
3,216
0
0
hooglese said:
In the movies, the Imperials/Dark Side are a democratic republic, they kept the galaxy in peace, they only blew up Alderaan because the enemy was gathering there and they allowed freedom to express emotion while the light side of the force achieved none of this.

*Note that I am excluding the latest movies because they were just garbage.
Are you being serious?
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
hooglese said:
In the movies, the Imperials/Dark Side are a democratic republic, they kept the galaxy in peace, they only blew up Alderaan because the enemy was gathering there and they allowed freedom to express emotion while the light side of the force achieved none of this.

*Note that I am excluding the latest movies because they were just garbage.
They were a democratic republic. By the time the Death Star was floating about not only were they democratic in the same sense the Congo is, but they drop any and all pretension by simply disolving the Senate and handing power to Imperial Regional governers (guess which film devoured my childhood).

Plus their standard search and interrogation method seems to be torture, then summary execution and disposal of bodies by fire.

What exactly did the Jawas and the Lars family do to deserve such treatment? They handled a pair of robots of no particular significance as far as they knew. In both cases the troopers could simply have driven up and asked, claiming they were stolen from their commanding officer or something similarly mundane (and then the film would have been half an hour long), but nope, murder it is.

There is also the minor point that they built a planet destroying laser specifically for the purpose of squashing political unrest. That's kind of an Isrealis in Palestine approach, kill everyone and you're sure to get the one who's your enemy.
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
This is all based on the Imperial Military, which itself was only one part of the greater machine that was the Empire. There was also the endless propaganda, secret police services, Dark Jedi assassin squads, and the Inquisition.

The average Imperial Citizen lived in ignorance of the atrocities committed by the government due to how embedded in society the spin doctors and propaganda machines were. Leveling a city block to squash an uprising would be covered up as demolition work on an "abandoned" area of the planet, being renovated for new tenants.
 

Frankster

Space Ace
Mar 13, 2009
2,507
0
0
Apollo45 said:
a peaceful one that was threatening no one (hell, according to Leia they didn't even have weapons)
Just want to adress this as i feel its BS and Leia was lying through her teeth on that one.

Putting aside the extended universe and TOR mmo which depicts Alderaan as a beautiful planet sure, but certainly no stranger to violence and weapons (also the average alderaan is oppressed by the self serving ruling classes and well off nobility to which Leia belonged to), lets not forget Alderaan was a hub of the rebel alliance and anti imperial propaganda and thinking (partially because the nobles of that world viewed themselves as untouchable due to being Aldereraanians), they actively supplied rebel forces and were a constant thorn in the Empires side but would constantly hide beyond the Senate and regulations or other excuses such as "we are just a peaceful planet!" when truth be told Alderaan was a very active and prevalent backer of the rebel alliance.

Ps: Not saying the Empire is anything less then evil or that rebels arent the designiated good guys by comparison. But feel rebels get white washed a bit too much.
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
Frankster said:
Apollo45 said:
a peaceful one that was threatening no one (hell, according to Leia they didn't even have weapons)
Just want to adress this as i feel its BS and Leia was lying through her teeth on that one.

Putting aside the extended universe and TOR mmo which depicts Alderaan as a beautiful planet sure, but certainly no stranger to violence and weapons (also the average alderaan is oppressed by the self serving ruling classes and well off nobility to which Leia belonged to), lets not forget Alderaan was a hub of the rebel alliance and anti imperial propaganda and thinking (partially because the nobles of that world viewed themselves as untouchable due to being Aldereraanians), they actively supplied rebel forces and were a constant thorn in the Empires side but would constantly hide beyond the Senate and regulations or other excuses such as "we are just a peaceful planet!" when truth be told Alderaan was a very active and prevalent backer of the rebel alliance.
The Old Republic takes place three thousand years before the films, and if you are including that, then the rest of the EU applies as well. Following the Ruusan Reformations 1000 years prior to the films, the Republic Military was disbanded in favor of the Judicial Forces, pretty much Space Police. Republic Worlds could not have standing military forces, but would provide a number of volunteers to the Judicial Forces.

Alderaan might have been a hotbed for Rebel support, but being a sympathizer to a cause does not automatically make you a supporter. Like Luke said himself.

"It's not that I don't like the Empire, I hate it! But there's nothing I can do about it right now."

So billions of innocents had to die because of the guilty few. When the inverse happened, and Kyp Durron destroyed the entire Carida System, one of the Empire's most prized military academies, it is treated as a horrific war crime. Sure, you took out a military target, but you also just annihilated an entire star system, and signed the death warrant for anyone within distance of the supernova.

I do agree with you about the squeaky clean Rebels, however. One thing that people like to forget is that the celebrations on Coruscant at the end of Return of the Jedi were in fact riots. On the Imperial Capital. How many hundreds must have been massacred in response to the civil disobedience, because some idiot Rebel agent decided to broadcast that message on public channels?

Sure it got the word out, but it did so at the cost of countless people.
 

Ed130 The Vanguard

(Insert witty quote here)
Sep 10, 2008
3,782
0
0
viranimus said:
Aris Khandr said:
Alderaan was not destroyed because the Rebels were hiding there. It was merely a demonstration to keep the other systems in line. That would be like the US blowing up all of France, just to intimidate Somalia.
No, I think a more accurate example would be the US dropping two atomic bombs killing roughly 200 thousand people in short order as a demonstration of ungodly power in order to intimidate Japan into surrendering instead of a prolonged conventional campaign that would have drug on for years and likely resulted in deaths that would number closer to the millions.
You know, you're right! It is exactly the same as the atomic bombings...

Except that Alderaan didn't have a military. (Barring a planetary shield)

Nor was it engaged in a war against the Empire.

In fact it was still considered a part of the Empire (The complaining whinny liberal part anyway).

huh...

I guess it would be more like nuking California or Texas because it was getting uppity than anything.
 

Frankster

Space Ace
Mar 13, 2009
2,507
0
0
Soviet Heavy said:
I find it hard to believe the disarmement would apply to the Alderaanian nobles, not least cos of their attitudes and their tendency to view themselves as above such petty restrictions. The problem with violence and weapons didnt come from any alderaanian police but the squabbles of the nobles who had their own personal armies. I really cant see them disarming their entire houses, not least cos of their dimissive snobby attitudes.

Alderaan was more then just a hotbed for sympathisers, it had an active role in supplying and helping with the rebel movement. Princess Leia being the best example right there, constantly protesting her innocence or how they are on a "peaceful diplomatic mission" but actually smuggling top secret plans that would change the course of the war...

And you misunderstand me, im not attempting to justify Alderaans destruction as moral or good in anyway, and not even trying to say destroying an entire planet of people is anything less then irrevocably evil.

Also imo the average person of alderaan would have no clue of all this, they are all just servants and serfs to the mighty snobby Alderaanian nobles (TOR was a real eye opener in this regard).
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Assuming this is a joke, but....

hooglese said:
In the movies, the Imperials/Dark Side are a democratic republic,
With an Emperor. That statement's about as logical as the Wise old Queen of 15 years who was democratically elected on Naboo.

they kept the galaxy in peace,
Except for the parts that weren't at peace. I mean, smugglers, drug dealers and bounty hunters abound.

they only blew up Alderaan because the enemy was gathering there
Actually, they targeted Alderan to make a demonstration of Leia's homeworld. This extortion was an attempt to get her to rat out the Alliance, and even when a name was given, they destroyed her planet anyway because the base given was too remote.

and they allowed freedom to express emotion while the light side of the force achieved none of this.
I'm not even sure what you're on about here.
 

Altorin

Jack of No Trades
May 16, 2008
6,976
0
0
ummmm... the empire isn't a democratic republic. It's an autocracy. Note that it has an Emperor, not a President, or Chancellor. The emperor rules with an iron fist, and he basically single-handedly stole the galaxy from its citizens. Through dirty tricks involving droid armies and clone troopers. Even if you ignore the prequels and Palpatine's rise to power, it still stands that he's an emperor who uses a "death star" to stomp out rebels who wish to return to an earlier time of relative freedom and peace, when they weren't stuck under the oppressive and dark regime of a tyrannical dictator.

and there's no justification for destroying a planet, especially one that's heavily populated. You must be trollin'