What's the last AAA game you played that wasn't part of a preexisting IP?

Recommended Videos

Ihateregistering1

New member
Mar 30, 2011
2,034
0
0
Does it count if it wanted to become a huge new IP, but was a giant flop?

If so, then Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning.
 

Windcaler

New member
Nov 7, 2010
1,331
0
0
Hmmm, I would have said divnity original sin but I dont think that qualifies as AAA even though the game has AAA quality in just about every aspect (if you havnt played it I highly recommend it, it was my #1 game of last year). Sooooo I think it would be watch dogs. Which was an ok game. Not revoltionary or evolutionary as the hype would have had you believe but it was just an all around good game about vigalantism in a near future world with hacking magic.

Before that...uh, well Bloodborne is a spiritual successor to Dark souls...Destiny is a spiritual successor to Halo...Dishonored is a spiritual successor to thief...Bravely default is a spiritual successor to Final fantasy...Fire emblem awaking is Fire emblem 5?...Shin Megami Tensai Devil summoner is...well Shin magami tensai...ok Im gonna stop there. Theres just to much derivitive work for me to give an honest answer. However to be fair thats what the AAA side of the industry does, they take an idea and refine it while creating a new game in a new setting
 

theSovietConnection

Survivor, VDNKh Station
Jan 14, 2009
2,418
0
0
Windcaler said:
Hmmm, I would have said divnity original sin but I dont think that qualifies as AAA even though the game has AAA quality in just about every aspect (if you havnt played it I highly recommend it, it was my #1 game of last year).
Actually the Divinity series stems from a rather high quality RTS series. If you liked the lore of Original Sin I highly recommend you give the RTS' a look (also assuming you like turn based RTS games, of course).
 

JohnnyDelRay

New member
Jul 29, 2010
1,321
0
0
Evil Within for me. I don't think it's developer credentials or "spiritual successor" nature would interfere with that, and it's definitely a AAA game. Enjoyed it enough, wasn't ground breaking or anything but a good game with some very cool enemies and locales.

Other than that, just Watch Dogs. Which I also give more credit than it received, not getting riled up in the hype I actually found it a pretty cohesive little game with good shooting / hacking mechanics which involved a unique take on environment manipulation for advantage in shootouts/chases.

I would not consider Shadow of Mordor a new IP due to there being many LOTR games/movies out there already, however I think it stands on it's own merit as a unique game with good mechanics. Yeah they took the fighting from Batman like so many others have now, but they did something awesome with it.
 

1981

New member
May 28, 2015
217
0
0
Murdered: Soul Suspect. I'd actually like to see it get a sequel since it's one of those coulda-been's.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
20,078
4,778
118
Windcaler said:
Hmmm, I would have said divnity original sin but I dont think that qualifies as AAA even though the game has AAA quality in just about every aspect (if you havnt played it I highly recommend it, it was my #1 game of last year). Sooooo I think it would be watch dogs. Which was an ok game. Not revoltionary or evolutionary as the hype would have had you believe but it was just an all around good game about vigalantism in a near future world with hacking magic.

Before that...uh, well Bloodborne is a spiritual successor to Dark souls...Destiny is a spiritual successor to Halo...Dishonored is a spiritual successor to thief...Bravely default is a spiritual successor to Final fantasy...Fire emblem awaking is Fire emblem 5?...Shin Megami Tensai Devil summoner is...well Shin magami tensai...ok Im gonna stop there. Theres just to much derivitive work for me to give an honest answer. However to be fair thats what the AAA side of the industry does, they take an idea and refine it while creating a new game in a new setting
I think 'spiritual successor' applies if the games share the same dev/publisher. Which is the case with the Souls games and Bloodborne. Not sure about the others.
 

laggyteabag

Scrolling through forums, instead of playing games
Legacy
Oct 25, 2009
3,447
1,181
118
UK
Gender
He/Him
Probably Destiny, though that game is similar to Halo in more ways than one, sooooooooooooooooooooooo
 

Remus

Reprogrammed Spambot
Nov 24, 2012
1,697
0
0
Destiny. The Taken King has tasted my bow and it was good!
 

HardkorSB

New member
Mar 18, 2010
1,477
0
0
I haven't played anything from this generation yet (still waiting for the console prices to drop to £200).
As far as the previous generation goes, the most recent original AAA games I remember playing were Alan Wake (really good), Sleeping Dogs (also really good) and The Evil Within (not as good as the previous 2 but not as bad as a lot of people are claiming it is).
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
Last few? Bloodborne, The Last of Us, and Destiny.

There have been a decent number of new ones that have already spawned sequels. Dishonored, Borderlands and several others.

I know Doublefine isn't seen as AAA, but I'd count their games as AAA due to the quality of their work being so far above indie production. Indie as a title means so little with some studies.
 

Dragonbums

Indulge in it's whiffy sensation
May 9, 2013
3,307
0
0
Splatoon for me.

All the other games I played this year have been indies so they don't count by your OP standards.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
20,078
4,778
118
HardkorSB said:
I haven't played anything from this generation yet (still waiting for the console prices to drop to £200).
Me neither, I think the newest game I have is Wolfenstein: The New Order on the PS3, which of course isn't a new IP.
I have The Last of Us and Dishonored (both fresh IPs) but haven't played them yet.
 

Fallow

NSFB
Oct 29, 2014
423
0
0
Zhukov said:
Dishonored.

I attempted a replay in February. Didn't get far before getting bored.

It's not a bad game I suppose, but it makes me want to play the game it could have been instead. Mostly it's just too fucking easy, with the player's various abilities being hilariously overpowered. Story is shit too. Setting was great though.

It's getting a sequel, naturally.
I really thought I was the only one with this particular view. So glad I'm not alone.

OT: Do MMOs count? Skyforge?

Otherwise I have no idea :(
 

vallorn

Tunnel Open, Communication Open.
Nov 18, 2009
2,308
2
43
Bloodborne. Before that, inFamous and Mirror's Edge if memory serves but I've probably forgotten something.
 

R.K. Meades

New member
Oct 1, 2014
99
0
0
Nimcha said:
Kind of cheating but I played Destiny at a friend's place, I don't own it myself. I'm thinking of getting it now though, the new expansion seems to really make it a good game.
The Taken King fixed most of Destiny's biggest flaws. If you want to play in the Crucible, the old standard loadout[footnote]Exotic hand cannon, shotgun with Rangefinder or Shot Package, and rocket launcher with Grenades & Horseshoes.[/footnote] is no longer an absolute must. It is so refreshing to see scout rifles, auto rifles, and pulse rifles showing up in the kill feed. Right now, if Bungie could find a way to offer regular competitive play - custom lobbies, sponsored tournaments, and improved public matchmaking - Destiny would make a serious play for the title of best multiplayer shooter on a console.

theSovietConnection said:
Lufia Erim said:
Word of warning. The only dlc that matters is The taken king. Anything before that is a shell of what those expansions were. Im not sure if you need all the DLC to play the taken king. But it may be cheaper to buy the legendary edition that buying them all seperately. And aparently the phsyical copy is cheaper than the digital one.

If you are going to buy DLC. Do some research first.
Alright. Only reason I was considering the House of Wolves and the other DLC (can't remember it's name offhand) was for story purposes, so if they aren't exactly that essential I may get Taken King next paycheque then.
The Dark Below was decent, but it was definitely too short. The raid is great fun. My regular fireteam's among the tiny minority who actually run Crota's End legit every week-- we only ever cheese the raid if somebody needs to head out for work, or a new player keeps wiping the team out.

For what it's worth, I ended up getting a physical Legendary Edition - and the in-game Collector's Edition bonuses - for a cheaper price than the digital release. If you do decide on a 'complete' package, you'll find that patch 2.0 made the previous content slot into the vanilla game quite well.[footnote]The first mission of the Dark Below expansion - the Fist of Crota - is given quite early in the game right now. In the vanilla game, there were missions where you would visit locations that referred to Crota and Oryx, but it made no sense. That's no longer the case.[/footnote]
 

McElroy

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 3, 2013
4,650
407
88
Finland
Is League of Legends AAA? If not, then... um... I played the first God of War in early August. I haven't played any current gen games.