s0denone said:
Flames66 said:
I don't know why you have to chastise me for answering the question in the OP honestly, but sure, I'll bite.
Ignoring the fact I didn't see much chastisement in that and that he has the right to criticize, maybe it's because he saw your answer as disrespectful? I mean, you did say people who still live with their parents are pathetic in your eyes and left little room for exceptions. As lacking in empathy? As lacking in basic understanding of individual circumstance and personal choice, the state of the economy, and other cultures? You did say you've been to Spain and know there's cultural differences but still think it's quite odd? As relying heavily on assumptions and anecdotes? If we're getting anecdotal I have a few friends that would fit your description of dependent and irresponsible, but even more who are as independent and responsible as can be WHILE living with their parents. What I mean by the latter is they work hard, they have a job, they pay all their own bills, they pay for their own groceries, they paid for their car, they pay for their school, some of them even pay rent.
When I first went off to college it was a university that was a 7 hour drive away. I, more or less, stayed up there for 2 years. I lived in an apartment and then later in the dorms when I couldn't maintain stability that way despite that doing the latter made me sacrifice some stability for more academic financial insecurity. I completely broke down in a way most people might a hard time understanding and was taken back home when I was inaccurately diagnosed with the wrong mental illness. I have more recently been diagnosed with bipolar depression, which is at times a relief to be aware of and other times something I'm not sure I have but continue to take the medication anyway out of respect for the trouble my family, psychologist, and psychiatrist went through and as a precaution against the latter feeling just being ego.
I live with my Mom (my parents are divorced) because the job I most recently have worked out for the 2 years since I came back has not allowed me to save up the necessary money to go back to the university I was formerly going to. I live with my Mom because she wants me to until I get things settled. I live with my Mom because that break down cost me deeply academically and I still need to rectify the situation to be allowed back. I live with my Mom because I have a friend in a somewhat similar situation academically and mentally (but no mental illness). He has allowed what I perceive to be his feelings of worried dependence and entrenchment to cost him financially as he tries to barely get by paying rent for his apartment on minimum wage rather than save up to go back to school. Despite that, he still respects people in my situation though.
Now, I won't pretend like I didn't let things slip by at times or was perfectly responsible or that a lot of the blame isn't on me. Heck, like I said earlier I take this too far sometimes to the point I'm not sure I have bipolar depression and, in my case, that line of thinking can get very dangerous. Still, yes much of it is my fault and I take it in stride and try to muster the will and pull myself up by my bootstraps. But, I was no more irresponsible than the average SUCCESSFUL college student likes to be from time to time without the kind of problems I had to deal with.
The fact of the matter is society is supposed to make it so the next generation has an easier time getting past the basics, that life is better, often dishonestly mischaracterized as coddling, so they waste less of their time and focus on progression. We stand on the shoulders of giants, don't we? We used to live in tribes and go out in a 100 mile radius scavenging. Now we don't. Should we lament more that people don't spend massive parts of their day anymore just getting their food because work ethic? We can spend our time more productively, working smarter, not harder. It doesn't mean we devalue a work ethic. It does make it sound like many, not all, older people are spiteful and envious when they should be creating those conditions for younger people in the first place because of how UNNECESSARILY hard they had it. They should not be destroying the limited capacity those conditions still exist because they want to recreate unnecessary hardship. There's necessary hardship and there's unnecessary hardship. We want to get rid of the latter and, from my point of view, you're obfuscating the two.
I posted this in another thread but it is relevant here too even if by some definitions I'm not a millenial:
s0denone said:
EDIT: To the person/people saying people only move out when they're young because their parents help them finance it / they inherit from there parents: You need to get a fucking grip, mate. That has absolutely nothing to do with it - and is quite contrary to real life, I'm my exprience.
Just to reiterate...it can't be that sometimes this is true? Circumstance isn't important? I could just as easily say what you say is quite contrary to real life in my experience. Although, it's more to me that your perspective is quite different to my own.