Indeed, but I think we can safely say that it's people who have a more remarkable score who are more likely to post. IQ measures brainpower in the same way that BMI measures fat though.green_dude said:It's probably a whole number of little factors, without having access to a whole shit ton of statistics though we won't actually know.
170 is well above genius level. As a rule 100 is constantly updated to represent the average. 70 and below is considered retarded.LuckyClover95 said:aren't you legally classed as retarded if you get an IQ score below a certain point? 170 or something?
That is actually not true and just pop cultureCanid117 said:170 is well above genius level. As a rule 100 is constantly updated to represent the average. 70 and below is considered retarded.LuckyClover95 said:aren't you legally classed as retarded if you get an IQ score below a certain point? 170 or something?
I meant 70, I said 70 in my head :/Canid117 said:170 is well above genius level. As a rule 100 is constantly updated to represent the average. 70 and below is considered retarded.LuckyClover95 said:aren't you legally classed as retarded if you get an IQ score below a certain point? 170 or something?
I just realised I put 170 not 70, oops :/tigermilk said:Wow we appear to be pretty much the only two people here who aren't a) geniuses with the world at our feet but can't be bothered to take advantage of the wonderful gift of an IQ so high one can earn large amounts of money utilising said gift.LuckyClover95 said:I think, 108 or something?
I don't know enough about IQ to argue for or against it, but it must be sort of important as aren't you legally classed as retarded if you get an IQ score below a certain point? 170 or something?
What a suprise there is such a strong correlation between a very high IQ and laziness, it is almost as if people are deeply insecure liars. Still I suppose that is what the internet is for (that and looking at naked women being degraded.
p.s. Kudos for the honesty about your IQ score.