When has something been too mean-spirited or cruel for you to enjoy?

Recommended Videos

IOwnTheSpire

New member
Jul 27, 2014
365
0
0
CyanCat47 said:
Because in the book tommen is 8. as for the standards of the time the king would have to do some pretty extreme stuff before a significant ammount of people began to care. taking three sisters as lovers simoultaneously, being betrothed to infants for the sake of gaining land or just straight up executing wives they didn't like. the habsburgs were the most incestious family for centuries and still held major power and prestige. also considering how few eligible baratheon heirs are left in westeros most would forgive a king for marrying and having children even if he was a minor. also tommen may be young but he is not an imbicile. the relationship seemed pretty consentual on his part and margaery never explicitly forceed him to, told him to or even asked him to have intercourse with her
Given his personality, there's no way Tommen instigated it. Margaery is clearly taking advantage of his vulnerability and naivete; Natalie Dormer herself confirmed it and said it was child abuse. Saying yes doesn't automatically make it okay; look at female teachers who abuse male students, many of those students have suffered severe psychological distress as a result of what they went through. Some have argued that Ramsay had every right to force himself onto Sansa, yet the show clearly depicts what he did as horrible. Look at something like Firefly: the main character ends up in a marriage with a beautiful woman who expects to sleep with him, but due to her apparent inexperience and naivete, everyone tells this guy that sleeping with her would be wrong. Read [URL="http://theculturalvacuum.tumblr.com/post/117806525944/trading-kittens-for-coitus" (title,target)]this[/URL], it talks about much of what I'm trying to say.
 

CyanCat47_v1legacy

New member
Nov 26, 2014
495
0
0
IOwnTheSpire said:
CyanCat47 said:
Because in the book tommen is 8. as for the standards of the time the king would have to do some pretty extreme stuff before a significant ammount of people began to care. taking three sisters as lovers simoultaneously, being betrothed to infants for the sake of gaining land or just straight up executing wives they didn't like. the habsburgs were the most incestious family for centuries and still held major power and prestige. also considering how few eligible baratheon heirs are left in westeros most would forgive a king for marrying and having children even if he was a minor. also tommen may be young but he is not an imbicile. the relationship seemed pretty consentual on his part and margaery never explicitly forceed him to, told him to or even asked him to have intercourse with her
Given his personality, there's no way Tommen instigated it. Margaery is clearly taking advantage of his vulnerability and naivete; Natalie Dormer herself confirmed it and said it was child abuse. Saying yes doesn't automatically make it okay; look at female teachers who abuse male students, many of those students have suffered severe psychological distress as a result of what they went through. Some have argued that Ramsay had every right to force himself onto Sansa, yet the show clearly depicts what he did as horrible. Look at something like Firefly: the main character ends up in a marriage with a beautiful woman who expects to sleep with him, but due to her apparent inexperience and naivete, everyone tells this guy that sleeping with her would be wrong. Read [URL="http://theculturalvacuum.tumblr.com/post/117806525944/trading-kittens-for-coitus" (title,target)]this[/URL], it talks about much of what I'm trying to say.
okay it does actually make a fair few good points. i think most people (including myself) don't notice this mainly because it is a very complicated and particular case of character inconsistency. on the one hand margaery has up to this point been shown as someone who is not above sexual manipulation but at the same time is not a creepy fetishist like ramsay or joffrey. i do see that scene in a very different light now but i think a lot of moments like these pass by the avarage viewer, especcially inn the case of book adaptations.
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,247
0
0
OK, I've got a better one now and I'm really surprised nobody has mentioned it. Who here remembers Catdog? It was a Nicktoon around the time of Hey Arnold and it died out around the time Spongebob began his meteoric rise (if I remember correctly). Catdog is currently being aired on Nick's overnight 90's block.

Anyway! What's my issue with Catdog? The premise of the show seems to be to focus everybody's hate and aggression on one pair of characters: the titular Catdog. Catdog are a pair of conjoined brothers, one cat one dog and they're attached at the waist like this:


So the first obvious question comes from how they eat and dispose of bodily waste but luckily I don't recall that ever being an episode. As you might be able to tell from the above, Cat is the smart one and Dog is the dumb one and in a way, these characters can be summarized as Proto-Squidward (Cat is a stuffy, snooty, Snoot) and Proto-Spongebob (Dog is a manic, hyper-active idiot). You may recall Squidward's line, "Why is it that whenever I'm having fun, it's wrong?" This line basically personifies Cat's character since many plots involve ways for Cat to go off and do his own thing so long as he cuts Dog out of his life. This also manifests in episodes where something catches Dog's attention and, as Dog runs off to chase a plot, Cat is literally dragged along. When the plots aren't doing this, the show has a gang of bullies (the Greaser Dogs I think) who routinely beat up Catdog (they tend to focus on Cat more often but Dog is never fully ignored by them and their beatings). When Catdog aren't being terrorized by Greaser Dogs, they're bothered by their rat room-mate Winslow who is a chronic asshole. The other recurring character who seems to be in every episode is Rancid Rabbit who functions in exactly the same way as The Red Guy from Cow and Chicken but unlike The Red Guy, Rancid Rabbit is another straight-up asshole character. Red Guy seemed to be made of self-parody in a way and while he too was an asshole it was incredibly difficult to take him as a serious threat. Rancid Rabbit on the other hand seems to live to make Catdog's lives miserable and take all of their money to boot.

The absolute worst part of the show is how often Dog seems to be the overall target of all of this abuse the show hurls at the titular characters. Sometimes it's indirect: as the dumb character it's easy to believe that Dog can't foresee issues that would arise from his own shenanigans. Other times it seems much more malicious since there are a number of episodes that rely on Cat doing something that would either alienate or else screw over Dog in a way that Dog is able to understand. These generally end in Cat listening to his conscience and cutting out the dickitry but we still have to sit through a sad-dog scene.

I feel like I've seen a lot of elements in Catdog in other cartoons; Cow and Chicken, Rocko's Modern Life, Ren & Stimpy, Spongebob...and when all of those shows have Catdog-like elements, they're generally done much better. Catdog is such an awful, mean-spirited show that it's ruined Jim Cummings for me. The legendary voice actor who's likely given your favorite childhood characters their voices (Pete from Mickey Mouse canon, Whinny the Pooh and Tigger too, Ultra Lord, Fuzzy Lumpkins, even Dr. Robotnik in 93-94) is somebody who I absolutely can't stand listening too simply because he voiced my most hated animated character from my childhood.
 

BrawlMan

Lover of beat'em ups.
Legacy
Mar 10, 2016
34,800
14,270
118
Detroit, Michigan
Country
United States of America
Gender
Male
Shoggoth2588 said:
OK, I've got a better one now and I'm really surprised nobody has mentioned it. Who here remembers Catdog? It was a Nicktoon around the time of Hey Arnold and it died out around the time Spongebob began his meteoric rise (if I remember correctly). Catdog is currently being aired on Nick's overnight 90's block.

Anyway! What's my issue with Catdog? The premise of the show seems to be to focus everybody's hate and aggression on one pair of characters: the titular Catdog. Catdog are a pair of conjoined brothers, one cat one dog and they're attached at the waist like this:


So the first obvious question comes from how they eat and dispose of bodily waste but luckily I don't recall that ever being an episode. As you might be able to tell from the above, Cat is the smart one and Dog is the dumb one and in a way, these characters can be summarized as Proto-Squidward (Cat is a stuffy, snooty, Snoot) and Proto-Spongebob (Dog is a manic, hyper-active idiot). You may recall Squidward's line, "Why is it that whenever I'm having fun, it's wrong?" This line basically personifies Cat's character since many plots involve ways for Cat to go off and do his own thing so long as he cuts Dog out of his life. This also manifests in episodes where something catches Dog's attention and, as Dog runs off to chase a plot, Cat is literally dragged along. When the plots aren't doing this, the show has a gang of bullies (the Greaser Dogs I think) who routinely beat up Catdog (they tend to focus on Cat more often but Dog is never fully ignored by them and their beatings). When Catdog aren't being terrorized by Greaser Dogs, they're bothered by their rat room-mate Winslow who is a chronic asshole. The other recurring character who seems to be in every episode is Rancid Rabbit who functions in exactly the same way as The Red Guy from Cow and Chicken but unlike The Red Guy, Rancid Rabbit is another straight-up asshole character. Red Guy seemed to be made of self-parody in a way and while he too was an asshole it was incredibly difficult to take him as a serious threat. Rancid Rabbit on the other hand seems to live to make Catdog's lives miserable and take all of their money to boot.

The absolute worst part of the show is how often Dog seems to be the overall target of all of this abuse the show hurls at the titular characters. Sometimes it's indirect: as the dumb character it's easy to believe that Dog can't foresee issues that would arise from his own shenanigans. Other times it seems much more malicious since there are a number of episodes that rely on Cat doing something that would either alienate or else screw over Dog in a way that Dog is able to understand. These generally end in Cat listening to his conscience and cutting out the dickitry but we still have to sit through a sad-dog scene.

I feel like I've seen a lot of elements in Catdog in other cartoons; Cow and Chicken, Rocko's Modern Life, Ren & Stimpy, Spongebob...and when all of those shows have Catdog-like elements, they're generally done much better. Catdog is such an awful, mean-spirited show that it's ruined Jim Cummings for me. The legendary voice actor who's likely given your favorite childhood characters their voices (Pete from Mickey Mouse canon, Whinny the Pooh and Tigger too, Ultra Lord, Fuzzy Lumpkins, even Dr. Robotnik in 93-94) is somebody who I absolutely can't stand listening too simply because he voiced my most hated animated character from my childhood.
Similar to Ed, Edd, n Eddy, once you have seen the CatDog movies, there is no point in watching any of the TV episodes again. I can still listen Jim Cummings anyway, so him playing as Cat had no negative affects on me. That man can sing a mean Ghostbusters song too.