I believe the bible only condemns sodomy, not homosexuality itself. Or at least, the passages in the bible (Leviticus 18 and 20, and Romans 1; these three are at least the most important, and the more minor passages are no different in intent) are referencing sodomy much more explicitly, and are a lot more ambiguous on the root of the 'problem' itself.Nieroshai said:It's a tradition thing. Does not in any form mean any genuine Christian who follows the Bible hates you, but that homosexuality is the equivalent of lying, stealing, etc. in the vein that our god says "do not do this." If he doesn't exist, then we're wrong. If he does, then whatever because immorality is for Him to judge, and us to accept that humans in general are flawed of their own doing. All of us.
So i can kill people if they don't pass very simple tests. So for at least a few mouths after birth i can kill babies. If some one gets brain damage I can kill them. If someone is reaaalllly drunk or tired I can kill them.Boyninja616 said:When a child develops the ability to make an informed decision.UBERfionn said:So when does it become self aware? Does it suddenly just become self aware?Boyninja616 said:One could argue that as the foetus is not self-aware, it doesn't have the capacity to make choices. Also, it is the mother who must endure childbirth and then support the child, so it should fall to her.UBERfionn said:So no baby killing then? pity.Boyninja616 said:I worded it slightly wrong. A born child is an independent form of life. It is not part of anything or anyone else. A foetus is, and the person it is dependent on should be given the choice about whether to keep it or not. It's all about personal freedoms, especially for victims of rape.UBERfionn said:A child is dependent on the mother. Does that mean we can kill babies?Boyninja616 said:4. A foetus is not an independent life-form. It cannot survive without the mother, therefore it is dependent. The person it is dependent on should decide what to do with it.
I couldn't give a flying f%@* if I insult Christianity. What are they going to do? Murder is a sin, is it not?
But anyway, rape aside, abortion seems a bit extreme. What about the babies life? What about his choice?
Nothing i can say about the childbirth but there is always adoption.
Example: putting the square peg through the square hole because you know the two shapes are the same.
LOL.FargoDog said:'Why do you only wear glasses sometimes?'
And..
'So Singapore speaks both English and Asian?'
Clobbertron said:That post reminds me of something that happened to a friend of mine. She lived in Morocco for a while, but she lives in Canada again now. Some girl went up to her and said "If you're from Africa, how come you're white?"DanielDeFig said:When i tell ppl i have lived in countries in Africa (Zambia, Kenya), i can sometimes get this question:
"So...Do you speak African?" (Sometimes they will ask if i speak Kenyan or Zambian, which is equally stupid but slightly more forgivable)
Actually, you can, well sort of.Double A said:Not directed to me, but stupid nonetheless.
"Can you grow polyester?"
Unfortunately, thats called murder. It's illegal.UBERfionn said:So i can kill people if they don't pass very simple tests. So for at least a few mouths after birth i can kill babies. If some one gets brain damage I can kill them. If someone is reaaalllly drunk or tired I can kill them.Boyninja616 said:When a child develops the ability to make an informed decision.UBERfionn said:So when does it become self aware? Does it suddenly just become self aware?Boyninja616 said:One could argue that as the foetus is not self-aware, it doesn't have the capacity to make choices. Also, it is the mother who must endure childbirth and then support the child, so it should fall to her.UBERfionn said:So no baby killing then? pity.Boyninja616 said:I worded it slightly wrong. A born child is an independent form of life. It is not part of anything or anyone else. A foetus is, and the person it is dependent on should be given the choice about whether to keep it or not. It's all about personal freedoms, especially for victims of rape.UBERfionn said:A child is dependent on the mother. Does that mean we can kill babies?Boyninja616 said:4. A foetus is not an independent life-form. It cannot survive without the mother, therefore it is dependent. The person it is dependent on should decide what to do with it.
I couldn't give a flying f%@* if I insult Christianity. What are they going to do? Murder is a sin, is it not?
But anyway, rape aside, abortion seems a bit extreme. What about the babies life? What about his choice?
Nothing i can say about the childbirth but there is always adoption.
Example: putting the square peg through the square hole because you know the two shapes are the same.
Dude, Great Britain is not next to Europe, it's a part of it.Duruznik said:-"...What does that have to do with anythinng?! Think, it's next to Europe!"
-"Greenland?"
-"NO! It's ENGLAND! Just south of Scotland!"
So it's only murder if the person has been born?Boyninja616 said:Unfortunately, thats called murder. It's illegal.UBERfionn said:So i can kill people if they don't pass very simple tests. So for at least a few mouths after birth i can kill babies. If some one gets brain damage I can kill them. If someone is reaaalllly drunk or tired I can kill them.Boyninja616 said:When a child develops the ability to make an informed decision.UBERfionn said:So when does it become self aware? Does it suddenly just become self aware?Boyninja616 said:One could argue that as the foetus is not self-aware, it doesn't have the capacity to make choices. Also, it is the mother who must endure childbirth and then support the child, so it should fall to her.UBERfionn said:So no baby killing then? pity.Boyninja616 said:I worded it slightly wrong. A born child is an independent form of life. It is not part of anything or anyone else. A foetus is, and the person it is dependent on should be given the choice about whether to keep it or not. It's all about personal freedoms, especially for victims of rape.UBERfionn said:A child is dependent on the mother. Does that mean we can kill babies?Boyninja616 said:4. A foetus is not an independent life-form. It cannot survive without the mother, therefore it is dependent. The person it is dependent on should decide what to do with it.
I couldn't give a flying f%@* if I insult Christianity. What are they going to do? Murder is a sin, is it not?
But anyway, rape aside, abortion seems a bit extreme. What about the babies life? What about his choice?
Nothing i can say about the childbirth but there is always adoption.
Example: putting the square peg through the square hole because you know the two shapes are the same.
If someone is drunk they are still self-aware. They simply have no control. Tired people are also still self-aware until they fall asleep and can make simple decisions, but need to spend longer doing so.
Are you implying that murdering drunk or newborn persons would be fine if it wasn't illegal?Boyninja616 said:Unfortunately, thats called murder. It's illegal.UBERfionn said:So i can kill people if they don't pass very simple tests. So for at least a few mouths after birth i can kill babies. If some one gets brain damage I can kill them. If someone is reaaalllly drunk or tired I can kill them.Boyninja616 said:When a child develops the ability to make an informed decision.UBERfionn said:So when does it become self aware? Does it suddenly just become self aware?Boyninja616 said:One could argue that as the foetus is not self-aware, it doesn't have the capacity to make choices. Also, it is the mother who must endure childbirth and then support the child, so it should fall to her.UBERfionn said:So no baby killing then? pity.Boyninja616 said:I worded it slightly wrong. A born child is an independent form of life. It is not part of anything or anyone else. A foetus is, and the person it is dependent on should be given the choice about whether to keep it or not. It's all about personal freedoms, especially for victims of rape.UBERfionn said:A child is dependent on the mother. Does that mean we can kill babies?Boyninja616 said:4. A foetus is not an independent life-form. It cannot survive without the mother, therefore it is dependent. The person it is dependent on should decide what to do with it.
I couldn't give a flying f%@* if I insult Christianity. What are they going to do? Murder is a sin, is it not?
But anyway, rape aside, abortion seems a bit extreme. What about the babies life? What about his choice?
Nothing i can say about the childbirth but there is always adoption.
Example: putting the square peg through the square hole because you know the two shapes are the same.
If someone is drunk they are still self-aware. They simply have no control. Tired people are also still self-aware until they fall asleep and can make simple decisions, but need to spend longer doing so.
ooh, story backfired on him big time. Nice oneBloodstain said:Dude, Great Britain is not next to Europe, it's a part of it.Duruznik said:-"...What does that have to do with anythinng?! Think, it's next to Europe!"
-"Greenland?"
-"NO! It's ENGLAND! Just south of Scotland!"
HAHA wow that's a bad one.DanielDeFig said:Clobbertron said:That post reminds me of something that happened to a friend of mine. She lived in Morocco for a while, but she lives in Canada again now. Some girl went up to her and said "If you're from Africa, how come you're white?"DanielDeFig said:When i tell ppl i have lived in countries in Africa (Zambia, Kenya), i can sometimes get this question:
"So...Do you speak African?" (Sometimes they will ask if i speak Kenyan or Zambian, which is equally stupid but slightly more forgivable)
Wow...LOLZ!XD! Iv'e heard stories like that too. The best one ive heard is a (possibly untrue) Bush Story:
Bush was visiting Nigeria (i think), and during one of his opening speeches he said: "I am glad to be here in the country of Africa, in the continent of Nigeria!"
Depends on one's moral standing I guess.ALuckyChance said:Are you implying that murdering drunk or newborn persons would be fine if it wasn't illegal?Boyninja616 said:Unfortunately, thats called murder. It's illegal.UBERfionn said:So i can kill people if they don't pass very simple tests. So for at least a few mouths after birth i can kill babies. If some one gets brain damage I can kill them. If someone is reaaalllly drunk or tired I can kill them.Boyninja616 said:When a child develops the ability to make an informed decision.UBERfionn said:So when does it become self aware? Does it suddenly just become self aware?Boyninja616 said:One could argue that as the foetus is not self-aware, it doesn't have the capacity to make choices. Also, it is the mother who must endure childbirth and then support the child, so it should fall to her.UBERfionn said:So no baby killing then? pity.Boyninja616 said:I worded it slightly wrong. A born child is an independent form of life. It is not part of anything or anyone else. A foetus is, and the person it is dependent on should be given the choice about whether to keep it or not. It's all about personal freedoms, especially for victims of rape.UBERfionn said:A child is dependent on the mother. Does that mean we can kill babies?Boyninja616 said:4. A foetus is not an independent life-form. It cannot survive without the mother, therefore it is dependent. The person it is dependent on should decide what to do with it.
I couldn't give a flying f%@* if I insult Christianity. What are they going to do? Murder is a sin, is it not?
But anyway, rape aside, abortion seems a bit extreme. What about the babies life? What about his choice?
Nothing i can say about the childbirth but there is always adoption.
Example: putting the square peg through the square hole because you know the two shapes are the same.
If someone is drunk they are still self-aware. They simply have no control. Tired people are also still self-aware until they fall asleep and can make simple decisions, but need to spend longer doing so.
If I'm wrong, then I apologize, but the 'unfortunately' sounds very incriminating.
Only Politically. Geographically speaking it's an island next to the continent. Most people 'round where I come from (Israel) see Britain as seperate from the continent. And it still doesn't excuse those stupid questions.Bloodstain said:Dude, Great Britain is not next to Europe, it's a part of it.Duruznik said:-"...What does that have to do with anythinng?! Think, it's next to Europe!"
-"Greenland?"
-"NO! It's ENGLAND! Just south of Scotland!"
You can thank 4Chan for that little rape of the English language.bak00777 said:My Brain hurts, and ive seen that before but cant remember where...ow!kickyourass said:"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?"