Which country is least likely to start World War 3?

Scout Tactical

New member
Jun 23, 2010
404
0
0
Lithuania, if I had to guess. Canada is probably more likely than most people think. I'm not saying they WILL, but there are tons of smaller countries that are more likely to stop existing than to be able to start a world war.
 

neoman10

Big Brother
Sep 23, 2008
1,199
0
0
Japan, because they literally can't attack anyone due to their post-World War II constitution
 

krseyffert

New member
Jan 6, 2010
196
0
0
SimuLord said:
My money's on Lesotho. Hard to start WW3 when nobody in the world has heard of you (and, with a >30% adult HIV prevalence, hard to find enough guys to field a soccer team, never mind an army.)
Yea, i agree, also because they're land locked and only have one neighbour. plus their land is mostly untraversable mountain

 

ultimateownage

This name was cool in 2008.
Feb 11, 2009
5,346
0
41
Japan. They don't even have an army! Although the same was said about Germany after WW1 so...
 

Yopaz

Sarcastic overlord
Jun 3, 2009
6,092
0
0
Wadders said:
Luxembourg.

It has no airforce, no navy, and an army of about 800.

Most people probably havn even heard of the place, bless it.
Compared to how many who actually live in Luxembourg they got the biggest army in the world! I thought there only were about 1000-2000 living there. Yeah, I'm exaggerating, but you do have a point.

Norway is a good candidate since well, we're ruled by pussies. We have a strong wish to solve conflicts rather than bombing someone.
Switzerland is also known to be quite neutral. I also think Germany wont be one to start a war since they've already lost 2 world wars already. Greece can't scratch together enough money to start a war for a while I'd say.
 

Moeglich

New member
Dec 15, 2010
3
0
0
I am going for Austria. We have startet like, two by now, so, we are not going to start a third one ... or are we? ;)
 

CouchCommando

New member
Apr 24, 2008
696
0
0
Moeglich said:
I am going for Austria. We have startet like, two by now, so, we are not going to start a third one ... or are we? ;)
Damn your right, people gotta keep an eye on you guys.
Well I recon Australia would have to be in at least the top ten countries to not start shit, we just couldn't be arsed.
(that been said we have still managed to become embroiled in nearly every major conflict of the last 100 years, weird eh?)

EDIT- Oh and one question that kinda always had me wondering in history what the hell was the plan in world war 1 when our troops tried to invade Turkey?!