Which country is least likely to start World War 3?

teisjm

New member
Mar 3, 2009
3,561
0
0
Whichever is the smallest politically most insignificant country with no army worth mentioning.
 

TimbukTurnip

New member
Jan 3, 2009
190
0
0
Holland. I just can't see them doing anything violent.
Or possibly Hawaii. They'd have to stop surfing to fight. Unless they attach machine guns to their surfboards . . .
 

SilverUchiha

New member
Dec 25, 2008
1,604
0
0
King Toasty said:
Title says it all. I'm going with Canada on this one, since we're quiet and have a very small army. And they're all away cleaning America's mess up. Again. :)
How exactly is Canada cleaning up any mess America has made? I haven't seen Canada really do anything. Ever...

OT: Um... I'm gonna go with Germany. They've been the bad-guy twice. And, in all fairness, the first world war was more of a misunderstanding. They were trying to back up Austria, but France and Russia misread the situation and things got hostile. I'm sure Germany wants to keep its nose clean, so I'm going with them .
 

Thyunda

New member
May 4, 2009
2,955
0
0
dark-amon said:
Thyunda said:
dark-amon said:
Kaptajn Emil Alfred Conan Swagga Benzon said:
Kris015 said:
Sweden.

Seriously though, USA.
If any country is going to start a world war, it's the yankeefags.
I disagree. World War 3 will likely be started by Iran or Israel.
Or by an American reaction to the way they run their country. For example? Iraq.
After Iraq USA ain't that likely to start another war for at least a decade. Considering Bush who started the Iraq-war was the most unpopular american president in history when he left office. Although if Iran attacks Israel they will invade, possibly even destroy Iran.
Doesn't mean they won't do it. Right now, though, I'd say World War III would be started by either China or America...well, unless you want the very root of the war, which with current politico-military events would probably involve North and South Korea. I suspect it'll be American soldiers currently stationed in South Korea who will suffer a direct hit from North Korean artillery, and the US would bring in reserves. China would take this as an attempt to control North Korea, and so would step in to try and keep North and South Korea separate, and to send the Americans home.
But, of course, America has a lot of manpower and allies, and a reputation to uphold. And so does China. So the stalemate would have to erupt at some point, and bam. Russia gets involved simply because she's there, and that's it for everyone.
 

Kazyan

New member
Oct 24, 2009
19
0
0
Andorra. Is that technically a micronation? In any case, neither France nor Spain will let it start anything without permission.
 

MrJohnson

New member
May 13, 2009
329
0
0
Lem0nade Inlay said:
MrJohnson said:
Lem0nade Inlay said:
Um, Australia?
Actually we will probably think we can take on some country like Korea then realise that we're not as strong and awesome as we think we are...

Maybe New Zealand?

OMG WAIT: SEALAND! The "country", which is really just a disused oil rig/helicopter landing pad in the middle of the ocean, doesn't have any population. Yet it still has a King and a royal family.
Sealand has a population of like thirty. It's an abandoned British sea fort.
Ah yes, I knew it was something like that. It's got quite a history, wasn't there a plot to assassinate the king at one point? And then there was some sort of full on invasion of Sealand by the French or someone?

Geez, I wish Australia was as interesting as Sealand :(
Yeah, it's pretty crazy. I'm not sure about the Invasion thing these two people were fighting over it with mercenary groups and one side kidnapped the other guys son, and that guy took a helicopter out and firebombed the rest of his mercenaries. Also the guy who did the kidnapping is a Neo Nazi.
 

InnerRebellion

New member
Mar 6, 2010
2,059
0
0
Christiana. Is that how it's spelled? Oh well.

No wait.

Ireland. They say god invented whiskey to keep us Irish from ruling the world, you know.