Which country is least likely to start World War 3?

dark-amon

New member
Aug 22, 2009
606
0
0
It would be hillarious if it was Norway, with it's tiny population, low prioritized military, and the country where the worlds most recognized peace-award is delivered.
 

IamQ

New member
Mar 29, 2009
5,226
0
0
Iceland. Even if they had the people, they wouldn't be able to finance it.
 

Thyunda

New member
May 4, 2009
2,955
0
0
dark-amon said:
Kaptajn Emil Alfred Conan Swagga Benzon said:
Kris015 said:
Sweden.

Seriously though, USA.
If any country is going to start a world war, it's the yankeefags.
I disagree. World War 3 will likely be started by Iran or Israel.
Or by an American reaction to the way they run their country. For example? Iraq.
 

dark-amon

New member
Aug 22, 2009
606
0
0
Thyunda said:
dark-amon said:
Kaptajn Emil Alfred Conan Swagga Benzon said:
Kris015 said:
Sweden.

Seriously though, USA.
If any country is going to start a world war, it's the yankeefags.
I disagree. World War 3 will likely be started by Iran or Israel.
Or by an American reaction to the way they run their country. For example? Iraq.
After Iraq USA ain't that likely to start another war for at least a decade. Considering Bush who started the Iraq-war was the most unpopular american president in history when he left office. Although if Iran attacks Israel they will invade, possibly even destroy Iran.
 

Torrasque

New member
Aug 6, 2010
3,441
0
0
DoomWyrd said:
Switzerland. You know, the one that is ALWAYS neutral. I'm going with that one.
I knew someone would post it before me, lol.
Every other country is astronomically more likely to start a war since they are not neutral.
Hell, the Vatican has started more wars than any other country (if you consider them a country that is)
 

Dana22

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,274
0
0
Kiribati, as the country with lowest GDP in the world, is the least one to be able to start WW3. I dont think they have any army either.
 

Kernow Chris

New member
Oct 28, 2010
46
0
0
Somewhere like East Timor or somewhere America doesn't care about.

Switzerland too, as i have already read, they are ALWAYS neutral...
 

silver wolf009

[[NULL]]
Jan 23, 2010
3,432
0
0
Germany. They have learned their lesson.

Switzerland, they really aren't doing anything on the international radar.
 

Kernow Chris

New member
Oct 28, 2010
46
0
0
Super Toast said:
Switzerland. I don't think there's a single firearm in that country.
Oh, just to let you know, they all are packing heat... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Switzerland

EDIT: Still they wouldn't do anything... lol
 

brunothepig

New member
May 18, 2009
2,163
0
0
Wadders said:
Luxembourg.

It has no airforce, no navy, and an army of about 800.

Most people probably havn even heard of the place, bless it.
I've only heard of it cause, thanks to the magic of percentages, it is technically the richest country (GDP)... Or was, I dunno if it still is.
Anyway, yeah, my choice too, cause why go to war if you already have everything you might want?
Actually... Does this count?
http://www.principality-hutt-river.com/
 

Freemon

New member
Nov 18, 2009
84
0
0
Portugal... Iceland.

Switzerland is waaaay to obvious. neutral newbs. They are like annoying spectators in TF2 servers. They don't play but still take up a slot, please someone ban them.
 

Arkzism

New member
Jan 24, 2008
359
0
0
the swiss... dunno why anybody is saying mexico or canada.... the swiss are neutral they cant start a war.. SO HA