He has a right to bear arms. He wasn't antagonizing, he watched from afar, called the cops, he was approached by Trayvon not the other way around.Shadowstar38 said:No. But then again, I wouldn't be carrying a gun while antagonizing teenagers.thenoblitt said:Lets have a large black man attack you and try and steal your fire arm, and lets see what happens? Also he known for violence, a drug dealer, and was suspended from school for fighting, also he initiated the fight, after running away. Lets see what you do, are you gonna just let him shoot you?RoonMian said:Actually, I think the ones responsible are the guy who came up with the whole "stand your ground"-law idea, the guy who came up with the idea of neighborhood watches and taking the monopoly on violence away from the police and general gun culture.JimB said:-snip-
Trayvon Martin didn't deserve to die for being afraid of a suspicious guy following him in the middle of the night and attacking him in what he well likely thought to be self defense.
George Zimmerman didn't deserve to go to jail for murder for being a vigilante asshead which resulted in him killing a boy in self defence.
In my language there are two different words for "justice" as in subjective justice (for example a bully beating up a small kid and then getting beat up by the small kid's big brother) and the actual justice given out by a court on the basis of law.
Sometimes the first kind is not to be had, it just doesn't exist and a court cannot give that kind of justice. A court can only give the kind of justice that fits between two book covers. Zimmerman being completely innocent is that kind of justice.
If that book is stupid though then that's on the conscience of everyone. Every single man and woman in Florida.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L04Vh4do6bY