Yeah, nah, always seemed embarrassingly weak.
"You're subhuman and should be my slave!"
"Well, um...you should be my master!"
"..."
"..."
"Um?"
"Yeah, nevermind."
Doesn't work.
Yes, the Irish (for example) were white and oppressed, but they were oppressed for being Irish, not because they were white. Cracker refers to the latter, it's not a slur aimed at the former, which would have some legitimacy.
"You're subhuman and should be my slave!"
"Well, um...you should be my master!"
"..."
"..."
"Um?"
"Yeah, nevermind."
Doesn't work.
That's a painfully bad strawman there. You can't pretend that saying that "cracker" doesn't refer to a group that has been oppressed is the same as saying only black people have been oppressed.AuronFtw said:Except the Inquisition, the Holocaust, and the intense racism against specific races of white even as recent as the founding of America? Being irish had a stigma for a very long time. Still does in some places.Lilani said:The difference between "******" and "cracker" in my mind is that "******" has actually been used to refer to people who are actually being subjugated and treated in the most vile ways. "Cracker" has no such historical background in blood and torture...
Pretending that blacks have the monopoly on being mistreated is just ignorant. Don't be one of those people.
Yes, the Irish (for example) were white and oppressed, but they were oppressed for being Irish, not because they were white. Cracker refers to the latter, it's not a slur aimed at the former, which would have some legitimacy.