Heh, I'm sure the modding community will be all over it within a matter of seconds.Tadaka said:As long as the modding community runs with it the way it did with Oblivion I will be happy.
I liked Oblivion when I played it mod free. I adored it once I discovered mods.
So I will with hold judgment.
i like it better if i can have 8 hours of fun rather than 20 hours of mostly just getting from point A to point B and lame combat.SevenForce said:what.Azaraxzealot said:hell to the NO!
...Elder Scrolls 3, but that game SUCKED! it was WAAAAAAAAY too big ...
the.
FUCK.
TOO big? that should NEVER be a complaint. Stuff like this is why we have to put up with paying £10 for DLC that lasts 4 hours!
F-fable combat? Visceral? Or even worth a damn?Azaraxzealot said:thats why i like Fable and Fallout 3/New Vegas MUCH better
i like it when i hit something to have that thing i hit to actually RESPOND and look like it has IMPACTmaturin said:F-fable combat? Visceral? Or even worth a damn?Azaraxzealot said:thats why i like Fable and Fallout 3/New Vegas MUCH better
*backs slowly away*
Bwahaha! Classic.Matt_LRR said:It's just going to be fallout with swords.
-m
Especially since the Dragonborn is likely going to be the next Tiber Septim or something, based on consistancy of nicknames...David Bray said:Morrowind was beautiful. Oblivion was bullshit.
I'm really pumped for Skyrim because it looks to make you actually matter as a person...unless you're just going to be the Dragon Born's clerk. They might pull that.
Fair enough, the gameplay on morrowind clearly isn't for everyone. For me, it's less about actual combat, and more about the purely unadultered freedom you're given. Which is why (among other reasons) i'm pissed off about tesIV (no levitate, cities as cells etc.), and really hope that number 5 isn't dumbed down so much..Azaraxzealot said:i like it better if i can have 8 hours of fun rather than 20 hours of mostly just getting from point A to point B and lame combat.SevenForce said:what.Azaraxzealot said:hell to the NO!
...Elder Scrolls 3, but that game SUCKED! it was WAAAAAAAAY too big ...
the.
FUCK.
TOO big? that should NEVER be a complaint. Stuff like this is why we have to put up with paying £10 for DLC that lasts 4 hours!
yeah, Elder Scrolls combat has never been very visceral or even felt like i WAS hitting something whenever i swung my sword at an enemy.
thats why i like Fable and Fallout 3/New Vegas MUCH better
Two Worlds was unplayable (Seriously, did you even play it?). Possibly the worst game of that entire year. And I just searched Gothic 3 and I see that it also received some horrible scores. And neither of these games have complexity and open world to the extent that Oblvion had.omicron1 said:Say what? Oblivion was one of three "open-world RPGs" released in the 2005-2006 window: Oblivion, Gothic 3, and Two Worlds. Disregarding respective quality, they are pretty darn similar. True, they each went about making an open-world fantasy RPG in a different way - but they had the same core principles behind them.ElTigreSantiago said:I'm confused. If you people didn't like Oblivion, what game were you playing that replaced it? It's the only game that even attempts to do what it does, and I for one think that it does a damn good job.
There is a reason Oblivion has a "Game of the Year" addition. And there is a reason that there was a thread here announcing the next Elder Scrolls game, and almost every post was people in absolute joy over just hearing about it. People still love the hell out of it, and it's almost 5 years old.TragicHero84 said:I played Elder Scrolls IV, despite not having played any of the previous ones. I bought it because I love RPGs and after hearing so much about it, I figured I would love it. What a piece of shit that game turned out to be. I have never been so bored with a game in my life.