Its lazy and boring and pretty much exactly copies mods that already exist and are superior. Doesn't really justify having a price tag at all.
I like how you can ignore all the information coming from actual modders and pretend you're right.TaintedSaint said:a worthless little thing to spend money on.
Heres why i hate it:Montezuma said:SNIP
You make a good point, and I appreciate your honesty.BiscuitTrouser said:Heres why i hate it:Montezuma said:SNIP
I think Hearthfire was a totally stupid direction to go with the DLC. I hate it because i dont like the content. And i believe the time could have been better spent focusing on Skyrims strengths rather than trying to cover obscure unrelated bases.
Skyrim is a land where youre the fucking Dovakin. You kill dragons. Explore an ancient dead city. And scour the land with your fury and lightning and its fucking awesome. Skyrim is a playground. An amazing beautiful playground. With amazing rides and scenery and youre a god placed in this playground to do whatever you want. Some amazing tools in skyrim. The dwarven civilization was fascinating. The origin of the falmer. To me hearthfire is like giving you the power to change the colour of the smallest swingset in that playground. Its boring compared to the possibilities that such a setting unlocks for you. Creative and brilliant stories could be told.
Instead your mighty powerful dovakin can adopt a kid and make a fish farm. It seems like Skyrim is trying to appeal to a niche of players who honestly, even if they do play skyrim, are not playing skyrim to fullfill that need to create an average virtual life. They are there to create an amazing virtual life where they can be something above the ordinary. Im not gonna touch the mod arguement. Instead ill say hearthfire for me poorly fills a role filled by the sims. It forgets the niche Skyrim fills for gamers and tries to be too much to appease too many people. It should stick to its strengths. Add this content later after they properly explore all Skyrim can be. Its like having a beautiful unfinished painting and using the extra space for naughts and crosses. Use it for more art instead!
There's a horse armor mod, and it's really cool.anthony87 said:I don't hate Hearthfire. It's just that I'd downloaded the Olympus Mons mod that gave me a castle that I had to fight a really strong mod-exclusive dragon on top of a mountain to gain access to. 'Twas badass as fuck.
I've no interest in adopting a kid because the kids in that game annoy the fuck out of me, I don't bother with cooking, I'm not interested in a pet. Basically the stuff it added didn't interest me.
At least it's not Horse Armour.
Krantos said:1. Because Bethesda DLC historically has higher production values than user created mods (I currently have 25 mods installed for Skyrim, ~20 for Oblivion, and ~50 for Morrowind, so I know).
2. Because I support the dev.
3. Because I want Bethesda to know that PC gamers still want dev made content.
4. Because I suspect modders will use it for a starting point for future house building mods.
I don't really want to get into a "Don't buy DLC, Get MODS!" argument. Few companies have the level of community support that Bethesda has. Some companies in recent years have actively been trying to discourage modding (some even put it in their EULA). As long as Bethesda continues their high level of support for the modding of their games I will continue to purchase their DLC.
Sometimes companies need to be shown that fostering consumer loyalty and good will pays off.
Well good for the PC master race then. I guess us console users should just be left in the cold then.pilouuuu said:Because it could be so much more, because most of its features have already been done by modders and better.
I totally didn't let them get away with it because I didn't buy it.TaintedSaint said:Its horse armor period, a worthless little thing to spend money on. Find a mod that does the same thing. We can't let companies get away with crap like this anymore.