You sir are made of win you hit the nial on the head and restated my oppinion exactly what do these idiots get out of spamming a community they arnt even part of.FightThePower said:People are annoyed because they should not win.
If it's a contest about which is the superior developer, then Valve win. They make full releases, which is damn hard work; Zynga make flash games. It's like comparing McDonald's to a 5-star restaurant. The former is more popular, but the latter is obviously superior.
If it's a contest about which the Escapist community prefers, then Valve should win, because people prefer them. Most of the people who voted for Zynga just did so because Zygna posted an update on their fan page on Facebook, and swarms of people voted for that reason. These people are not part of our community, so why should they be allowed to vote?
If it's just a straight up popularity contest it's pointless because whoever has the most customers wins; might as well just go to Wikipedia and look up some numbers.
That's a little melodramatic, don't you think?Vladmir Oreilly said:If shallow, derivative time-wasters are the future are the future of the industry, then I'd rather the industry not have a future at all.
QFT. There's just so much truth in that. I prefer to call it "Hell March".Furburt said:Whatever.Frankly, I think March Mayhem is just a bad joke. I can't wait until it's over and we can all go back to normality.
All great and good, but if we're going to include browser devs then I'd still prefer to vote for the guys behind Canabalt and Robot Unicorn Attack. Just saying.Zappa Daddy said:I'm going to play devil's advocate for a minute. At last year's PAX, I listened to a speech given by some of the PopCap developers - the same brilliant dudes who brought us Peggle. Their argument was that social networking and casual games are actually GOOD for hardcore gamers. Here's the analogy they used. There are plenty of hardcore film buffs in the world, but nearly everyone watches movies. Even people who watch TV a few hours a month are still likely to have a NetFlix account or visit the local Blockbuster.
I lost count of how many posters said they had not heard of Turbine last year (especially in the final vote vs Bioware), even though Turbine won the previous year (2008) and eventually won again in 2009.TheHoboHunter said:Because one Zynga poster said "What is Valve?, I haven't Heard of Their Games"
It's a matter of pride. Plain in simple. No matter how petty it may be. People will go extreme and desperate measures when it comes to pride. All this banding together isn't a good thing either. Did you know that in most serial killing teams, statistically, the members probably would have never killed a single person if they hadn't meet their partner?Zappa Daddy said:Throughout the March Madness contest, I've seen a lot of Zynga hate and comments that any self-respecting gamer can't vote for that company.
I'm going to play devil's advocate for a minute. At last year's PAX, I listened to a speech given by some of the PopCap developers - the same brilliant dudes who brought us Peggle. Their argument was that social networking and casual games are actually GOOD for hardcore gamers. Here's the analogy they used. There are plenty of hardcore film buffs in the world, but nearly everyone watches movies. Even people who watch TV a few hours a month are still likely to have a NetFlix account or visit the local Blockbuster.
That's where PopCap wants the gaming industry to be. There are millions of people who have never played a video game before, or at least not until they tried Farmsville or Peggle or Bejeweled. The bigger the industry grows, the more mainstream it becomes, the more money and more developers will be drawn into making games.
I can see why hardcore gamers are turned off by Zynga, but casual and social games are not the enemy. If anything, they help gaming to become more mainstream.
I have to argue against that. Dictionary.com gives the definition as 'a participant in a sport.' Therefore, playing a sport does make you an athlete. Going to school might not make you a scholar, but it does make you a student. Playing games like Farmville or Nintendogs doesn't make you the sort of hardcore gamer we here at The Escapist are, but it does make you a gamer. This is the only pro I can see to Zynga's existence: Their games may not be good, but at least it draws new people in to gaming, which is always a plus. From there, they can move on to Harvest Moon, Animal Crossing, Rock Band, and Pokemon, and then can be eased into hardcore with games like Zelda or Halo. I hate Zynga for entirely different reasons. They scam their loyal fan base into installing malware and other malicious crap to speed their advancement in their (admittedly crap) games. On top of that, their games are blatant ripoffs of other Facebook games that came before (Farm Town, anyone?). They don't deserve the success that they have, and I am awaiting their fall with bated breath.Baconmonster723 said:I have to disagree with this. Because I play a sport does not make me an athlete, because I go to school does not make me a scholar. Just because someone plays flash applications or nintendogs does not make them a gamer.Furburt said:I think it's mainly because people are confusing this competition for a quality competition, whereas it's actually a popularity contest. If someone came up to me and said "Zynga are better than Valve", then I'd be inclined to argue the point. However, if someone came up to me and said "Zynga are more popular than Valve", then I'd agree with them. They are provable more popular. That doesn't mean they're any better though, and people need to realise that before getting so worked up about it.Zappa Daddy said:snip
I think that Zynga players are gamers. The same way that if you play Nintendogs, you're a gamer. It's a game. I still don't think Zynga are very good.
Of course no self respecting gamer would vote for that company. They've had a history of scamming their customers and every one of their games are a rip off, such as the whole Mob Wars law suit.Zappa Daddy said:Throughout the March Madness contest, I've seen a lot of Zynga hate and comments that any self-respecting gamer can't vote for that company.
I can see where they're coming from, however this could also be a bad thing considering if people can make millions of dollars by making casual games why bother with making mainstream ones?Zappa Daddy said:I'm going to play devil's advocate for a minute. At last year's PAX, I listened to a speech given by some of the PopCap developers - the same brilliant dudes who brought us Peggle. Their argument was that social networking and casual games are actually GOOD for hardcore gamers. Here's the analogy they used. There are plenty of hardcore film buffs in the world, but nearly everyone watches movies. Even people who watch TV a few hours a month are still likely to have a NetFlix account or visit the local Blockbuster.
That's where PopCap wants the gaming industry to be. There are millions of people who have never played a video game before, or at least not until they tried Farmsville or Peggle or Bejeweled. The bigger the industry grows, the more mainstream it becomes, the more money and more developers will be drawn into making games.
I'm fine with PopCap. Zynga on the other hand can go die in a ditch.Zappa Daddy said:I can see why hardcore gamers are turned off by Zynga, but casual and social games are not the enemy. If anything, they help gaming to become more mainstream.