i played mass effect 2 for an hour i was just wandering around places and never could get into anyone and i didnt like the combat either
Everything you say here is pretty much just your skewed opinion.LWS666 said:i think they have bad locations that don't feel as epic as they're trying to be made out, an impenetrable story with many, many plot holes, bad writing where alot of the background is in the pause menu rather than weaved into the story, akward conversation options and bland, boring gameplay.
Now thats a little more accurate. People have not seen the better games, so they love the highest quality they have personally experienced. For me Dragon Age was enjoyable but it was worst then previous titles while DA2 was even worse. Theres a line some people can go depending on their past experiences.Continuity said:I stand corrected, baldurs gate is indeed a bioware game.loc978 said:Co-publisher != developer. Fail.Continuity said:Except maybe this one: Black isle.loc978 said:Also, Baldur's Gate. All arguments against that statement are automatically invalid.
Whats more I love baldurs gate... its just a shame they haven't made anything even remotely as good since kotor.
Well, there have been a lot of plotholes. Example: In the Dwarf commoner beginning storyline, a Dwarf rogue who is level 1 beats up canonically great warriors in a straight fight. It was immersion breaking.jacobythehedgehog said:I dont really agree with much you said.
This doesnt really sound anything like a Bioware game. I am not a big Bioware guy, but writting, epicness feelings, conversations, gameplay, writting and story is what bioware games are most known for. It is alright if you don't like Bioware, but I think much of what your saying is biast.LWS666 said:so, i've been trying to figure htis out for a while about why people think the mass effect trilogy and dragon age 1 were such great games. whennever i think about them i think they have bad locations that don't feel as epic as they're trying to be made out, an impenetrable story with many, many plot holes, bad writing where alot of the background is in the pause menu rather than weaved into the story, akward conversation options and bland, boring gameplay.
Its like saying Crysis 2 looks ugly. I may not like the game, but the game looks amazing, and it has very good and intense gameplay
You miss the point. If you own a console no one else is making this sort of game. I make my charecter, shape his/her choices, conversations and abilities. I gather my team with a mix of personalities, abilities and personal abilites. I make choices that affect the game world (and the game world of games made years later). In ME this is mixed with playable shooting and DA:O (havent played 2 yet) gives me tactical strategy.LWS666 said:see, i'm seeing alot of people claim interesting stories, but the mass effect games have rather flawed stories, since the entire of mass effect 2 is just being rail roaded, where you work with cerberus because you can't work with the alliance, you can't work with the alliance because you're working with cerberus. and is filled with plot holes, the first is about 10 minutes into the game where a terrorist organization manages to make a better ship than the entire allience could.
and hta characters aren't really that great, overlooking the fact that two of them (miranda and hte justicar) are shamelessly there for sex appeal, alot of them don't actually come in use in the big mission. why did you need 2 biotics experts if you only need one? why not bring more weapon experts?
In BioWare's defense, they're just following the age-old theme of the PC getting a super huge advantage of being the PC. DAO isn't the first game where that's happened, nor will it be the last. Plus it makes you feel like a badass if you can keep your willing suspension of belief in check.RelexCryo said:Well, there have been a lot of plotholes. Example: In the Dwarf commoner beginning storyline, a Dwarf rogue who is level 1 beats up canonically great warriors in a straight fight. It was immersion breaking.jacobythehedgehog said:I dont really agree with much you said.
This doesnt really sound anything like a Bioware game. I am not a big Bioware guy, but writting, epicness feelings, conversations, gameplay, writting and story is what bioware games are most known for. It is alright if you don't like Bioware, but I think much of what your saying is biast.LWS666 said:so, i've been trying to figure htis out for a while about why people think the mass effect trilogy and dragon age 1 were such great games. whennever i think about them i think they have bad locations that don't feel as epic as they're trying to be made out, an impenetrable story with many, many plot holes, bad writing where alot of the background is in the pause menu rather than weaved into the story, akward conversation options and bland, boring gameplay.
Its like saying Crysis 2 looks ugly. I may not like the game, but the game looks amazing, and it has very good and intense gameplay
He meant Miranda.SpiderJerusalem said:The reason Bioware is heralded as being so good is because they are. Their writing is terrific, they have (mostly) very well fleshed out characters (Samara being there just for sex appeal? I guess the OP just happily glided over the parts where her entire back story is told through conversation and her actions) and they're one of the few companies that are managing to build RPG/Adventure games for an extremely wide audience.