"The sort of twee person who thinks that swearing is in anyway a sign of a lack of education, or a lack of verbal interest, is just a fucking lunatic." -Stephen Fry on the Joys Of Swearing
You and me both... You and me both. I've heard all the stories from the apparent "intellects" about how swearing is just what the common folk or the brutes do... "Well to be quite honest I don't get hung up or offended by mere words but seeing as you do... Go fuck your self -Smiles-".Lexodus said:words of me: "It's fucking ridiculous. Swearing is fantastic; just a little slip of a word can cause such shock to the prissy, stuck up and backwards morons that are still so pathetic that they're offended by mere words, and it can make you feel so much fucking better when you're angry or just need to vent."
Well... that pretty much sums it up completely. Personally, I think that bad writers fill their movies with swear words when they can't think of other words or actual jokes. That's why I dislike Kevin Smith movies.Sikachu said:Pick whichever answer you prefer:
1. They don't.
2. They're 12.
Sikachu said:Pick whichever answer you prefer:
1. They don't.
2. They're 12.
As rear as correct spellingMrhenners12 said:joe102 said:Swears enphasize points, being intellectual is elequantly insulting someone horribly without need for swearing e.g's:your as sharp as wet leather or your eye's are as good as a badger with cateracts.
no cursing but effective insults.
that is called wit. Its a rear thing these days
..Although I do hate sometimes to go with the majority appeal, invoking the Fry seems to be the best answer here.Hotshots said:In the wise words of Stephen Fry: "The sort of person who thinks swearing, in any way, is a sign of a lack of education, or a lack of verbal interest, are fucking lunatics."
That confuses me.Black Sulphur said:I guess it's the same reason people think punctuation and grammar makes them intelligent.
I couldn't have put it better myself! I like the way you think!LC Wynter said:Because swear swords are the only words making up their vocabulary besides, "hello", "goodbye" and "boobs".
Grammar is a bit of a weird example of this because most people (in England, as per my experience!) are not taught English grammar; they learn to write properly through imitation of what they read & blindly correcting mistakes when they are pointed out by the teacher. So there is a major distinction to be made between functional grammar, good grammar and bad grammar. It means making assumptions about people's grammar vs intelligence is tricky!Subzerowings said:That confuses me.Black Sulphur said:I guess it's the same reason people think punctuation and grammar makes them intelligent.
Wouldn't that mean that people who don't use good grammar aren't less intelligent than those who do?
People who aren't that well educated about grammar probably don't know much about it and are thus probably less intelligent when it comes to grammar than those who are educated about it.
If bad grammar is considered "normal" amongst those who don't know much about it, then those who do know much about it would be considered intelligent when compared to them.
This theory wouldn't apply to people that are well educated about grammar, but choose not to use it, though.