So someone else who has missed the point. Try readin the quote again, I can wait. It said nothing about whether m/k or controller is better, only you can pick the one you want on PC. So wanting to play with a controller is not a reason not to consider playing on PC, becuase you can use a controller with PC. Also since most games are now ports from console they bring the same controller scheme as at least on the 360.LiquidSolstice said:And it always works. The way it's meant to. All the time.ph0b0s123 said:Have to say, 'becuase I want to use a controller' is not a good reason as you can use every controller known to man on the PC.
This is the snobbery I can't stand from PC gamers. The classic comparison between a mouse/keyboard to a controller. There simply is none because the two are never pitted against each other.
No serious automotive race in the world pits cars against motorbikes. Motorbikes race other motorbikes, cars race other cars. It is obvious that motorbike racers will always favor motorbikes and car racers will always favor cars.
It's perfectly acceptable to say "I want to use a controller" because when every single game on the platform is designed to solely be manipulated with a controller and not a mouse/keyboard/joystick/gamepad/etc, the controls will be consistently solid and uniform. That's not to say PC controls aren't solid, but the fact of the matter is that as far as control setups go, console game developers have a lot less to worry about compared to PC game devs.
The above aside, I find a controller to be more comfortable to hold, I feel that Rumble/Vibration add a lot to a game, and I like analog control in movement.
Sometimes it takes more setup time to use the controller on the PC than on console, no argument and not my original point.
I think someone sees snobbery where there is none, but sure you go on and rant, just try to stick to the point you were quoting rather than something unrelated.