Lovesfool said:
Hmmm... It doesn't seem like you really played the game much, did you Yahtzee. You just felt like you had to do a ZPR for Wii Sports Resort, but when you started playing you thought better of it after 10 minutes.
It's not the game of the century, but there is a lot more to it, if you play passed the first 30 minutes in every game and start having some real competition against you. It's a rather big game (in length) that sucks you in (and not the other way around).
You are busted my friend.
You realize that he's assigned these, right? He doesn't choose to do them. See, the Escapist picks them, gives them to him to review, and he gets paid to attract us viewers.
Also, note that nowhere does he criticize the game for lack of playtime or insufficient challenges. He just thinks the Wiimote is shite. As should all rational people.
Suikun said:
To be honest, I have to agree with Uncle Putte here... saying that a casual game sucks (especially a casual game about sports) is much akin to making fun of the mentally retarded kid in school. While your points may be valid in the sense that they lack what other games (humans) do here and there, it comes with the territory, and saying that it's terrible from a hard-core gamer's perspective is redundant!
(No offense meant to anyone and all that disclaimer crap)
Honestly, I don't like the Wii much myself. Aside from Super Mario Galaxy and Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, I've not found much more than casual games to entertain myself with. Okay, Red Steel was pretty cool, admittedly, and anybody who complains that the controls for that were not absolutely perfect needs to remember that it was one of the first games out for the system, and they were still working things out. But I dislike it because it's not a hardcore-gamer system, and it doesn't have to be. It seems like that's the sole reason so many people are pissed off about the system; the fact that it doesn't cater to the same fanboy crowd it used to.
I quoted it before, and I'll quote again, "I guess it's better to be the king of Retard-Land than to try and continue to please the [insatiable fanboy crowd]."
He's not saying that casual games suck. As he admits in the review, everyone's always down for some mindless 'idiot' fun. Scathing namecalling aside, it's true. The main things he criticizes are the Wiimote's continued shortfalls and the strangeness of a dogfighting minigame in a sports simulator. So, while your analogy makes sense, I don't think that games which don't aim to please the hardcore crowd should receive better treatment just because they're not trying (Obviously, this analogy does not apply to humans, as mentally handicapped kids didn't choose to be vegetables).
Meh. I can see people disagreeing with his opinion, but there's no reason to call him out on a perceived bias when he's a critic. This is his job. And probably his only redeeming talent.
I kid, I kid.