theblackmonk90 said:
Xombee said:
thethingthatlurks said:
Is it wrong of me to find North Korea absolutely hilarious? It's like the leader has to have histrionic personality disorder before being allowed to rule his little shithole of a country...
North Korea has hundreds of conventional artillery pieces pointed at Seoul, a city with a population in the
millions. Seoul can be pounded into gravel at any time with no warning and no way to stop them.
Just regular people. You know, school teachers, store managers, factory workers, grumpy teenagers, old people. Don't even give a shit about N. Korea, just want to go about doing regular people things.
Hilarious.
Your wrong. Airstrikes from the S. Korean airforce and US airforce would prevent the city being levelled. There have been contingencies about this in place ever since the ceasefire in the 50's.
Also your flippant remark is wrong. No one in South Korea, especially Seoul dwellers, could ever be described as 'not giving a shit' about North Korea.
I was going to let this post go (not like it's my job to TOTALLY SCHOOL armchair generals), but your use of the word flippant is so forced... it has made me physically sick. You are trying to hard to sound like an intellectual.
I have a marine buddy on base in Seoul. They say S. Koreans wonder why, in the face of abject poverty, N. Korea FLIPPANTLY continues to threaten everybody instead of just combining back into Korea. Which brings me to another point: Why do you think, in the face of such FLIPPANCY, that S. Koreans should just bend over backwards and let N. Korean aggression define who they are and how they go about their daily lives? You think they are weak or something? How FLIPPANT of you.
I call you an armchair general because you have no understanding of actual military logistics. To you, it's as easy as AIR STRIKES AND BOMB THE ARTILLERY PIECES. I'm not an armchair general because I have an understanding of what something like that would entail: How many planes would that take? What kinds of planes do I use? How much fuel will I need? How many air fields will I need to launch from? How many will be available? How fast can I launch any given plane from these fields? How many bombs would that take? What kind of bomb do I use? How many men would that take? How do I simultaneously launch hundreds of planes so as to bomb the targets in concert with the other planes? What defenses will my men be up against? Do I need to escort the bombers? If I can't bomb all the targets, will the remaining targets commence an attack? WILL I HAVE ENOUGH FUEL TO ATTACK HUNDREDS OF TARGETS SIMULTANEOUSLY WHILE DETOURING AROUND KNOWN DEFENSES TO ATTACK IN PERFECT CONCERT WITH OTHER PLANES THAT MAY OR MAY NOT MOVE AT THE SAME SPEED OR LAUNCH QUICKLY ENOUGH FROM THEIR AIR FIELD?
WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE ARTILLERY PIECES FIRING PREEMPTIVELY BECAUSE OF THE APPROACH OF HUNDREDS OF BOMBERS? WHAT ARE THE CHANCES THAT THE VERY ACT OF POSITIONING ALL THIS HARDWARE WITHIN OPERATIONAL RANGE causes exactly what I've said over and over again.
To anybody who read this far, and who thinks I may be over-reacting a
wee bit... well sometimes you feel really strong about something. I had to lay into yonder quotee's opinion because it was freaking, incredibly, absolutely ridiculous to believe you can just bomb the Artillery emplacements.