I can see it now. "I want a goblin!". "Go get him another kid shorter then him and paint him green," *sigh*
Xombee said:theblackmonk90 said:Attack me and call me names all you want. You are still wrong. Simple as that. Feel as strong as you like, again you are still wrong.
All the questions you ask are accounted for in the contingencies. Every answer is of course contingent on how the strike comes about. The S. Koreans have spent 50 years preparing for exactly that kind of event and have planned their response if he happens. I don't claim to know exact details but it stands to reason that any nation in S Korea's situation would plan for exactly that kind of attack.
I called you flippant for your off hand comment about the S Koreans 'not giving a shit'. I disagree. Quite profoundly.I will stop mocking your unwieldy use of showy words.theblackmonk90 said:Attack me and call me names all you want.
"Simple as that, OOHHH, ain't I snappy?". Saying I'm wrong without a rebuttal is meaningless.theblackmonk90 said:You are still wrong. Simple as that. Feel as strong as you like, again you are still wrong.
Where? What "contingencies"? Where are you finding this out? Are you guessing? Just assuming? That's no grounds for an argument.theblackmonk90 said:All the questions you ask are accounted for in the contingencies.
Yes, but how do you KNOW? You claim there is a so called "contingency" but you have no idea what it is, or offered any solid evidence it exists. Here, let me explain the HUGE LEAPS OF LOGIC you are taking.theblackmonk90 said:I don't claim to know exact details but it stands to reason that any nation in S Korea's situation would plan for exactly that kind of attack.
SK is threatened by NK. SK has planned a defense. The defense involves bombing runs and a fuckload of variables notwithstanding.
How do you go from SK planning a defense to... a load of vague promises that OH YEAH THEY HAVE IT ALL SORTED OUT.
How do I know? Well this helps: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11955625Xombee said:theblackmonk90 said:Attack me and call me names all you want. You are still wrong. Simple as that. Feel as strong as you like, again you are still wrong.
All the questions you ask are accounted for in the contingencies. Every answer is of course contingent on how the strike comes about. The S. Koreans have spent 50 years preparing for exactly that kind of event and have planned their response if he happens. I don't claim to know exact details but it stands to reason that any nation in S Korea's situation would plan for exactly that kind of attack.
I called you flippant for your off hand comment about the S Koreans 'not giving a shit'. I disagree. Quite profoundly.I will stop mocking your unwieldy use of showy words.theblackmonk90 said:Attack me and call me names all you want.
"Simple as that, OOHHH, ain't I snappy?". Saying I'm wrong without a rebuttal is meaningless.theblackmonk90 said:You are still wrong. Simple as that. Feel as strong as you like, again you are still wrong.
Where? What "contingencies"? Where are you finding this out? Are you guessing? Just assuming? That's no grounds for an argument.theblackmonk90 said:All the questions you ask are accounted for in the contingencies.
Yes, but how do you KNOW? You claim there is a so called "contingency" but you have no idea what it is, or offered any solid evidence it exists. Here, let me explain the HUGE LEAPS OF LOGIC you are taking.theblackmonk90 said:I don't claim to know exact details but it stands to reason that any nation in S Korea's situation would plan for exactly that kind of attack.
SK is threatened by NK. SK has planned a defense. The defense involves bombing runs and a fuckload of variables notwithstanding.
How do you go from SK planning a defense to... a load of vague promises that OH YEAH THEY HAVE IT ALL SORTED OUT.
At the peak of the cold war Houston, my home town had 100 nuclear war heads pointed at us. And not a single fuck was given. Right now it's purported that there are still 100 war heads designated just for our little port city. But then again Russia isn't as crazy as NK. But additionally I think that the US has its missile defense line set up near Seoul although I doubt it could stop a barrage of conventional bombs...Xombee said:North Korea has hundreds of conventional artillery pieces pointed at Seoul, a city with a population in the millions. Seoul can be pounded into gravel at any time with no warning and no way to stop them.thethingthatlurks said:Is it wrong of me to find North Korea absolutely hilarious? It's like the leader has to have histrionic personality disorder before being allowed to rule his little shithole of a country...
Just regular people. You know, school teachers, store managers, factory workers, grumpy teenagers, old people. Don't even give a shit about N. Korea, just want to go about doing regular people things.
Hilarious.
Straying Bullet said:Who wants to govern a financially and morally bankrupt country anyways when you can perform Raids in Azeroth?
Also, what are the exact "requirements" to govern North Korea anyways?
Well said, Xombee.Xombee said:North Korea has hundreds of conventional artillery pieces pointed at Seoul, a city with a population in the millions. Seoul can be pounded into gravel at any time with no warning and no way to stop them.
Just regular people. You know, school teachers, store managers, factory workers, grumpy teenagers, old people. Don't even give a shit about N. Korea, just want to go about doing regular people things.
Hilarious.
Nah, that was the caught-in-Japan-with-fake-passport-trying-to-visit-Disneyland-with-his-mistress-and-who-lives-and-gambles-in-Macao-because-he's-not-wanted-in-North-Korea-Kim.GrizzlerBorno said:I saw on the BBC once, that one of the "Evil step-brothers" (hehe) was infamously quoted for saying that he "didn't agree with his country's Hereditary Rule system. he wasn't against his family, but he didn't support the system", or something like that? Why do i have a feeling that it's THAT guy, because he's a gamer; and I'm prejudiced.
Except the work camps... and testing chemical weapons on prisoners... and, of course, the general "you looked at our dear leader in a weird way" type of reasons to arrest people AND their family members.Jabberwock xeno said:Woah, so just because he plays to much video games, he's not fit to run the country?
I've always thought that Kim Jong il seemed to be a fairly interesting person, and besides him being a dictator, I really don't know of any human rights violations. His family seems pretty interesting too.
South korea will win. It would be no contest...chemicalreaper said:If the two Koreas want to battle it out to see which one's better, don't drag all of us into it... just duke it out in Starcraft!
I think that is the elder one not the second son.Frankster said:Is this the same son who got caught without proper papers or something when he tried visiting disneyland?
If so, I quite like this one