Since when did GFWL work with anything though?Rastien said:Windows 8 upon release was incompatible with games for windows live... you know GFWL Micro$oft$ own bloody DRM software didn't work with windows 8!
Since when did GFWL work with anything though?Rastien said:Windows 8 upon release was incompatible with games for windows live... you know GFWL Micro$oft$ own bloody DRM software didn't work with windows 8!
Havn't had any issues with windows 7 personally i'll admit it's a crap piece of DRM takes ages to update but it works on windows 7, it just flat our errored on windows 8.xXSnowyXx said:Since when did GFWL work with anything though?Rastien said:Windows 8 upon release was incompatible with games for windows live... you know GFWL Micro$oft$ own bloody DRM software didn't work with windows 8!
Well I guess the short answer is because Microsoft decided to tell you what you're going to like, and be damned if they let you customise it natively. Surprising no-one the attitude seems to be backfiring.Whoracle said:And yes, you can circumvent ALL problems with win8 with the odd extra tool and such. But to repeat the gripes people always have with Linux in such discussions: Why should I have to? If I have to modify the system heavily just to get it working like the predecessor (sp?) was, then why upgrade?
the oposite of what you said, derpEntitled said:The opposite of... what?Laurents van Cauwenberghe said:with the rise of kickstarter, i think that the PC as a gaming platform will do the exact oposite.Entitled said:I'm wondering if the PC as a gaming platform will survive the loss of the PC as the default home computing system.
It would be interesting to see what the old desktop machine+monitor+keyboard+mouse setup would evolve into, if only a few million gamers would keep them out of tradition.
Of losing it's leading position? Of surviving? Of evolving? Of tradition?
Eh...I've had nothing but trouble with it in the past, though I haven't used it since the early days.Rastien said:Havn't had any issues with windows 7 personally i'll admit it's a crap piece of DRM takes ages to update but it works on windows 7, it just flat our errored on windows 8.
But I didn't say any definitive statement, just listed alternative options! I wondered whether the PC platform will disappear, or it will remain a niche for gamers, or evolve into something new.Laurents van Cauwenberghe said:the oposite of what you said, derpEntitled said:Of losing it's leading position? Of surviving? Of evolving? Of tradition?
I've been saying this for a longtime. i would really love to see the sales figures of components in comparison to complete builds. It would give a clearer picture of what is happening in the PC market.Kumagawa Misogi said:Just a question but how many people on the escapist actually own an OEM PC? because to be honest everyone I know either assembles their own or gets one from a one-man-shop which wouldn't be on sales figures anyway. Hell I've never bought a PC from an OEM even my grandparents always bought from those little computer shops that self assembled.
I know that it's anecdotal but I grew up always hearing about how terrible OEM customer service was and how much a rip-off they are. So really outside of business sales I wonder how much HP or Dell sales really mean inregards to PC gaming.
I suggest you go with Windows 7.The said:Yikes. Is Windows 8 really that bad? I may be getting a gaming PC this summer, so I don't know whether or not to just go for Windows 7. Suggestions?
Well good for you. I'm glad your happy with it. But here's the thing. Gamer's don't really drive OS or PC sales all that much. We are what is best considered a somewhat profitable "niche". There are two groups that actually drive PC sales numbers. "Standard retail consumers", people like your Mom and Dad. People who use a basic off the shelf PC for e-mail, facebook etc. A not very demanding group. And "Business Users" Those who use their PC's in a business production environment be it large or small.nexus said:There is nothing wrong with Windows 8.
It's optimized very well, and to me that's all that matters. The performance is way ahead of my experience with 7. Otherwise, very little has changed for the average user from 7, except for the Tablet functionality, which I don't need or use -- but the Start screen has grown on me.
I have had literally zero issues with 8 -- that I didn't have with 7 or Vista. No compatibility issues.. everything that I want to run, runs fine. You don't even have to use the "Tablet UI" at any point, if you don't want to. But don't let that get in between you and your tirade...
Also, it only cost ~$40 for a full install.. being the cheapest Windows OS I've ever seen.
Start8 by Stardock solves the problem, the charms bar and hot corners are there but you can just ignore them, it re adds the search bar and old start button and menu so you can just type Control panel into search or hit the windows button and go straight to control panel as per win 7 .lithium.jelly said:I don't like the Start screen but I can deal. What really bugs me about TIFKAM (The Interface Formerly Known As Metro) on a desktop device are the frickin' "Hot Corners" and the godawful "Charms Bar". Plus the weird disconnect between Control Panel for the desktop interface and the equivalent for TIFKAM. Why are some items available only on one or the other, but there is no single location from which I can control everything? Terrible, terrible design. And apart from all the functional issues there is the simple fact that it is just so ugly.Zipa said:Oh and for those that don't like the start screen there are add ons out there that restore the traditional task bar and start button and disable native metro boot. (I use Start8 from Stardock but there are others to)
Do you have fixes for those problems? Something that replaces the hot corners with plain old clickable icons and fucks off that stupid "Charms Bar" entirely, putting its contents back into sensible places?
And this is why we keep a number of our decomissioned XP machines around. Realy, dont throw all of those out.faefrost said:Small businesses have been particularly burned by MS's business practice decisions with Win 8. Often in a business of less than 20 employees a down or failed computer is something that must be dealt with very quickly. In the past they could easily simply dispatch someone down to the local Office Supply Store or Best Buy to grab an off the shelf PC to meat their needs. With Win 8 they cannot do this. The retailers are restricted to Win 8 only, no options. So the small business has to endure days of downtime waiting on a custom built/business class system from Dell or HP, etc. It's had a few of my small clients switching to Mac's.
I suspect though that the poor state of the economy has at least some impact as people who are struggling to make ends meet are not going to go out and buy a new PC, they are going to make do.Aetheora said:Seeing as Windows 8 is hardly a good choice for desktop computers, and people are making downloads like Start8 to work around the Windows 8 OS to keep it like 7, I think that shows a massive problem here. Windows 8 is meant for tablets, it's not very good for PCs, so I can understand the decline
Not sure why you would think that. I was using Skype on Windows 8 about a month before the Win 8 public release.Monsterfurby said:Take it from a Win8 user who is all too happy to still have a Win7 desktop PC around: It doesn't even run Skype (which is OWNED AND PUBLISHED by Microsoft now) properly. Several games do not fare much better.