Germany provides a more faithful link in my opinion(recordkeeping was horrendous back in the day, so I'll agree with you; it's just my own leanings), as it was fashioned from the ruins of the Holy Roman Empire.Grendich said:Our latin teacher always said that noone actually knows if it's pronounced 'ts' or 'k'. Brought up the russian 'Zar/Tzar' as a reason why it might have been pronounced 'ts'.Sigmund Av Volsung said:Nothing directly comes to mind, although I do make the effort to point out that proper Latin didn't have soft 'c's, and that Caesar was pronounced Kaesar(hence: the German name for 'Emperor' is Kaiser). That and that the english word 'cut' is derivative of 'caed', which would have to be pronounced with a hard 'c'.
It would also make sense that the language changed due to Rome being a bit thinly spread. It was a vast, sprawling empire to be sure, but it wasn't populated exclusively by Romans. Perchance that the individual dialects were absorbed into Latin, and that's why we have soft/hard c conflict? Again though, it's supposition and assumption. I don't usually bring it up unless it's an egregious example