BringBackBuck said:
Beliyal said:
Good post that. Just a couple of things:
You absolutely have a right to eat whatever (non-human, non-endangered species) you want for whatever reason you want. I respect that. Eating less meat is certainly good for you and I have lost some weight and feel much better having done it myself. In this day and age you have the option of eating no meat all and (despite what some ill-informed escapists think) that is also a perfectly healthy and reasonable diet option.
I also kind of understand not eating eggs and milk because you don't like the condition these animals are kept in. In my country a consumer move away from battery farmed hens has prompted positive changes and resulted in lots of free range eggs being made available. So why not eat these eggs? these hens live a happy healthy chicken life (probably much better than they would in the wild).
Here is the bit where vegans completely lose me, and why many people consider vegans to by hypocrites: By-products from dead animals. The animal was killed for food already, these leftover bits (skin, fat etc) are either thrown away or used for something productive. If you hold the bizarre position that you refuse to support this secondary market for animal products in any way then logic holds that you be consistent in that position: No leather shoes. No cosmetics. Don't use pretty much any medicine ever. Don't live in a house, drive in a car, or use a computer (see my previous post - rendered animal fat is routinely used for lubrication in modern steel mills). Doing some of these things but not others is irrational.
Yes, I agree with you on these other accounts. I am a vegetarian, but I eat milk and eggs. Milk a bit less now, as I often buy soy milk when I feel like drinking that one, and I don't eat that much eggs so I don't buy them so often either. I don't know what's the problem with drinking milk, except that fact that animal treatment is horrible. Vegans probably avoid this because there are good enough substitutes for everything so they, probably, believe it is unnecessary to consume any animal product if there is a substitute. It is very hard to buy specific vegan food here where I live so I don't know much about it. That's why I don't really think it's a good time for me to become vegan, but I think I could be one, if there really are substitutes. However, I don't think it's necessary to jump from extreme into another and I really don't like all these labels (vegetarian, lacto-ovo vegetarian, vegan, whatever). I think it would be the best to remain an omnivore, but to cut down the amount of meat consumed and to be rational about it.
About those by-products; yes, it's a slippery slope. I think we will always be using some animal products and as I said, I have no problem with it. The problem lies with the treatment of those animals and with our exaggerating. I know people that buy leather clothing and they wear each piece once or twice and then they buy a new one. I have leather boots that I bought 7 years ago and I've yet to see the scratch on them or the reason not to wear them and replace them with another boots. I am aware that I can't avoid animal products, despite my actions and decisions, but I will try to avoid them where I can. I think that's the vegan explanation; they will do whatever they
can do to lower the amount of animal suffering. And all this is just about labelling and nit-picking. Yes, they probably use some animal products and don't even know about it, but they are doing what they can to avoid using them when they know about it. Maybe we could stop attacking them? They did more than we are doing, so why attack them because they can't go all the way? I'm sure they are aware of that, but they are still trying to lower the amount of suffering to minimum levels. I too find it kinda irrational to push the limits to the extremes, but if someone is willing to do so without endangering themselves or their surroundings, I think that's positive. And most people in the developed world have enough choices and products to choose from so you can probably avoid a lot of animal products by just knowing where to look. I've seen the community of people that eat raw food only and even in my country, they have choices about buying food. I think that's way too extreme, but if they can do it? That's wonderful. It shows just how much humans are capable of ignoring the "natural order of things" and still lead normal, healthy lives.
RevRaptor said:
At Beliyal, long rant is long.
Dude calm down. Perhaps you missed the bit where I said I value all life the same. I seen plants and animals the same. Also I studied microbiology so I know the difference between animals and plants and its not that big a difference. Look I don't condone animal cruelty but saying proper farming is wrong and we should only hunt is just plain retarded.
You can't compare my stance on plants to killing microbes. plants can feel the world around them and react to it. a lot of microbiologists believe the only reason plant's are not walking around like us is because of their ridged cell walls. They are complex life forms with proven behavioural patters. Saying eating plants is ok but animals is wrong just because they are different from animals and thus us, is what I find hypocritical.
Sorry if it looked like I'm raging. I value all life too and I didn't mean the post to look like I want us to go hunting animals in the woods with spears. Far from it; I've seen healthy way of farming animals and it doesn't involve hunting in the woods. It involves proper farms with a lot of space and animals that live on fresh air from birth till death, that have a chance to give birth, to tend to their young, to live a life without stress, without torture, fear and pain. It requires a lot of space and time, and the results are good for the animals, but you can't sustain the need for so much meat with that kind of farming.
Yes, I understand what you mean now, but we still didn't solve the problem about what is painful to the plant. Because, chopping down trees, yes, I believe plants suffer when we do that, but vegetarians and vegans don't eat trees. Or grass or flowers. We eat plants that have seasonal growth; so, is harvesting wheat painful? Picking apples, lettuce, salad, soy? Also, treatment of plants? I don't think it's an issue. They don't live in cages or are unable to grow properly, and we don't inflict pain upon them before "killing" them by harvesting them. Pesticides maybe? Well, pesticides hurt everyone, not just plants so I can't really say we do it intentionally to make plants suffer. So how does it compare, besides the fact that the loss of life in any being must be painful to some extent? The life of a plant we eat is in no way similar to the life of an animal in a slaughterhouse. And if we say killing plants is also wrong, then what? We're going to eat rocks? Besides, even people that eat meat, eat plants. There are obviously no problems with it, it's just used as an argument against vegetarians/vegans. "If you think eating animals is wrong, so is eating plants". What now? Should we stop eating plants because we think that eating animals is wrong and we must value all life the same? What about omnivores? They are "excused" because they don't think eating animals is wrong? I just don't seem to understand what would this argument accomplish. I'm sorry, but I don't see anything wrong with taking an apple from a tree. And taking an apple from a tree is not in any way similar with chopping off beaks from birds in slaughterhouses in order to stop them from plucking each other because of stress and fear. I don't see myself morally superior because I'm a vegetarian, nor am I a vegetarian only because I feel sorry for animals. I do what I can to minimise the animal suffering, but saying that is hypocritical not to care about minimising plant suffering (? what suffering exactly?) is irrational, in my opinion. Because if I'm hypocritical for eating plants, then how much of a hypocrite is a person that eats both plants and animals and speaks of plant pain?
Sorry for another rant, I just can't say anything short.