That's the Gundam 00 version used by Lockon Stratos (and his younger brother/twin brother, Lockon Stratos), different universe to Amuro ;d Though I concede that Amuro's was the first.TsunamiWombat said:Of course he doesn't get tired of being nice, his Avatar is a toy invented by the first newtype. Amuro would be proud of how he deals with the failboys.
Considering how many trials you can get for it, you really don't have a reason not to other than laziness at clicking a few links.Guess I should play WoW one of these days...
Either make WoW non canonical or simply incorporate WoW canon events into the game, with your WoW heroes playing the part of footsoldiers or similar. Take the case of Illidan's death for example. In WC4, you've got Maiev and Akama as heroes moving against him, but you could also have a Draenei/Night Elf base to amass forces with to attack the Black Temple, whereas in WoW it'd just be your 25 characters+Akama and Maiev as NPC characters. It wouldn't really be that difficult to be honest.My questions about not creating a WoW sequel are A) Won't the graphics engine eventually get dated? and B) If there is a WCIV, won't the plot of that game cause significant changes to the WoW landscape? Won't you have to make a WoW2 as a result? Unless, as the first poster stated, WoW is just non-canonical.
That double negative is confusing me. I was sorely disappointed hearing it canceled (though I am led to believe indefinitely suspended being a more suitable term,) which is mostly why I do not play any of the Warcraft titles anymore. I mostly blame WoW for it for no other reason that I can.CantFaketheFunk said:They should not have made Ghost if it wasn't going to be good
This is making the assumption that WoW players will ever procreate (I kid because I love). As for the actual article, I don't think a WoW sequel will be necessary. Just keep cranking out expansions, or adding in instances and dungeons with patch updates.L.B. Jeffries said:Son, I want you to take my Lvl 146 Paladin out for a spin. Yeah, I mean it, here's the password. Don't do anything too crazy, okay? Just drop a few meteors on some Horde scum and...God, you've grown up so fast.tendo82 said:I'm waiting for WOW to become a generational right of passage; when a father gives his son his first WOW account.
Surely one could have said the same for Everquest (though this is conjecture on my part, I've not played it), and yet they still made a sequel for it? Same with Guild Wars too.reaper_2k9 said:It would be silly to make a World of Warcraft 2 its not the kind of game that needs a sequel just expansions but on the other hand I don't think they are going to pop out numerous expansion packs to keep the game going.
better graphics and vast improvements to the world itself, such as allowing flying mounts in azeroth itselftendo82 said:Why on earth would they have to make a sequel to WOW?
Explain to me how there would be a sequel to an MMORPG.Lvl 64 Klutz said:Wait, so no WoW 2 or no Warcraft 4? The former I couldn't care less about, but to completely disregard the series to improve the MMO is kind of stupid. I don't think we *need* a Warcraft 4, but WoW is not part of the Warcraft franchise, it's simply a spin-off.
Everquest 2? Guild Wars 2?Yellow Lad Unleashed said:I personally am not surprised.
Blizzard was killing off the main characters of the RTS (as they should to keep the die-hard fans interested), but even if Blizzard hadn't, I doubt there would have been a WC4 anyways.
Explain to me how there would be a sequel to an MMORPG.Lvl 64 Klutz said:Wait, so no WoW 2 or no Warcraft 4? The former I couldn't care less about, but to completely disregard the series to improve the MMO is kind of stupid. I don't think we *need* a Warcraft 4, but WoW is not part of the Warcraft franchise, it's simply a spin-off.
The storyline got deeper? When? When we had to kill rogue zombies? Or was it the bats, or wolves that really added something to the depth of events set in motion by Warcraft 3? No, wait! I got it! It was killing a couple of respawning humans that added something!Rezfon said:I agree with blizz, it's going fine as it is and from what i've seen the sotry line is to continue and dive deeper in the normal WoW. Also why make WoW2 when theres over 11 million active subscribers on WoW today. I think if they made a WoW2 or a spinoff then people would just think blizz is being overly greedy.
As opposed to the hundreds of grunts and footmen you would churn out in Warcraft 3? The respawning creeps at creep points? The fact that your heroes would res from the dead with only a minor time and gold cost?Elurindel said:The storyline got deeper? When? When we had to kill rogue zombies? Or was it the bats, or wolves that really added something to the depth of events set in motion by Warcraft 3? No, wait! I got it! It was killing a couple of respawning humans that added something!Rezfon said:I agree with blizz, it's going fine as it is and from what i've seen the sotry line is to continue and dive deeper in the normal WoW. Also why make WoW2 when theres over 11 million active subscribers on WoW today. I think if they made a WoW2 or a spinoff then people would just think blizz is being overly greedy.
Remember the cutscenes at al? Those bits that cut away from, you know, the scene, in order to progress the plot further? The in-game movies? Mission briefings? Ring a bell? *Warning, Sarcasm is reaching critical mass*Amnestic said:As opposed to the hundreds of grunts and footmen you would churn out in Warcraft 3? The respawning creeps at creep points? The fact that your heroes would res from the dead with only a minor time and gold cost?Elurindel said:The storyline got deeper? When? When we had to kill rogue zombies? Or was it the bats, or wolves that really added something to the depth of events set in motion by Warcraft 3? No, wait! I got it! It was killing a couple of respawning humans that added something!Rezfon said:I agree with blizz, it's going fine as it is and from what i've seen the sotry line is to continue and dive deeper in the normal WoW. Also why make WoW2 when theres over 11 million active subscribers on WoW today. I think if they made a WoW2 or a spinoff then people would just think blizz is being overly greedy.
I'm sorry, what was your point?
Remember the quest details? The progress of a questline? Those bits where you get to read a little bit about the goings on in the wider world? The in-game movies?Elurindel said:Remember the cutscenes at al? Those bits that cut away from, you know, the scene, in order to progress the plot further? The in-game movies? Mission briefings? Ring a bell? *Warning, Sarcasm is reaching critical mass*Amnestic said:As opposed to the hundreds of grunts and footmen you would churn out in Warcraft 3? The respawning creeps at creep points? The fact that your heroes would res from the dead with only a minor time and gold cost?Elurindel said:The storyline got deeper? When? When we had to kill rogue zombies? Or was it the bats, or wolves that really added something to the depth of events set in motion by Warcraft 3? No, wait! I got it! It was killing a couple of respawning humans that added something!Rezfon said:I agree with blizz, it's going fine as it is and from what i've seen the sotry line is to continue and dive deeper in the normal WoW. Also why make WoW2 when theres over 11 million active subscribers on WoW today. I think if they made a WoW2 or a spinoff then people would just think blizz is being overly greedy.
I'm sorry, what was your point?