I would've defended the Xbox 360, but mine red-ringed last week, so I'm feeling rather down on the prospect of having to get a new one every 2 years until 2015. Maybe a new Xbox will come out in 2012. That would be really nice.scotth266 said:Guh. That was a bit rambling. Let me just say this: I do not believe that the 360 has a 10 year life cycle. It seems to have been built for the typical six, and Microsoft would do well to release the next iteration of the 360 in a few years to wash away all the negative feelings that have gathered around the 360. It's like the Vista of the consoles: and we need a Windows 7, stat.
They`ve apparently fixed the problem though how some people have gone through so many 360`s is just amazing i had a christmas `05 360(one of the prime risk ones) and used used it for ridiculous amounts of time on end yet it didn`t siffer the lightest problem till march this year i`m assuming most of you lot put your 360`s in burning stoves or something anyway i seem to recall the ps2 had similar (well similar ish) issues i beleive with it`s launch modelsGonzoGamer said:Not just oooburn, this is why I didn't get a 360. Sure the games might come out for 10+ years but I don't see any 360s going that long without a rrod.EMFCRACKSHOT said:oooooh burnLvl 64 Klutz said:Too bad each individual system doesn't have that life cycle.
In emulation the hardware isn't directly the problem. It's software that someone reverse engineered from what they know of the ps2 code. A LOT of guess work goes into making an emulator since you can't just directly port the code to the new (more powerful) hardware. The emulator not only has to be able to read the disk and know how to execute the code on the disk, it has to create a virtual PS2 by partitioning resources on the PC to look and act like a PS2. So even if the PC has a lot more RAM and a faster CPU and better video card, it has to be "dumbed down" to the level of the PS2.Mazty said:Just for reference, my friend is only now able to emulate PS2 games with a good FPS, and he has a quadcore and 8gb of RAM.FloodOne said:Pffft, you need a top end computer just to emulate ps2 hardware.Onmi said:Right.Abedeus said:Yeah, but PS3's main point of sell is graphics. In 5 years, PCs will be strong enough to emulate PS3 without much trouble. Hell, in two years we will have much better graphics AND fluid gameplay.
And how far along is the PS3 emulator?
That's what I thought.
A PC that emulates the 360 and ps3 may be two years off, but will cost about a thousand dollars to get running. Why not buy a 360 and ps3 for $600, and have $400 left for games and controllers?
The PS2 had problems with the optical drive. My brother-in-law went through 2 of them and a friend is on his 4th PS2. Although I can say both used the hell out of their systems and used them as DVD players as well. So if you think in terms of hours of use they both got their moneys worth out of all of their PS2s, and that's why they keep buying them.timmytom1 said:They`ve apparently fixed the problem though how some people have gone through so many 360`s is just amazing i had a christmas `05 360(one of the prime risk ones) and used used it for ridiculous amounts of time on end yet it didn`t siffer the lightest problem till march this year i`m assuming most of you lot put your 360`s in burning stoves or something anyway i seem to recall the ps2 had similar (well similar ish) issues i beleive with it`s launch modelsGonzoGamer said:Not just oooburn, this is why I didn't get a 360. Sure the games might come out for 10+ years but I don't see any 360s going that long without a rrod.EMFCRACKSHOT said:oooooh burnLvl 64 Klutz said:Too bad each individual system doesn't have that life cycle.
Burn! Quote of the day.Lvl 64 Klutz said:Too bad each individual system doesn't have that life cycle.
That's the irony: sony is notorious for making flimsy electronics but they have the sturdier system. I refused to buy a ps2 as well for that very reason. I later got a ps2 slim for free, and I'm glad I did, the slims didn't have any problems and I got to play Katamari Damacy.timmytom1 said:They`ve apparently fixed the problem though how some people have gone through so many 360`s is just amazing i had a christmas `05 360(one of the prime risk ones) and used used it for ridiculous amounts of time on end yet it didn`t siffer the lightest problem till march this year i`m assuming most of you lot put your 360`s in burning stoves or something anyway i seem to recall the ps2 had similar (well similar ish) issues i beleive with it`s launch modelsGonzoGamer said:Not just oooburn, this is why I didn't get a 360. Sure the games might come out for 10+ years but I don't see any 360s going that long without a rrod.EMFCRACKSHOT said:oooooh burnLvl 64 Klutz said:Too bad each individual system doesn't have that life cycle.
Have you SEEN Crysis?Abedeus said:Yeah, but PS3's main point of sell is graphics. In 5 years, PCs will be strong enough to emulate PS3 without much trouble. Hell, in two years we will have much better graphics AND fluid gameplay.nilcypher said:Old tech hasn't stopped people releasing games for the PS2.Mazty said:Somehow I'm sceptical of this, as by 2015, the tech in it will be horrifically dated, not to mention the repair costs will keep on increasing. Personally, I see it coming to a close near the end of 2010, and Natal coming out with a new xbox.
Problem with PC gaming has always been that it requires user knowledge that most people simply don't have besides the 8800GTX is far more graphically capable then the PS3LewsTherin said:Have you SEEN Crysis?Abedeus said:Yeah, but PS3's main point of sell is graphics. In 5 years, PCs will be strong enough to emulate PS3 without much trouble. Hell, in two years we will have much better graphics AND fluid gameplay.nilcypher said:Old tech hasn't stopped people releasing games for the PS2.Mazty said:Somehow I'm sceptical of this, as by 2015, the tech in it will be horrifically dated, not to mention the repair costs will keep on increasing. Personally, I see it coming to a close near the end of 2010, and Natal coming out with a new xbox.
Disagree. I think they will probably create a system with similar hardware, if not maybe a bit better, but I doubt they are going to create a very expensive console that will go way beyond the other two.Tenmar said:Ya know I can honestly expect Nintendo to create a console that will go past the capabilities of the PS3 and 360 in terms of power and just dominate the market because these two companies don't want to upgrade in the standard cycle. They might be causing their own demise.
When have you EVER had to do this with a PC?fenrizz said:I think that is the biggest reason console gameing is becoming more popular than PC gaming.
10 years is a good life span, because then you won't have to worry about spending a small fortune on upgrades every 2 years.
When Age of Conan was released.Credge said:When have you EVER had to do this with a PC?fenrizz said:I think that is the biggest reason console gameing is becoming more popular than PC gaming.
10 years is a good life span, because then you won't have to worry about spending a small fortune on upgrades every 2 years.
Perfectly summed up.demoman_chaos said:360 won't last that long, Gears 2 had the system huffing and puffing (a friend's 360 actually melted the inner edge of the disc) with every once of power. Then Killzone 2 appeared which looked and ran better with more people and more varied character models while still not taking the PS3 to its limits.
PS3 may be able to last 10 years, 360 maybe 1 or 2 more, Wii maybe forever if they can keep the attention of little kids and survive on the nostalgia factor.