I agree obviously. I'm not a legal buff, but everyone knows this guy won't win. It's just that he tried to find a loop-hole, which he kinda did in a way, but not one that will get him anywhere. It's like he's the kid that tries to be smart by tricking you with semantics and formalities but just ends up looking like a dip shit in the end.Kopikatsu said:He sent in alterations he wanted to be made, and said that since they neither accepted not denied it, then they accepted it by default.xXAsherahXx said:He said that if they don't respond, Microsoft owes him 500 billion. Not much to argue about with that. I don't approve of his actions but it isn't like you can find a fault with his logic there if you think about it from his prospective.artanis_neravar said:How is it airtight?xXAsherahXx said:His case is actually sorta air tight. I think the guy is a total douchebag and should really stop making an ass of himself, but it isn't like you can say he is in error.
Go for 1 million, not everything the company owns.
It doesn't work that way. If you don't accept a ToS, does it magically become accepted ten days later? 'Course not.
This guy has absolutely ZERO power in this situation. He doesn't provide the service in question, he's using it. By using it, he already agreed to the company's ToS. 'Entitled twat' doesn't even scratch the surface of this describing this kind of behavior.
Obviously he's someone who lets his disability define who they are. I've a people with aspergers(it was unmistakeable) and they were all good people, with their own quirks.The Lost Big Boss said:There was a kid in my percussion group that had asperger's, he loved to use it as a get out of jail free card. He was always acting like a little shit, giving everyone attitude, then would ***** and moan when we didn't treat him like a prince.
Based on my experience with a kid, I'm going to say he's just an asshole who thinks he is untouchable because of a handicap.
You clearly underestimate the US's legal system. This guy isn't going to get anything, in fact he is going to end up paying microsoftBlablahb said:No way, it's a lawsuit in the US. Surely they'll give him at least a few million.Weslebear said:There is a difference between bending the rules and just being a straight up hustler any court this goes to will dismiss this instantly unless the judge is stricken down with a missing fucking chromosome that day.
I had a similar experience. Seriously if people keep doing this kind of shit then aspergers will become the next insanity plea. I mean there was a member of LULZSEC who tried to do itThe Lost Big Boss said:There was a kid in my percussion group that had asperger's, he loved to use it as a get out of jail free card. He was always acting like a little shit, giving everyone attitude, then would ***** and moan when we didn't treat him like a prince.Celtic_Kerr said:Or he's incredibly anti-social and tends to focus a great deal of interest into something. Sadly, that seems to be legal disputes here, but he's interpreting how to manipulate the court wrong.Fronzel said:Hey, sounds like a pretty good performance art sati-
Never mind. He is completely serious and a huge asshole.Asperger's Syndrome
Based on my experience with a kid, I'm going to say he's just an asshole who thinks he is untouchable because of a handicap.
0.001% of 500,000,000,000 is 500,000,000. or in other words, 500 million, rather than billion.MetallicaRulez0 said:If this guy sees even 0.001% of that money, I will eat my own face.
It's kind of like the women who uses their time of the month as an excuse to be a complete and utter uber *****. When in reality (at least with all the women I know) they still have control and sometimes slip up, but immediately apologize because they still recognize that they were overly mean.Legendsmith said:Obviously he's someone who lets his disability define who they are. I've a people with aspergers(it was unmistakeable) and they were all good people, with their own quirks.The Lost Big Boss said:There was a kid in my percussion group that had asperger's, he loved to use it as a get out of jail free card. He was always acting like a little shit, giving everyone attitude, then would ***** and moan when we didn't treat him like a prince.
Based on my experience with a kid, I'm going to say he's just an asshole who thinks he is untouchable because of a handicap.
However, one thing they hated were people who, like the kid you described, let their disability define them.
The answer you give those people is that there are people who have the same disability and don't act like little shits, so they don't have the excuse.
Actually, for us to win he has to lose.mrdude2010 said:i'd love to see him win. it would be a victory for consumers who have to deal with this stupid bullshit.
Accept they never agreed to anything at all, so nothing would really changeImp Emissary said:Actually, for us to win he has to lose.mrdude2010 said:i'd love to see him win. it would be a victory for consumers who have to deal with this stupid bullshit.
See if he wins and gets even a small amount of the money he's asked for then that means companies can keep legally doing that to us. Though, we could now do it to them possibly, but unbelievably unlikely.
However, if he loses that could mean whenever we get messed with by companies doing this with the terms of service, we could argue that we never read it and just agreed without looking, which is what Microsoft will probably argue here, meaning that if we get messed with we can say that we never read it all, and Microsoft (and other companies) can't say "Well that doesn't matter." because they will have said that and won!
If this goes that way, that is. Something else could happen. We'll see.
NO! No no no no no no!ischmalud said:hey say what u want but at least he got the balls to take on a rubbish company like microsoft at their own game - all the best may the law be with you - honestly id cheer if they ended up settling lets say for 1million or something like that
fight the power u crazy uber-nerd!!
artanis_neravar said:Imp Emissary said:"Accept they never agreed to anything at all, so nothing would really change."
True, at first, but this could start up a foundation for a law to be made that does limit when a company can or can't force you to accept the terms of service if you didn't read it.
Yes, here all Microsoft had to do with the altered terms of service to have them become "legal" was never even look at them, but is that so much more than when we get a new terms of service for an update and click accept without really reading it?
However, this is all dependent on what the final legal statement is. It may not even make it that far. Hell, maybe he'll even be forced (or talked) into making a deal out of court.
Redacted mathematics correction as other posters covered it - this is why you handle these things by private message ~_oTheDutchin said:0.001% of 500,000,000,000 is 500,000,000. or in other words, 500 million, rather than billion.MetallicaRulez0 said:If this guy sees even 0.001% of that money, I will eat my own face.