Whatever site hired the Irate Gamer. (I used to kinda like him, now he can go screw InvalidNickname's cock)
you are allowed to delete one website
- Thread starter Wintermoot
- Start date
Recommended Videos
That's just the thing, though. All memes are overused. That's how they become memes to begin with. It's because one guy said something interesting or clever or, for whatever inexplicable reason, catchy, and then a zillion other people decided to repeat it as often as possible.henritje said:
If a friend says, "I want to tell you a joke", and then he starts telling you the joke, if you've never heard it before, you'll probably listen all the way through and then laugh at the end. But then if another friend comes up to you and tries to tell you the same joke, you'll probably cut them off and tell them you've heard the joke already.
Memes are like 20 people coming up to you simultaneously and trying to shout at you a joke you've already heard.
Any social networking sites. Not because I feel they are destroying the internet (I wouldn't know if they are). But because I can't stand them.
I'd keep 4chan but purify TVTropes.
I'd keep 4chan but purify TVTropes.
Jesus, some of the people in this thread.
"Hurr hurr, Google/Wikipedia because people use it to do their homework for them/to appear smart hurr hurr."
What about the amount of computer/gaming related problems that can be solved in a simple Google search? Or if you wanna simply know more about something because you just do, what easier way than Wikipedia.
It would sorely tempt me to delete this site just to be able to watch the reactions (assuming I had a way) of all the elitist snobs, now they have no where to be snobby about shit.
But in reality, I'd either delete Encyclopedia Dramatica or www.godhatesfags.com. I don't need to explain myself here.
"Hurr hurr, Google/Wikipedia because people use it to do their homework for them/to appear smart hurr hurr."
What about the amount of computer/gaming related problems that can be solved in a simple Google search? Or if you wanna simply know more about something because you just do, what easier way than Wikipedia.
It would sorely tempt me to delete this site just to be able to watch the reactions (assuming I had a way) of all the elitist snobs, now they have no where to be snobby about shit.
But in reality, I'd either delete Encyclopedia Dramatica or www.godhatesfags.com. I don't need to explain myself here.
FOX NEWS
Maybe the idiots who believe their drivel would be forced to read actual news about actual events, rather than self created hysteria
Maybe the idiots who believe their drivel would be forced to read actual news about actual events, rather than self created hysteria
Fox,s demographic is probably to stupid to operate a computer so it wouldn't fix anything.Tipsy Giant said:
But if the people actually bothered to move over to Google+ and/or Diaspora, the community would be more active. It's not that they fail as a platform, it's that facebook is very unhelpful with transferring between sites (in fact, most social networks are).bahumat42 said:
Well the whole google/social media singularity is sort of bad for the internet, as it makes it easier to spy on users, their privacy policies are typically intrusive, and it diverts traffic away from cool but less known sites.bahumat42 said:Fragmenting what site people go on is a real painthe only social media that can survive outside of fb are ones for datng ^^.
Don't the Westboro Baptist Church have a website? Because that can fuck right off just on principle
Twitter. Never used it, but it inspires irrtioal hatred in me. Urgh. Just don't like it for some reason.
Number 1: Source?Forlong said:
Secondly, the highest rated Network in the world, would appeal to the lowest denominator, and thus would be classified as "dumb".
Fox News is horribly inaccurate, and just because something is wrong, does not make something unpopular. So that argument fails.
And guess what? This is the internet, I can slag off the entire viewership of a particular network and call them whatever I want, free speech is given to Fox News as equally as it's given to me, to be abused as I see fit.
And how can you defend them and say that those who watch Fox, are not idiotic drones, when you so readily call others that?
How can you talk about getting the facts right; when you and Fox News don't?
You know, I never did like Myspace. I could do Twitter, but there's a profile or two on there that I check up on every now and again. So it has its uses. Facebook? Tempting, but no.
I'd probably have to offline that Westboro Baptist Church place. Or Timecube, for the service of all. Or maybe... Wait, what's the biggest Scientology website? If only I could rig some sort of targeting triumvirate to somehow strike all three in one go.
I'd probably have to offline that Westboro Baptist Church place. Or Timecube, for the service of all. Or maybe... Wait, what's the biggest Scientology website? If only I could rig some sort of targeting triumvirate to somehow strike all three in one go.