Your views on Underage Sex?

Recommended Videos

Cap'n Ninja

Magnificent Malefactor
Jan 16, 2011
1,083
0
0
Alexnader said:
If both parties consent completely than I have no issue with it provided the age difference is within the bounds set up by that equation that I can't recall at the moment.
Divide by two, add seven.

OT: I'm not a fan of the idea, but it happens and that's fair enough, some people over the legal age shouldn't be allowed to, and there are those younger than it I know that I wouldn't be bothered about them having sex. It's mostly about maturity really.
 

WickedSkin

New member
Feb 15, 2008
615
0
0
If they can and want to have sex, go for it. Keep the age ratios appropriate though. 14 and a 35 yr old seems weird. a 25 and a 35 is ok. a 18 and a 25 is ok. a 13 and a 14 is ok. It's a little bit wrong to set such limits I know but the pedo warnings get to everyone.
 

FreakSheet

New member
Jul 16, 2011
389
0
0
Shows a real lack of self control if you seriously can't even wait for a few years. It is kinda sad to see people talk about something as beautiful as sex as some sort of activity like rock climbing, to be done when ever you want, just so long as you have protection
 

someonehairy-ish

Dead account please delete!!! @mods
Mar 15, 2009
1,949
0
41
I'll say what I always say to these threads:

The age limit imposed by the law is just an arbitrary number. There is absolutely no reason to believe that on a persons sixteenth birthday they magically gain some new insight into that world that makes them act sensibly. A fifteen year old can be reasonable and mature just as easily as a twenty-something year old can be an idiot.
If someone younger than sixteen wants to, and they understand the risks of STDs and pregnancy, then fine.

How sensible you are about it and how good your relationship with your partner is is more important than your age.
 

rayen020

New member
May 20, 2009
1,138
0
0
meh. If both parties consent, know what they are consenting to, and use protection i see no problems. The Caveat to this being do they really know what they are doing? This is something that i think our generation is going to have to deal with especially because the conservative sexual repressive chains are starting to come loose. I not gonna say we need nudity and sex on primetime television but i think it is something that we need to let kids know more about instead of throwing their hormone driven selves into high school with little to no knowledge and hoping they can figure it out on their own.
 

MASTACHIEFPWN

Will fight you and lose
Mar 27, 2010
2,279
0
0
The thing a lot of people fail to see is we are programmed to do it.

I find that if you are careful, and don't become like a slut, you are fine.
Do it every once in a while, I can understand.

Do it constantly, that's where I draw the line.
 

Legendairy314

New member
Aug 26, 2010
610
0
0
In the immortal words of South Park, "17, you're ready." I believe that's a decent age that has the most compromise between sex early and actually understanding the consequences. Any younger than that and I just see the number of mistakes rising considerably. So even 16 is a stretch for me.
 

orangeban

New member
Nov 27, 2009
1,442
0
0
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
The thing a lot of people fail to see is we are programmed to do it.

I find that if you are careful, and don't become like a slut, you are fine.
Do it every once in a while, I can understand.

Do it constantly, that's where I draw the line.
Why? As you say, we are programmed to do it, our bodies activally encourage us to do it (with arousal, orgasms and such) so why not? I play videogames because they're a ton of fun, I have sex because it is also a ton of fun! (Alright, I'll spill, I'm not actually old enough to have sex, but I masturbate a lot so close enough (not really but it'll do))
 

dickywebster

New member
Jul 11, 2011
497
0
0
Depends on the person and the country, as for example Swedens age of consent is 15, while americas is 18 (dont quote me on those numbers), so whats underage in america isnt always in sweden
But really, as long as its not forced on them, with someone of the same age and they know what theyre doing, i dont see whats wrong, but below teenager years and its just wrong for me :S
And i think its upto people what they do, its their bodies and so forth
Oh and big age differences unless the youngest is at least 16 or 17 is not only wrong put probably counts under pedophilia

Kinda complicated when you think about it without saying no outright
 

orangeban

New member
Nov 27, 2009
1,442
0
0
The thing with the age limits is they are just arbitrary numbers. Britain has 16, America 18, Spain 13. These numbers don't really mean anything, but you have to make a line somewhere. In Britain we have 16 because at 16 you can leave school, in America I assume it's because 18 is when you become an "adult". I guess Spain chose 13 as the beginning of puberty.

If you didn't have the line then anyone could have sex. And none of us want 8 year olds getting it on.

So we've got to have a line somewhere, and really, and we might as well respect that line or why bother having one at all?
 

Michael Hirst

New member
May 18, 2011
552
0
0
Well there's only so far stomping around say "YOU KIDS SHOULDNT HAVE SEX" will work, it does result in a lot of kids feeling like they can't talk about it to their parents, as awkward as that is anyway they're basically told they best lie about it or they will be in trouble.

Contraception should be readily available to kids, I don't think them having sex is a good thing but at least let them have access to safe sex. Of course this won't prevent EVERY underage pregnancy but it prevents a lot more than having no contraception whatsoever. I remember being a young teenager and wanting sex pretty fucking badly. I didn't really talk about it with my parents but they were smart enough to arm me with condoms.

But naturally I'm against people over the age of consent having sex with people below and I know this must be a faded line when you've just hit that age but deal with it and find someone else to stick it in!
 

Deadlock Radium

New member
Mar 29, 2009
2,272
0
0
Gennadios said:
If there's grass on the field, play ball.

OT: I think that if they're both matured, use contraceptives, are in a good relationship and they both agree to do it, they should be 15.

I just find it unsettling (Dunno if that word can be used in this context.) when I hear about people under that age having sex. Here in Norway, the legal age is 16, though, and I'm fine with it being that "high", as younger than that is kinda disturbing.
 

BlumiereBleck

New member
Dec 11, 2008
5,401
0
0
Underage sex is kinda really not thinking, the only safe way to have sex is by not doing it. And if you're that horny you need to feel like you need to be having sex at..what are the kids these days doing it at?*reads newspaper* GOOD GOLLY 13 seriously! I mean comeon! Wait till you're 18 or something!
 

dickywebster

New member
Jul 11, 2011
497
0
0
Skullkid4187 said:
dickywebster said:
Depends on the person and the country, as for example Swedens age of consent is 15, while americas is 18
It varies from 16-18 depending on the state.
Thanks for saying as ive only heard a general 18 and something about state variation, but i wasnt sure enough to say. Mind you, doesnt that make things complicated in america?
 

BlumiereBleck

New member
Dec 11, 2008
5,401
0
0
dickywebster said:
Skullkid4187 said:
dickywebster said:
Depends on the person and the country, as for example Swedens age of consent is 15, while americas is 18
It varies from 16-18 depending on the state.
Thanks for saying as ive only heard a general 18 and something about state variation, but i wasnt sure enough to say. Mind you, doesnt that make things complicated in america?
Somewhat I live in Ohio and the age of consent law is 17. Indiana(Our neighboring State)has 16 as its age of consent. Say you(17) and your 16 year old girlfriend wanted to have sex. You both live in Ohio. SO the two of you drive to Indiana, and have sex and get caught, because you both legally live in Ohio you committed a crime and will be punished with pedophilia a minor form of it but still.
 

dickywebster

New member
Jul 11, 2011
497
0
0
Skullkid4187 said:
dickywebster said:
Skullkid4187 said:
dickywebster said:
Depends on the person and the country, as for example Swedens age of consent is 15, while americas is 18
It varies from 16-18 depending on the state.
Thanks for saying as ive only heard a general 18 and something about state variation, but i wasnt sure enough to say. Mind you, doesnt that make things complicated in america?
Somewhat I live in Ohio and the age of consent law is 17. Indiana(Our neighboring State)has 16 as its age of consent. Say you(17) and your 16 year old girlfriend wanted to have sex. You both live in Ohio. SO the two of you drive to Indiana, and have sex and get caught, because you both legally live in Ohio you committed a crime and will be punished with pedophilia a minor form of it but still.
Ah ok then, so not as easy to get around as i thought, if its based upon where you live it might be harder to get around in theory, but how easy is it to enforce in reality? Ignoring actually catching them but say tracking them to where they live if they had skipped to a state with a lower age of consent?
 

xvbones

New member
Oct 29, 2009
528
0
0
orangeban said:
xvbones said:
Count Igor said:
or mature 15 year olds (I say 15 as it's close to 16)
There is no such thing as a 'mature' 15 year old.

15 year old claiming to be mature are precisely as immature as 15 year olds with no illusions about their inexperience and immaturity.

Unless that 15 year old was brought up in a war zone or has otherwise spent the majority of their life taking care of themselves and/or others, in which case that 15 year old would likely not be on this forum, discussing such frivolous things as 'when fucking is appropriate', they would be in the process of taking care of themselves and/or others.

I mean no offense to any teenagers in this thread or on this forum who think that being well-read, reasonable or intelligent is the same as 'mature.'

It isn't.

You're not.

It's to do with your life and experience:

At 15, you've spent about 3 years, tops, with any responsibility whatsoever, if that, you've had almost no life experience and have barely had time to make any catastrophic mistakes to learn from (the process called 'growing up.')

As for whether or not you're ready to have sex, that's nobody's business but yours, hers and your parents. Talk it over with them.

And wear a fucking condom.
I don't think you can wave of all 15 year olds as not being mature (even if we don't count those who grew up in war zones or who looked after themselves totally alone).

We all learn from experiences in different ways, some take petty mistakes and learn huge amounts, some lose limbs and learn nothing. 3 years of life experience could be more than enough for some, 30 years can be lacking for others. There is no magical point where you've had enough experience to be mature.

Besides, maturity is just about knowing how to react sensibly to things, common sense and (effectively) tact. It isn't some worldly wisdom that can only be picked up by living for decades.
Actually, I can wave all the 15 year olds off as not being mature because they aren't. Maturity isn't wisdom, wisdom is wisdom (15 year olds do not have wisdom either, as they have not been alive long enough to accumulate it), what maturity is, see, is maturity.

The word 'mature' literally means 'aged'. 'Fully grown'. 'Your personal peak of physical an mental development.' Taken literally or metaphorically, at 15 you have miles and miles to go. You have barely started. You are not even expected to be mature for another six years, nor are you likely to be especially mature even then.

You also need to understand, I'm not saying that the inherent immaturity of a young teenager (who in America is really not actually legally responsible for his own actions, cannot vote, cannot drink, cannot fight for his country, cannot legally hold most jobs) is a bad thing, nor that young teens are bad for their inherent immaturity. It goes with the territory, it is part of being human.

At 15, see, what you are is hormonal.

Let me put this in terms easily understood by this forum:

At 15, you are a noob.

You went through puberty at most 4 years ago, more likely three.
Your junk has only been in a functional state for less years you have fingers on your favorite hand.
Three years ago, you were in the age range Jar-Jar Binks was aimed at.
Ten years ago you were barely capable of forming complete sentences.
There are people who have been striving for decades to achieve true emotional maturity, do you honestly think you have it all figured out after three years?

With respect, you are a noob.

A lowbie, attempting to pretend you are no different than an endgame raider, but you're not.
Not because you lack the logic, the reasoning or intellectual capacity, because you have seen almost nothing of the content.
Your gear is shit and your build is rudimentary and incomplete, it will be years before you even know enough about yourself to fully form your own personality.

You are still leveling.

(btw, wear the fucking condom.

Also, everyone else in the world has felt the exact same drippy, butterflies-in-the-stomach omgsheismyentireworld that you are, you're not hardly the only one and everybody else does actually know precisely what you're going through, because they either have already gone through it or they in the process of going through it.

When it ends, for fuck's sake don't write poetry about it.

And if you write the fucking poetry, for fuck's sake keep that shit hidden, do not ever let anyone else read it, it's not deep, it's not beautiful, it doesn't reveal your tormented soul, all it does is make people avoid you because unless your name is Byron, your weepy, sorrowful poetry will invariably be wretched, godawful shit that will never stop embarrassing you.)
 

Housebroken Lunatic

New member
Sep 12, 2009
2,537
0
0
sumanoskae said:
I don't see how this is any of my business. Sex is sex, people insist on demonizing it, but that's all it is. It's not mine nor anyone else's right to tell people what to do with their free time. Things like STD's and teen pregnancy would be less common if people would just support the choices their children make and stop trying to engineer their lives.

People need to stop assuming that just because sex was a big deal for them that it will mean exactly the same thing for everyone else
Actually, considering the fact that some of the tax I pay goes to sponsoring stupid teenage mothers in the form of government welfare (which every parent or couple get in my country to insure that their kid doesn't starve to death or have to walk around without clothes) I'd say it IS my business to some extent if stupid, underage teenagers practice unsafe sex and the stupid, naive 14 year old girls refuse to have an abortion because they can "surely make it" as a parent, despite the fact that they aren't even through school yet and will most likely doom both themselves and their spawn to a life of being social parasites.

If I got to actually CHOOSE what MY taxmoney paid for, then I couldn't care less how much underaged kids fucked around with eachother or how many doomed babies shot out of their nether regions, because I sure wouldn't be the one paying for it (i'd invest my mandatory share of the taxes in more worthy pursuits like science or the weapons industry). But now that my government pretty much force me to pay for such unnecessary "delights", I think it's reasonable to say that it IS my business and that I AM entitled to an opinion about who fucks with who, how and why.
 

xvbones

New member
Oct 29, 2009
528
0
0
Housebroken Lunatic said:
sumanoskae said:
I don't see how this is any of my business. Sex is sex, people insist on demonizing it, but that's all it is. It's not mine nor anyone else's right to tell people what to do with their free time. Things like STD's and teen pregnancy would be less common if people would just support the choices their children make and stop trying to engineer their lives.

People need to stop assuming that just because sex was a big deal for them that it will mean exactly the same thing for everyone else
Actually, considering the fact that some of the tax I pay goes to sponsoring stupid teenage mothers in the form of government welfare (which every parent or couple get in my country to insure that their kid doesn't starve to death or have to walk around without clothes) I'd say it IS my business to some extent if stupid, underage teenagers practice unsafe sex and the stupid, naive 14 year old girls refuse to have an abortion because they can "surely make it" as a parent, despite the fact that they aren't even through school yet and will most likely doom both themselves and their spawn to a life of being social parasites.

If I got to actually CHOOSE what MY taxmoney paid for, then I couldn't care less how much underaged kids fucked around with eachother or how many doomed babies shot out of their nether regions, because I sure wouldn't be the one paying for it (i'd invest my mandatory share of the taxes in more worthy pursuits like science or the weapons industry). But now that my government pretty much force me to pay for such unnecessary "delights", I think it's reasonable to say that it IS my business and that I AM entitled to an opinion about who fucks with who, how and why.
You pay about fifteen cents per year towards unwed mothers.

I'm fairly certain you can spare it.

And if you don't want to spare it, tell your congressman you'd prefer your fifteen cents per year go towards sex education and contraception.



Edit: You mention 'stupid teenage mothers' who 'don't want to get an abortion' because they're certain they can hack it.

So. What about the dads?