Vince becomes a lord of the netherworld, Nergal (Catherine's dad) is your father-in-law, Catherine is your queen (in her true form she has horns, and glowing red eyes and zebra striped skin and generally looks like something painted on the side of a metal band's tour bus) and a harem of succubus concubines.Cavouku said:And besides, what's the future with Catherine, anyways? Keep in mind, I've only played the demo and watched the Susan Arendt review, and this one.
So does that mean you LIKED this game! Get him, everyone!KingKamor said:I didn't expect Yahtzee to like it even in the slightest, but seriously, people.
Don't.
Let.
Internet.
Personalities.
Shape.
Your.
Own.
Opinions.
Sweet Lord, does it piss me off when someone takes everything that Yahtzee says so literally that they simply don't buy any game that HE deems to be sub-par. Think for yourselves you goddamn sheep!
Wait...
bolded isn't easy.Strife2GFAQs said:Good, now we don't have to hear "REVIEW IT!" every week. I get the sense Yahtzee watches enough anime to get the idea, but still hate the tropes. Vincent was ineffectual. I bet you this could have been solved in five seconds with a flat "I had feelings for someone else." The game skirted this issue in a supremely ****** up way, extending the drama. I'll give Atlus this though: they know their audience. Stupid, insecure teenage or middle aged men who like seeing implied nudity...and butt monsters.
Interesting. I just don't feel like being punished for failing is really that bad of a thing. Also, I don't really know that end game mechanics have anything to do with save points.Asuka Soryu said:I severely have to disagree here.ThisNewGuy said:I agree completely about the story. Vincent is a complete tool. But I love the puzzle. I don't get the lack of autosave critique though. Do you really expect puzzle games to have autosaves in the middle of a puzzle? Can you imagine being able to autosave something like Tetris? I just don't think it's all that necessary.
While Tetris and Catherine are both from the puzzle genre, it does not mean they should be treated exactly the same.
Catherine is a row of puzzles consecutively leading through a story. They serve to give gameplay as you pass them to continue the story.
Tetris on the other hand, has no story, no end. You're not trying to go anywhere, you're trying to rack a high score. Where ever you lose is your save spot, that becomes your place you have to surpass.
In Catherine, losing means you need to restart doing the level, wich can be annoying and frustrating and can make it take longer to accomplish your goal of seeing how the game ends.
Wich is even more annoying when you're a game reviewer and you need to finish the game on a schedule.
Well once you take away the Yahtzee-ness of the video, he basically said: The game represents the basic conflict between men and women in a mind warping, misogynistic fashion, the usual in fringe japanese games. Gameplay can be frustrating and yet it's very compelling, driving you to keep going for one more level. The story segments are a bit blah, you're being railroaded in two opposite directions and the only real input you have is in how much of the story you want to experience or not before the next level.Hyakunin Isshu said:I didn't see the video, so can someone tell me if he:
1. he takes a cheap shot at anime/japan.
2. he takes a cheap shot at JRPGs
3. he takes a cheap shot at nerds and fanboys
4. he takes a cheap shot at FFXIII
5. he makes a off-topic reference that has nothing to do with the review
6. he makes a small reference about a unusual bit of food (naan bread, French Fancy)
7. He says something in the game looks like a dick
I really would like to know what he said about the game, but I can't stand those cheap shots he always makes.