Something being overwritten means that the style is so complicated and overlong that you start to lose sight of the story. You are assaulted with so much verbiage that the story becomes hard to follow. You are investing your mental energy in figuring out WHAT people are trying to say, which takes away from what is going on in the story. It can also mean giving absurd levels of detail to EVERYTHING, making it hard to keep track of which facts actually matter.Ryan Hughes said:I've honestly never understood what Yahtzee means when he calls something "overwritten." I tend to like stories, so that is kinda like a chocolate cake being over-chocolatey, or a basket of puppies being over-puppiety.
The pulley systems of modern bows kind of blow the whole user strength=kinetic energy conveyed equation away. While the strength of the user can certainly play a part at the upper limits of a bow's capability, modern bows are able to convey much more kinetic energy (more important than draw weight, because of physics) due to a longer contact time with the string, even with less force applied by the user. And the bow the Crysis guy is using is clearly a compound bow, so...Bad Jim said:Something to note about arrows is that the stronger you are, the further you can fire. Medieval longbows had a draw weight of something like 150 pounds and skeletons of medieval longbowmen have visibly deformed spines. Of course, if you have super strength, you can have a bow with a 1000 pound draw weight and kill people sitting inside armoured vehicles, from a mile away.slash2x said:Only point... Arrows do more damage. They are larger and often make a hole so big it is easy to bleed out quickly. The real issue is distance, and rate of fire... Something a cloak solves.
Yeah, I also plan to start with the first one. Now I just need to get a PC that can actually run it.Absolutionis said:Do yourself a favor and start with the first one. 2 and 3 are forgettable with pretty much the same graphics as the original game. Crysis 1 was actually really good with somewhat of an open world, vehicles, etc (even though Crysis 3 has vehicles again... barely). People always talk about the graphics, but they're meaningless unless you do something with it. Crysis 1 actually pulled it off wonderfully with you exploring a jungle with industrial area. When you almost start to get bored, out come the aliens that start to freeze everything with their pewpew ice rays. It looked good because it was good art design coupled with great graphics. Crysis 2 and 3 are short linear romps through the same areas all the time with the same graphics as the original game.FallenMessiah88 said:I've never played a Crysis game before, but the series has always intrigued me. This game looks a lot more appealing to me than the last one though.