Spookimitsu said:
Lol wat? CoH copy? What game out there is truely original, in your opinion? I guarantee you someone can come along and say "oh that x game borrowed elements from y game.". It's a Superhero MMo, OF COURSE it's going to be reminiscent of CoH. There arent that many other Superhero MMo games OUT there.
But even thats incorrect, it more closely resembles Marvel Ultimate Alliance/ X-men legends co-op RPGs. So yeah.
First of all, we Super Elitists don't wear badges, nor do we write in Capslock, we're much too awesome for both. Also, we don't back up our own rage-speaks with something like "So yeah".
Second,you know what? You're right, there are very, very, VERY few games out there which can be dubbed original, and even less who are accepted as such by everyone. You know what else? It's not really an excuse.
"It's an Superhero MMOG, so CoH and DCUO are bound to be similar" was the argument, right? With all due respect, that's bullcrap. Just because two games share the same genre and setting, it doesn't mean they have to be identical. For instance, a Superhero-game where the definition of a Superhero isn't "Wears funny, colourful costum, keeps a secret identity and has some randomly selected abilities" but something where the possible power have certain restrictions or all stem from specific sources and since every person basically could be a superhero the "secret identity"-stuff is replaced by "secretive behaviour".
Or an MMOG where you don't have levels and skilltrees but instead you get either more powerful by improving your basic abilities through practical use or try to form/find new abilities by actual effort rather than by default? And the story of the Game isn't prescribed by the developers but they create several options and then start events in certain intervalls and thus let the players shape the future of the game?
See? Superhero MMO that ISN'T CoH, and I'm not even trying.
Admittedly DCUO's options in variation are limited since it's a license game, but if I were to give DC that benefit, I'd immediately have to snatch it away for doing now what they should have done YEARS ago...kinda the time when CoH came out?
Overall it's just the point Yathzee mentioned with his "Factions"-example: The "But the other ones do that tooooo"-excuse should have ceased being an argument around the time we grew 12.
Oh yeah, I guess we can say you don't like intro movies to be completely entertaining while providing you with your necessary exposition free of charge. The intro movie was awesome. But I guess you are going for your junior woodchuck "SUPER ELITEST" badge, where cool things only pass you by like Neo in a snowball fight
Yes, because the "Gritty looking persons kill each other off in a gunmetal-grey ruin and in such a bland fashion I couldn't even care if I wanted"-scenario is just so-much-fun and so never-seen-before, there's JUST NO WAY I could be bored to my sleep with it.
And don't even get me started and that "exposition". Yahtzee stopped at that time-travel-stuff, I could rag on for hours about how that stuff makes no sense in the slightest.
But I honestly find it amusing, when people come with this "You just try to sound elitist, by dismissing our AWESOMENESS as boring"-argument, because, yes, I heard that one before.
And just as those other times it's funny to see how you "just defend" that "awesome" Designed-by-comittee-crap, while I, obviously am just so "snobbish" I "can't enjoy anything". It can't be that I actually have a specific kind of expectation to a cinematic, can it? That maybe, just maybe, after countless treadmill-trailers, where hundreds of effects attempt to obscure that nothing of interest is actually going on, I demand from nowaday' trailers to at least TRY to peak my interest in the game? For instance by...I don't know...showing me some sad, grey tross for 5 minutes and then say "Oh, yeah, all of that just now? Didn't happen, we just couldn't think of a cheaper excuse to bring the player into the setting."
Nah, that's just impossible.
PS, the game didnt introduce Brainiac, he's been around since the 60's, and yes he is chock full of complete-bad-assery. Don't write the game off because you weren't well informed.
Return to your seat and retake your English-lesson. Read after me: "[...] and then introduce [...]AS THE ULTIMATE VILLAIN." Behold: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2007/10/24/ Just in case: The punchline is in panel 2.
And thanks to the Interhighway I actually was aware who Braniac is and what he does about three minutes after I saw the trailer the first time. And here's the surprise: All of that couldn't even remotely make up that his name is BRAINIAC, a name that induces about as much fear and respect as WILLY WONKA or RONALD McDONALD.
And that was also the essence of my criticism in that sentence: If you spent 6 minutes of CGI for turning a number of the most prominent heroes and villains of the DC Universe into superpowered, gritty cousins of the punisher, regardless of their history and personality so far, then the least you should do is find an ultimate villain with a better name than Brainiac.
I honestly can't even imagine how a DC-fan would be willing to defend that turd.
But I can say, that for someone who stopped caring for comics the moment he realised that due to the lack of backbone with the writers of the comic-industry as a whole Uncle Ben will be the only character EVER to actually STAY dead, that ending was just fricking hillarious.