Zero Punctuation: Fallout: New Vegas

Recommended Videos

samaugsch

New member
Oct 13, 2010
595
0
0
Dammit, I hate it when long posts don't go through. I don't feel like typing it back up again or trying to remember everything I had said, but basically, I was saying opinions on whether or not soda dehydrates seems too evenly split to decide for certain which is which, so I'm just going to believe that it doesn't.

EDIT: Nvm, my post was delayed for some reason.
 

TwistednMean

New member
Nov 23, 2010
56
0
0
Well, for the first time in my life I'm left wondering whether Yatzee like the game or not. Frankly, for me it's also sort of a grey area. At least it's definitely better than the original and, suddenly, you can actually RP in a RPG for a change.

About the whole soda thing, strangely enough, game devs are right. Osmolarity of soda is aroung 0.5 OsM, while osmolarity of plasma and bodily fluids is around 0.3 OsM. Which means that soda does make you dehydrated. Certainly, the effect is not as profound and obvious as in the case with sea water which is 3 OsM.
 

JWAN

New member
Dec 27, 2008
2,725
0
0
I liked your new variation. Also, yea soda dehydrates you. Read the ingredients label.
 

JWAN

New member
Dec 27, 2008
2,725
0
0
samaugsch said:
Dammit, I hate it when long posts don't go through. I don't feel like typing it back up again or trying to remember everything I had said, but basically, I was saying opinions on whether or not soda dehydrates seems too evenly split to decide for certain which is which, so I'm just going to believe that it doesn't.
In my 10 years of backpacking experience I can tell you that yes, soda dehydrates you. Look at the ingredients label, sure it has water in it but the other shit in there makes your system work harder and push through more water, in the end its not beneficial.
 

JdaS

New member
Oct 16, 2009
712
0
0
It was very much a review from where I'm sitting. It's pretty much an expansion of Fallout3 with some new features, same ol' bugs and glitches and not much else, just like he said.
 

KillerRabbit

New member
Jan 3, 2009
50
0
0
Jonabob87 said:
KillerRabbit said:
Scarecrow 8 said:
KillerRabbit said:
Evilsanta said:
Ahhh...The Fallout Crashes...I dont miss them.

Anyways is this game any good? Besides the crashes that happens now and then is the game any good?
I am on my second play through of the game now, and I have only crashed once when I was alt-tabbing from fallout 3 to windows like 20 times in 1 minute due to checking score of a hockey game.

I can't speak for consolse, and I realy don't see a point in why anyone would play this kind of game on a console (?) since PC verision is superb compared to them. But on my Win 7 64bit system everything run fine.

And I completed the game before the patch came out! (And I am still unsure if steam has applied the patch to the game or not?!)

Anyway: This game is well worth buying! 9/10.
I don't quite understand what you mean by 'seeing the point' of not playing the game on the pc. Does the pc make the game better? Does it raise the immersion? I woundn't think so.
For example, in no special order:
* User made mods
* Graphics 100 times better
* Better control with mouse and keyboard
* Thanks to pc, we have games like these - with immersion, while console games is only dumbing down anything. Some console games you only have to press "X" from time to time to complete a game. So no I will not support dumbing down games (meaning buying consoles/games for them).
I see we have a member of the 'Glorious PC master race' here. User made mods are generally shit (I used to be a PC gamer, I know). They lack a polish and shine that professional add-ons have.

The PC doesn't have graphics that are a hundred times better. Why? Because the game is limited graphically so's not to make the console versions look bad.

I hate mouse and keyboard. It's too easy.

Name this game where you press X every now and then to win. Seriously, don't be such an elitist, open your mind! Just because you prefer something doesn't mean it's better and people who prefer something else are retarded.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RULv6HbgEjY
 

DayDark

New member
Oct 31, 2007
655
0
0
KillerRabbit said:
Jonabob87 said:
KillerRabbit said:
Scarecrow 8 said:
KillerRabbit said:
Evilsanta said:
Ahhh...The Fallout Crashes...I dont miss them.

Anyways is this game any good? Besides the crashes that happens now and then is the game any good?
I am on my second play through of the game now, and I have only crashed once when I was alt-tabbing from fallout 3 to windows like 20 times in 1 minute due to checking score of a hockey game.

I can't speak for consolse, and I realy don't see a point in why anyone would play this kind of game on a console (?) since PC verision is superb compared to them. But on my Win 7 64bit system everything run fine.

And I completed the game before the patch came out! (And I am still unsure if steam has applied the patch to the game or not?!)

Anyway: This game is well worth buying! 9/10.
I don't quite understand what you mean by 'seeing the point' of not playing the game on the pc. Does the pc make the game better? Does it raise the immersion? I woundn't think so.
For example, in no special order:
* User made mods
* Graphics 100 times better
* Better control with mouse and keyboard
* Thanks to pc, we have games like these - with immersion, while console games is only dumbing down anything. Some console games you only have to press "X" from time to time to complete a game. So no I will not support dumbing down games (meaning buying consoles/games for them).
I see we have a member of the 'Glorious PC master race' here. User made mods are generally shit (I used to be a PC gamer, I know). They lack a polish and shine that professional add-ons have.

The PC doesn't have graphics that are a hundred times better. Why? Because the game is limited graphically so's not to make the console versions look bad.

I hate mouse and keyboard. It's too easy.

Name this game where you press X every now and then to win. Seriously, don't be such an elitist, open your mind! Just because you prefer something doesn't mean it's better and people who prefer something else are retarded.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RULv6HbgEjY
I noticed how he didn't start from the beginning of the game, you said completed a game, not a mission.
 

Jonabob87

New member
Jan 18, 2010
543
0
0
KillerRabbit said:
Jonabob87 said:
KillerRabbit said:
Scarecrow 8 said:
KillerRabbit said:
Evilsanta said:
Ahhh...The Fallout Crashes...I dont miss them.

Anyways is this game any good? Besides the crashes that happens now and then is the game any good?
I am on my second play through of the game now, and I have only crashed once when I was alt-tabbing from fallout 3 to windows like 20 times in 1 minute due to checking score of a hockey game.

I can't speak for consolse, and I realy don't see a point in why anyone would play this kind of game on a console (?) since PC verision is superb compared to them. But on my Win 7 64bit system everything run fine.

And I completed the game before the patch came out! (And I am still unsure if steam has applied the patch to the game or not?!)

Anyway: This game is well worth buying! 9/10.
I don't quite understand what you mean by 'seeing the point' of not playing the game on the pc. Does the pc make the game better? Does it raise the immersion? I woundn't think so.
For example, in no special order:
* User made mods
* Graphics 100 times better
* Better control with mouse and keyboard
* Thanks to pc, we have games like these - with immersion, while console games is only dumbing down anything. Some console games you only have to press "X" from time to time to complete a game. So no I will not support dumbing down games (meaning buying consoles/games for them).
I see we have a member of the 'Glorious PC master race' here. User made mods are generally shit (I used to be a PC gamer, I know). They lack a polish and shine that professional add-ons have.

The PC doesn't have graphics that are a hundred times better. Why? Because the game is limited graphically so's not to make the console versions look bad.

I hate mouse and keyboard. It's too easy.

Name this game where you press X every now and then to win. Seriously, don't be such an elitist, open your mind! Just because you prefer something doesn't mean it's better and people who prefer something else are retarded.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RULv6HbgEjY
That's being played on a PC bro, thanks for destroying your own point.
 

KillerRabbit

New member
Jan 3, 2009
50
0
0
It does not matter what computer/console it is played on, my point is that the whole gaming industry is dumbing down any game ever made right now, with some exceptions. (Tip of the day: fire hurts) etc...
 

MajoraPersona

New member
Aug 4, 2009
529
0
0
For some reason, I was incredibly incensed a month ago, when this review came out. I came back and watched it again to see why, and... I'm sure I brought up my issues with it in some post back then. This particular one struck a cord, because it's one of the few console games I've played, and therefore one of the few where I knew when he skipped text.
 

Gaming King

New member
Apr 9, 2010
152
0
0
That wasn't even a review. I guess he really, REALLY meant it literally when he said same opinion as for Fallout 3.
 

Cyrus Hanley

New member
Oct 13, 2010
403
0
0
*Shamelessly bumps topic*

I recently acquired Fallout: New Vegas and I must say that it's a lot of fun, especially on Hardcore mode (which I dove straight into, despite having never played any of the previous Fallout games). :p

It's funny, because it was this video that motivated me to get it and I only just realised the other day, while wandering around in third-person mode in the Mojave Wasteland, that the character I spent hours creating with the RobCo Reflectron actually bears a physical resemblance to Yahtzee, complete with spectacles and a jaunty fedora hat. ^.^

It doesn't help either that for the first hour of exploring Goodsprings, I stole everything that wasn't nailed down (Abraxo cleaner, pilot lights, alcohol, you name it) and was overencumbered with useless junk by the end of hunting tutorial with Sunny Smiles. >_>;
 

Deacon Cole

New member
Jan 10, 2009
1,365
0
0
Country
USA
ChupathingyX said:
Also a while ago Yahtzee complained about Red Dead Redemption and I clearly remember him writing in an Extra Punctuation article that RDR would've been a lot better if you had to eat and drink while in the desert. New Vegas does exactly that and now he's complaining about it?
Ah. Fourteen pages and you're the only one who made note of this. Good show, sir.

Indeed, Mr. Croshaw did suggest this very thing [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/columns/extra-punctuation/7699-Extra-Punctuation-Red-Dead-Redemption] in his Extra Punctuation column.

Ben Croshaw said:
What it needed was a survival mechanic. On-screen meters for hunger, thirst and exhaustion, which constantly tick down as you adventure, requiring that you frequently eat, hydrate and camp out or hire a room for the night. Neglecting these stats worsens your aim, striking power and sprinting ability and decreases the size of your health bar, and may eventually cause you to pass out, at which point it's even odds whether a good samaritan finds you first or a mountain lion. Lose the insta-horse recall button and make it easier for a horse you're not riding to wander off, die or get nicked by opportunistic Mexicans.

Instantly, with the struggle of human existence reinstated, virtually every other mechanic is enriched. Money has more worth because of the appeal of softer beds, larger canteens and tastier food. Players would have to be sure they were properly equipped before heading out of town. For a game with a plot whose central theme seems to be "pretentious trappings of civilization versus harsh purity of the wilderness," it would be most fitting if the player had to ask themselves how much it would take for them to abandon civilization. How desperate will you need to be before you succumb to the wilderness yourself? Before the dog transmutes back into the wolf?

It starts with some pinching of pies from window sills when times are thrifty. Then one day a mountain lion bites your horse's throat out miles from anywhere and after a punishing few miles' walk under the baking sun it's simplicity itself to lasso a passing rider and run off with his mare. You're just doing what you have to do to survive, right? Before you know it you're holding up widows in the street. Evil gets easier and easier and the bounty on your head climbs higher and higher. Them high-and-mighty city folk just don't understand what it's like out here, gol durn it.
I am wondering if there is any difference between what he describes here and what's in New Vegas. Perhaps hardcore mode doesn't quite work like this or is sufficiently different that it doesn't have the "enriching' gameplay benefit described.

Or maybe it was just a dumb idea.
 

CielTynave

New member
Nov 21, 2010
13
0
0
the antithesis said:
Or maybe it was just a dumb idea.
Pretty much that. Some comments on the EP article for RDR called bullshit right away, saying he'd just complain about it if the game did have those mechanics. Then NV comes and has them, and of course, that's exactly what happened.
 

samaugsch

New member
Oct 13, 2010
595
0
0
the antithesis said:
ChupathingyX said:
Also a while ago Yahtzee complained about Red Dead Redemption and I clearly remember him writing in an Extra Punctuation article that RDR would've been a lot better if you had to eat and drink while in the desert. New Vegas does exactly that and now he's complaining about it?
Ah. Fourteen pages and you're the only one who made note of this. Good show, sir.

Indeed, Mr. Croshaw did suggest this very thing [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/columns/extra-punctuation/7699-Extra-Punctuation-Red-Dead-Redemption] in his Extra Punctuation column.
I thought he just complained about soda dehydrating you.
 

Random7

New member
Feb 8, 2010
9
0
0
Hey Yahtzee, I hope you're aware that pop actually dehydrates you which is why it does that. I don't think it is very fair to complain about a game for something that you weren't aware of.
 

Continuity

New member
May 20, 2010
2,050
0
0
Sir John the Net Knight said:
There are three constants in man's life. Death, Taxes, and Bethesda games that will bug out and crash.
You're forgetting the fourth constant, smug gits (like me) who let everyone else do the beta testing and buy the GOTY edition in a sale with bundled DLC for £15 in a couple of years.
 

theif519

New member
Jan 9, 2011
4
0
0
Fallout is my favorite Post-Apocalyptic series... oh wait, well, it's one of the only ones that can pull it off. I started with Fallout 3, then went back to play Fallout 1 and 2. I enjoyed 1 and 2's story line over 3, but 3 was more addicting and I beat 1 twice and 2 three times, while I thoroughly 3 over 8 times. New Vegas, on the other hand, has a lot to offer, and to be honest, if I was first introduced to New Vegas without all of the glitches, I would've not been able to play Fallout 3 at all. Fallout: New Vegas has an exciting story line and sub-quests. Finding the guy who killed you and all, it's pretty fun. Until you can't enter the Strip because of an infamous glitch which took me 2 weeks of having my auto-save deleted, only to find out that I needed to find an Old Cowboy Hat to enter... still, I'm still shocked that they released DLC without thoroughly patching New Vegas. Anyway, New Vegas got a 8/10 from me, and got 2 taken off for the excessive glitching and bugs.