Maybe they know about it but ZP is not what I would call a high level of intellectual discussion on game design.BlueInkAlchemist said:Do developers not know about Zero Punctuation? Or are the production teams really that thick?
The game industry was built on the sequel model. No Mario series, no Zelda series, only the original Prince of Persia, only one Madden, NHL games that, like it or not, sell. People will buy franchises they trust.Vlane said:Yeah right. Good joke.ShadowKirby said:Nope, the game industry would be dead.Wasder said:A world without sequels... A good thing?
A more pragmatic solution would be for the industry to move towards episodic gaming and DLC, perhaps with a rental model of consumption. After all, we accept Soap Operas going on for decades without closure, provided that story arcs within the soap get some temporary resolution, rested, then resurface after we have been distracted by the actions of other characters. It seems simple enough to me. Graphics engines will eventually become standardized and what you are paying for in a game will be all the actual content: story, characterization, sets, lighting, music, foley, costumes, etc.PLabrozzi said:Wow, the world would be better without sequels. But I'm not heading for law or medical school, so bring em on anyway.
The uneducated masses can get it for PC if they don't have a PS2. Just about any halfway-decent PC today can run it. And if they complain about the "shitty graphics", then they're probably not the type of people who would appreciate it.cainx10a said:"Remakes will carry the death penalty!" But but, what about the legion of uneducated nerds who never played FF7, can I has remake ? .
They get banned for posting "first!" which adds absolutely nothing to the conversation, and/or posting before the amount of time it would take to watch the movie (the thread starts at the same time the video is posted).KaiRai said:I gotta say, a lot of people banned for strange things!
Exactly. Honestly the only sequel/remake (whatever you want to call the series) I really hate is FIFA and every other sport game. I understand a new one every generation, but is there any reason to release a new one every year? Other than the money they make of course. Honestly they would be better off just releasing DLC which changes the year/updates player names/team shirts.mark_n_b said:Yes! A world without sequels would be a beautiful place. Companies wouldn't deign to drop the coolest of IP's involving people who bust spirits just because they are only interested in "sequel and franchise properties" and we would get much more innovation and variation.
It wouldn't exist because every Final Fantasy past the first is (kinda, not really, but technically) a sequel. I can't pick up a Final Fantasy game anymore because it really makes me feel like I'm playing a rehash of a rehash. I mean, they're up to what? Thirteen? 21 if you count, The Two Crystal Chronicles games, The three Tactics games, DoC, X-2, and My Life as a King. Are they going for an unbreakable record or something? SE would just have to make actual names for their games now.cainx10a said:"Remakes will carry the death penalty!" But but, what about the legion of uneducated nerds who never played FF7, can I has remake ? .
That is correct.willard3 said:They get banned for posting "first!" which adds absolutely nothing to the conversation, and/or posting before the amount of time it would take to watch the movie (the thread starts at the same time the video is posted).KaiRai said:I gotta say, a lot of people banned for strange things!
Yes, Yes it is. That is a terrible thing.AyaReiko said:But if there were no remakes or sequels, Capcom would have gone out of business at least a decade ago.
...
Wait, I wonder if that's really a bad thing...