Zero Punctuation: Let It Die
- Thread starter Yahtzee Croshaw
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Welp that Hillary jab is certain to rustle somebodies jimmies out there. Back to the game, it looks like Yahtzee actually may have enjoyed it a little. If it wasn't free to play I might actually be interested. Though to be honest I kind of hope this is the year that free to play games finally crash and burn.
- Apr 1, 2009
- 15,499
- 4,277
- 118
- Gender
- Whatever, just wash your hands.
A trump refrence at the end would have worked better. Hillary ran a good campaign, trump failed his way into winning. Mostly because he could say he was an outsider and apparently president is the only job that we want negative qualifications for.
I think we can actually do a dictionary of words ruined by games. Let's see... advantage, bastardize, clone, daring, ... loot, motion, near-death, online, perjorative, QTE, ... , vindication, warrant, Xbox [One launch], Yoga, Zombie. You can fill in the blanks yourself.
FTFY.Worgen said:
OT: For a free game, Let It Die is good mindless fun if you like Souls-ish gameplay, Dead Rising-ish weapons, and being able to make enemies explode with blood just by punching them.
- Apr 1, 2009
- 15,499
- 4,277
- 118
- Gender
- Whatever, just wash your hands.
trump ran a shit campaign and you know it, it was fail from the first day. But some people are stupid and like fail if fail talks big which he did. He failed into it and you fucken know it.Madmanonfire said:
Yeah I have a love hate relationship with Let it Die, on one hand the gameplay is fun and the weapons are really diverse but dodging sucks and grinding for money is a *****. Still had a lot of fun with it.
Not really. Every losing candidate in the past 16 years has had a greater percentage of the popular vote than Trump, save McCain: 45.7% to Trump's 46%) In a sane nation, where the DNC listened to its constituents and nominated its overwhelmingly more popular and largely scandal-free candidate, Trump would never have stood a damn chance. The story of 2016 isn't that Trump won, its that Hillary lost.Worgen said:
It's funny, that exact same strategy is what allowed the Democrats to win in 2008 and 2012.
[HEADING=3]2016[/HEADING]
--Trump
[li]Popular Votes: 62.9 mil[/li]
[li]Popular Vote Percentage: 46%[/li]
[li]EC Votes: 304[/li]
--Clinton
[li]Pop Votes: 65.8[/li]
[li]Pop Vote Percent: 48%[/li]
[li]EC: 227[/li]
[HEADING=3]2012[/HEADING]
--Obama
[li]Pop Votes: 65.9[/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 51%[/li]
[li]EC: 332[/li]
--Romney
[li]Pop Votes: 60.9[/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 47.2%[/li]
[li]EC: 206[/li]
[HEADING=3]2008[/HEADING]
--Obama
[li]Pop Votes: 69.5[/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 52.9%[/li]
[li]EC: 365[/li]
--McCain
[li]Pop Votes: 59.9[/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 45.7%[/li]
[li]EC: 173[/li]
[HEADING=3]2004[/HEADING]
--Bush
[li]Pop Votes: 62.0[/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 51.3%[/li]
[li]EC: 286[/li]
--Kerry
[li]Pop Votes: 59.0[/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 48.3%[/li]
[li]EC: 251[/li]
[HEADING=3]2000[/HEADING]
--Bush
[li]Pop Votes: 50.4 [/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 47.9%[/li]
[li]EC: 271[/li]
--Gore
[li]Pop Votes: 50.9[/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 48.4%[/li]
[li]EC: 266[/li]
--Trump
[li]Popular Votes: 62.9 mil[/li]
[li]Popular Vote Percentage: 46%[/li]
[li]EC Votes: 304[/li]
--Clinton
[li]Pop Votes: 65.8[/li]
[li]Pop Vote Percent: 48%[/li]
[li]EC: 227[/li]
[HEADING=3]2012[/HEADING]
--Obama
[li]Pop Votes: 65.9[/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 51%[/li]
[li]EC: 332[/li]
--Romney
[li]Pop Votes: 60.9[/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 47.2%[/li]
[li]EC: 206[/li]
[HEADING=3]2008[/HEADING]
--Obama
[li]Pop Votes: 69.5[/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 52.9%[/li]
[li]EC: 365[/li]
--McCain
[li]Pop Votes: 59.9[/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 45.7%[/li]
[li]EC: 173[/li]
[HEADING=3]2004[/HEADING]
--Bush
[li]Pop Votes: 62.0[/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 51.3%[/li]
[li]EC: 286[/li]
--Kerry
[li]Pop Votes: 59.0[/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 48.3%[/li]
[li]EC: 251[/li]
[HEADING=3]2000[/HEADING]
--Bush
[li]Pop Votes: 50.4 [/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 47.9%[/li]
[li]EC: 271[/li]
--Gore
[li]Pop Votes: 50.9[/li]
[li]Pop Percent: 48.4%[/li]
[li]EC: 266[/li]
Oh you, console controls!
When will you ever stop being funny on consoles and so aggravatingly horrendous in your infection of the PC Master Race's games?
I've caught myself sniggering more and more at Zero Punctuation as of late.
By Jove, I thinks he's coming back into another apex again.
Ta, Sir.
When will you ever stop being funny on consoles and so aggravatingly horrendous in your infection of the PC Master Race's games?
I've caught myself sniggering more and more at Zero Punctuation as of late.
By Jove, I thinks he's coming back into another apex again.
Ta, Sir.
Hillary who also in 2008 was known to be pro establishment.Worgen said:
Hillary who would change her views based on her donors.
Hillary who would pretend to back people if she thought it could get her more votes.
Hillary who could've lost to Bernie Sanders if she didn't have Democratic Establishment.
Hillary who had an easier time dismissing Black Lives Matter.
Hillary who probably only needed Wall Street to win New York.
Hillary who probably cost us our first progressive female president, Elizabeth Warren, by running.
That Hillary ran a good campaign?
Also Larry Lessig could've beaten Hillary too if Main Stream Media didn't quickly silence him.
- Apr 1, 2009
- 15,499
- 4,277
- 118
- Gender
- Whatever, just wash your hands.
Pro establishment doesnt mean anything by itself.Jacked Assassin said:
I have yet to see a politician who doesn't reflect the views of doners.
citation needed.
I've heard she stepped down in 08 for obama so she could run when his term was up so there might have been a preexisting deal kinda thing.
citation needed
Trump was losing new york no matter what. Aside from the fact they know about his crimes, new york tends to go dem.
citation needed.
Except Hilary played right into Trump's hands by saying "I am running to be the first women president! I am an outsider!"Worgen said:
especially when she's lived in white house for 8 years and was Senator and Secretary of State ever since. She should have used her qualification as a positive but decided to go with the opposite.
Also, her campaign focus was more on "Why we can't let Donald Trump win" more than why she's qualified for the job.
If Trump's campaign was a failure, I'd argue Hilary's campaign to be even more so.
Fuck's sakes, it's been maybe an hour and this thread reminds me of the R&P section.
Wait, what? This wasn't even a term BEFORE video games. I get that video games ruined a video game term, but I think Yahtzee was going for normal real world words that video games ruined, not gaming words gaming ruined. Dunno if I'm making sense when I say that thoughIgor-Rowan said:
Okay fine, I was too lazy to write Quick Time Events, so let's say it's a combo and VG ruined 3 words: Quick because of games with action too fast paced, time because of time limits, and events because of E3.Elvis Starburst said:
Now everybody's happy.
- Apr 1, 2009
- 15,499
- 4,277
- 118
- Gender
- Whatever, just wash your hands.
I don't remember her ever claiming to be a political outsider. Shes been invovled in politics too long to be able to make that claim, then again every politician tries to claim that since for some reason we want people with no experience leading us.mysecondlife said:
There are lots of good reasons on why he shouldn't ever have been allowed to win. Hell, he pretty much was advocating rape. But, its Hillary, for some reason she has a ton of political baggage despite the fact that her scandle sheet isn't really that different from most long time politicians. But she has been constantly hit for it since she was the first lady. The baggage is more from the never ending barrage rather than any of them really being that noticeable.
