(just a reminder that we are arguing for the sake of arguingmspencer82 said:I guess you missed the part where I implied that Star Wars has nonsensical plots too. Alternate Earths is one thing, the many worlds theory makes anything possible I suppose, but some of the things in Metal Gear would have to take place in Bizarro World. Vamp runs up walls, Fortune deflects bullets without the aid of technology (even the technology was stupid), I could go on all day.Jumplion said:(please note that i have not read your previous arguments, so i gathered what i could. Please correct me if i'm wrong)
Wow, that is extremely retarted IMHO. So the MGS series is automatically irrelivant and the plot is poorly written because it takes place on Earth in an alternate 20th and 21st century and has impossible technologies and genetics because it is in an ALTERNATE Earth. But Star Wars is completely relevant and can be believed because it doesn't take place in our galaxy, and even though the physics are completely impossible (faster than light travel, light sabers, ray guns) it is apparantly better story writing than MGS (not saying SW has bad writing, they are both equal)? Personally, i had no idea what the hell was going on in the SW episodes i watched in the order of release.
The bad science was just something we got into discussing. In one of my earlier posts I cited the repetitive dialog, game-to-game retcons, and of course bad science as just a few examples of Kojima's terrible writing. There's also the face that nearly everyone has a drawn out death scene with "last words" that could fill seven pages of the script, and that's regardless of whether they stay dead or not. The only exception to the rule were the Cobras in MGS3, I think the Fury was the only one who talked a lot before his death but even that was short compared to some of the deaths in this series.
Surprisingly, I like the Metal Gear series. The gameplay is usually fun, and the plot is usually worth a few laughs.
Really? Excuses that MGS is poorly written (or something along those lines) because Vamp can run on walls? If Ninjas in the 10th century (or whatever century the games are based in) can run on walls why can't a seemingly immortal person in the FUTURE (for ninjas) with technology run on walls and not be classified as bad writting?
And Fortune was called "Lady Luck" for a reason, seeing as how every grenade thrown at her was a dud and shots always missed. It goes away from the technology side of MGS and goes into a "magical feel" or soemthing like that.
I just don't understand how you can impliy that the MGS series has bad writing. It's much more believeable than a ring that somehow destroys everything in range, or faster than light travel, or magical demons that pop up and a ninja with a huge arsenal of weapons to hack and slash at them.
Hell, any game could be labeled as being poorly written. Eternal Sonata, about a composer dreaming of a world in peril or whatever. WhAt ThE hElL iS tHaT/
If Kojima can't be creative with his story without being accused of writing poorly then MGS should have never been, and i would rue that day.
Just one more thing (not directed to you) for everyone who says that Kojima is a frustrated film maker or that he should make movies instead of games because of all the cutscenes, A)Fuck you and B)Which would you rather have? A Movie with no interactivness whatsoever or a Game that is like a movie, but you can be part of the experience?
My money's on the game.
@Indigo_dingo: Yes, precisely. Well done.