God damn it, why did you have to remind me of that video? That was one of his worst, right next to Sony and Other M.Nomanslander said:
He's wrong on some points though.Josh_v2.0 said:I'm not going to dig through eleven pages to find out, but if somebody hasn't told you yet, have a look at strawmeneverywhere's comments on that page.luckey said:sorry yahtzee, bob's argument makes more sense to me in this case then your does, so it looks like i'm gonna get this one
http://screwattack.com/videos/TGO-Episode-40-Heavens-to-Metroid
I've responded to that video, so I'll leave it here;BlueInkAlchemist said:So the best way to enjoy a game that's trying not to be an FPS is to play an FPS? Huh.
When was Samus established as having a "bold, independent spirit"? I don't remember that being mentioned at all in any of the games other than the fact that you, the player, are controlling her and she's completely alone. She blindly followed our orders even if it meant smacking into a wall repeatedly when our phones rang or falling into an acid pit when we mis-judged a jump she probably could have handled were she in control of her own body.
This sounds so much like so many other arguments against Other M I'm wondering if Yahtzee either got bored with the ZP enterprise now that his novel's out or has just been too busy to form salient points that he's cribbed notes from other sources. Not that I myself would ever do such a thing [http://gameoverthinker.blogspot.com/2010/09/episode-40-heavens-to-metroid.html].
Funny? Yes. Accurate? No idea. I'm too poor to own a Wii. But I find myself kinda confused by all of the hatred. Maybe it's just me.
While all true, none of these examples have the presence of deep rooted fears and internal doubts about herself for Samus. They're small moments of clarity, or reaching out distantly into the past.SAMAS said:I think the main problem with the "As I see it" argument is the fact that we haven't seen much. Moviebob points it out in his vid, and he has a point. The Metroid games have given us only the tiniest glimpses of Samus' character. We see her running around alone shooting hostile wildlife, and most people have assumed she must always be like that.
Now I know that Spoony said he disregarded the official manga (seriously, it was shown on Nintendo's website), probably because it disagreed with him. But even taking that out, we have two, maybe three looks into her actual character.
Bob mentioned Metroid II, where she decide not to kill the Metroid Hatchling. But he forgot to mention most of Metroid Fusion, the one time she actually talked to someone else. In this case, the ship AI she named after... guess who? Adam Malkovitch. Samus mentions that she gave it that name because it reminded her of him. She also mentions Adam (both the AI and the man) having an authoritative personality. She also mentions a somewhat secret code ("Any objections, Lady?") between the two of them, hinting at a relationship that was noticeably closer than simply Officer and Subordinate.
A possible third moment is that shot in Super Metroid's intro where she is shown shaking hands with the scientist she gives the Hatchling over to. It's not exactly something an emotionless soldier-type would do.
There are clear indications of the characterisation we are supposed to have drawn for Samus from the limited details previously provided though. The original Metroid manual states outright that she is considered to be the best of the bounty hunters, who are only brought in when existing Federation forces are simply not up to snuff. Even before she saved the galaxy seven times over she was literally considered the single hardest person in the universe.SAMAS said:1: He accuses the video of obsession with Sexualization, when the whole point of the video was that the charactization of Samus that people say has been "Raped" (actually said by Spoony) is an entirely fan-made projection. The only mentions of Sexuality are in respone to the accusations made by many critics and fanboys alike, even on this very thread (probably this very page).
If you ever get around to owning one, I'd suggest checking Other M out. The story isn't the hardest to predict, but there are a few moments of absolute characterization that rival that of any protagonist, especially when Ridley shows up, and you see Samus confront something that by rights she should have killed long, long ago, yet still hangs around to terrorize her.BlueInkAlchemist said:Funny? Yes. Accurate? No idea. I'm too poor to own a Wii. But I find myself kinda confused by all of the hatred. Maybe it's just me.
He said "think."LazarusRaven said:http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.234132-Yahtzee-Leaving-the-Escapist-Reviewingsacredwolf82 said:His special episode comes out the same day as the international release of Civ 5.
What do you guys think?
Portal, Half-Life 2, TimeSplitters, Amnesia: The Dark Descent, Thief: The Dark Project, Deus Ex, System Shock II, Bioshock and a lot of others would all like a word with you.Lordofthesuplex said:Also Bob has a point about his views on the FPS genre. I've seen examples of it myself. Elitist pricks who only think a game matters if it's like Halo or Modern Warfare. (Granted I don't agree with what he says about the Metroid Prime Trilogy and even I admit there are some modern day FPSs I still like but that doesn't change the fact that the industry is littered with too much of them and a good chunk of them don't really try and stand out from one another)
Debates don't work like that, it was the biggest and most glaring problem with the game and everyone knows it.MasterRahl said:The story: I'm not getting into it, I'll just say MovieBob won.
~Rahl
I need to find that Citizen Kane gif. Like I said in a previous post, this entire debacle, to me, seems like the equivalent of backing out of a serious relationship just you don't have to commit. Because, y'know, there are things to LOSE at that point. It also says to me that the gaming industry has done a VERY bad job of giving us protagonists that have actual problems, flaws, and insecurities. So when one DOES come around we reject it for no real reason.BehattedWanderer said:If you ever get around to owning one, I'd suggest checking Other M out. The story isn't the hardest to predict, but there are a few moments of absolute characterization that rival that of any protagonist, especially when Ridley shows up, and you see Samus confront something that by rights she should have killed long, long ago, yet still hangs around to terrorize her.BlueInkAlchemist said:Funny? Yes. Accurate? No idea. I'm too poor to own a Wii. But I find myself kinda confused by all of the hatred. Maybe it's just me.
You referenced Bob's bit, and in fairness he did cover most of what caused the untold fervor of anger. How a woman who's openly expressing her motherly instincts is a weak personality I'll never understand, but I suppose in context of the lumbering block of meat that comprises most protagonists, having concern that naturally occurs for something you want to protect is a risible trait. In her reflections Samus sounds like an actual person having gone through a traumatic event, which she clearly has, so it's a bit like crying bullshit that she shouldn't emote when the most recent thing she was emotionally attached gets smeared across the walls.
And you seem quite quick, Yahtzee, to cry out that the whole father-figure complex that Samus has with Adam is character weakening when you yourself, multiple times over your continual fawning over that aloof aristocratic prat of a prince, have said that it was central to the character's development and personality. For a character like Samus, raised by the Chozo, lacking actual familial ties insofar as we know, how is forming a relationship with a man she would admire as if he were a father demeaning to the character? The little we know of Samus from the minutia of expository story we have about her upbringing is mostly that of loneliness, hardship, and struggle. Compared to most of your oft-referenced targets for praise, Samus actually has a reason to be alone, resourceful, and detached from the things around her, yet when she forms an attachment only to watch the object or person of her affections destroy itself for her sake, she's supposed to take it all in stride?
At least stay consistent in your fanboy-panderings, would you mind?