Kenkaku said:
Let me just get it out of the way before more uninspired 'good one' posts appear that I want Yahtzee to go back and watch some of his very first ZP/FR videos. I was wondering what was so different, in a bad way, about his latest films and I discovered that it's because he went from a very proper and professional sounding critic to an angry videogame nerd... and we already have one of those.
Essentially, he should stop yelling and sounding so excited as much as he should just sound like a carefree reviewer.
If you don't believe me, watch this video again, then watch the Heavenly Sword video.
You know, I really can't see what the massive difference is between his new videos and his older ones, other than the hypertrophy of his talking speed. I just watched the Tomb Raider video for comparison. It's a broadly similar game and many of the criticisms he makes are the same in both reviews. Honest to God, what is the difference? Where is this percieved quantity of professionalism to be found?
I'm sure you checked your cynicism hat in the mirror before stepping into the thread (judging from your platitudinous use of "uninspired", you're not new to critiquing things online), but let me scratch off your "uninspired" criticism that it was better Back In The Day and give two reasons why the style of ZP has altered slightly over the last few months:
1. Finding your feet. The Heavenly Sword review was the third proper ZP review Yahtzee had ever made, and nobody settles completely into an established style after three episodes of anything. Slight stylistic shifts and revisions are evident in everything just starting out.
2. Familiarity. As both the creator and the audience of something become more familiar with the conventions of the piece, their outlook will change. The appeal of freshness and innovation wears away somewhat, and expectations begin to set in.
These two things happen with every episodic show, column, comic etc. Telling Yahtzee to fix it is futile, because you can't erase your past experiences with ZP, and neither can he. ZP is essentially reaching the stage where Yahtzee is stuck between a rock and a hard place: repeat what's proven and people will accuse him of becoming stale and repetitive. Try and alter the formula and people (like you) will complain that the essence of the show has been loss, corrupted or altered too far.
As for this notion that he's stopped being a professional critic and has become an angry nerd- which Yahtzee have you been reading and watching? ZP has never,
ever been a professional review show. As pure reviews, even the early episodes you cherish are utterly terrible, and I'm speaking as a reviewer myself with years of experience. I get sick of people on forums judging ZP on traditional reviewer criteria. The driving force of ZP has always been humour, and the standard formula is that the game in question becomes the springboard for observational humour that attacks a larger gaming issue, whether it's money-spinning remakes, developer idiocy/laziness, classic design mistakes, reviewer hype or gamers themselves. Yahtzee is still doing this, and in many ways he's got it down to more of a tee than ever.
ZP has varied quality, like everything else. It's incredibly rare to find anything episodic that maintains the same high quality throughout every episode. I personally found this a very entertaining episode, although oft times I've felt the opposite when most people were praising the episode in question. Such are the vicissitudes of comedy. People shouldn't pretend that there's been some terminal slip in quality or ethos just because they didn't laugh so much this week.