Calling Grim Fandango a 'ze best game ever' has as much solid ground as calling Uwe Boll a movie genius, because there's no such thing as a perfect game, get it trough your heads. Grim Fandago suffered from two annoyings things; one being the fucking controls, two that this game was mostly based on grabbing every object you have and using it in hopes it'll work. I'm sorry, but that doesn' make the game great, it makes it irrataiting and just based on dumb luck, because you'll never think of using any of the objects you have, because it's logically stupid. Like drinking gold made liquir to get a metal detector, or say using balloons filled with strange liquid to destroy a machien. You woulden't think of this, because again, it's illogical. If I want a real puzzle based game I'll play Siberia, but Grim Fandango just makes you relay on dumb luck, that's not a puzzle game, that's just embarrasing.xqxm said:Name one game that has done horror right?Kanashe said:xqxm said:In my honest opinion, no game has made horror/psychological thriller GOOD. I might even go as far as to say that no film has made psychological horror/thrillers good ever, either.
If there is something i dislike more than coming home to find a hobo rubbing his balls all over my bed, it's the japanese influence on a game. Yes, their stock characters, clichees and TERRIBLE TERRIBLE dialog writing/voice acting is what made me have to FORCE myself through Silent Hill 2, damn well trying to enjoy the story and get immersed, but i failed immensively. Maybe if i had played it when i came out, i would actually have enjoyed it, but that's probably because i was 10 at the time.
You all just wait until i can cough up the dough to keep a dev team afloat, and release an immersive psychological horror game that will redefine the genre and piss on your dead cat.
yes, this is what we should assume is going to happen. that, or nobody will buy it because people generally don't support the good games (a lá grim fandango).
bye.
Also, Grim Fandango wasn't all that perfict, so suck it.
Seeing as how you don't think Grim Fandango was one of the best games ever, i'm half expecting you to bring up some shitty asshat game like Dead Space, so congratulations for proving to me that some people actually shouldn't be allowed to partake in popular votes.
Cheers!
p.s. I think even you can agree that Grim Fandango was several steps above for example NHL 1999 in the great order of things, but people will rather stick with safe, familiar immensively product placed and sold out games, than to try something that's a little off. I think that's sad, that's all.
I think it's just a remix of the ZP theme..Ericd140 said:Any one know the name of the song in between the end of the episode and the fan part? the vote area of the episode?
Actually, the game is not that hard. You won't Gamefaqs to complete it)yourbeliefs said:I downloaded the demo off of PSN and gave it a try. Of course it was insufferably short, and didn't even show off the 2nd person aspect. I don't think I'll be venturing any more into the game, as I can't even rent it and would have to go all in and buy it all or episode packages. A somewhat intriguing game, but I was never big on Adventure games (which is too bad because I love engrossing stories) nor do I like paying for ones where I have to let Gamefaqs guide me through that game's particular moon logic.
Gave away the ending...Please, there's a thing called youtube and wikipedia. Ya don't have to be a genius to look that shit up.Hiroshi Mishima said:Wow... see, this is exactly why I ignore most of these threads. And it isn't just Spyalt, although he was certainly a good part of it. People keep saying stuff like "Hur hur hur, awesome review" but I get the feeling they say that for EVERY review he does. Likewise, I'm seeing people who are contradicting themselves saying "This was a good review, it's just a shame Yahtzee only does videos for games he can't play." Because clearly, he sucks so badly at a game that he can't beat it, even though he gave away part of the ending in the freaking review!
My gods the ammount of anger and hatred his reviews spring forth. If anyone actually believes that his reviews are just for humour/entertainment and aren't actually reviews, then they're either very ignorant or aren't very observant. Yahtzee's reviews are, by and large, meant to be entertaining, this is very true. However, he's also generally being quite honest as to his opinion of the games, and their flaws. I have played probably half of the games he's reviewed and I agree whole-heartedly with him on almost all of them. The ones I haven't played myself, I've seen enough of (through friends or simply what I've seen of the gameplay) to know that he's pretty spot-on with those as well.
Just because the guy dislikes a game someone thinks is "the shit" or whatever kids say these days, doesn't mean he sucks at games, and it doesn't mean he's a hack with nothing going besides the humour. He's making a freaking point, and if you can't step back and look at what it is he's saying, you're either too blind to admit that it isn't perfect, or you're in self denial.
Also, the "if you think it's bad it is only because you suck" argument is really pathetic. Do you seriously think that people honestly always hate something because they suck at it? So... you're saying that I hate MGS 2 because I suck at it? Not because it had terrible writing and a lot of unnecessarilly confusing plot points? Or that I dislike MZM because I can't play it? Despite the fact the end of the game is part of the reason I dislike it? That sounds an awful lot like someone who says "if you don't like a book/movie it's because you can't understand it." Wow, thanks for saying that. I'm so glad to know that the reason I dislike Saw is because I don't understand what is so fun and amusing about mindless gore and poorly written scripts.
..sorry, went off on a tangent there.
ANYWAYS.. the review. I enjoyed the review, mainly because I can agree with him on several points. Not because I've played Siren Blood Curse, but because I've seen them done in other games and know the feeling. Escorting someone who dies anyways, being unable to figure out what the hell you're supposed to do when everything just gets you killed, broken and confusing storylines that make little sense until you've seen someone else piece it all together and try to explain it... Watching him comment about the endless dying from wrong choices reminded me of an old PSX game called Dead End 13 or Brain Dead 13 or something like that... it was by and large a cinematic game, which I usually enjoy, but about half-way through it got to the point where nothing I did got me to the next room, so I eventually gave up.
EDIT: I meant to also say that even though the review didn't make me laugh my ass off, like some of them do, I still really enjoyed it. He made a lot of valid points.
That's because since gaming turned into a pop-culture phenomenon and it got a mainstream audience, the majority of gamers are borderline brain-dead. They tend to forget that game reviews are supposed to be a buyer's guide to help you choose between the different titles and not the place where they'll indulge their fanboy fantasies. All reviews contrary to popular opinion tend to bring that much hatred, but Yahtzee's even more, because of the style.My gods the ammount of anger and hatred his reviews spring forth
Well, why watch it if it causes you that much annoyance, I mean seriously do you not see the irony, you complain about him ranting about a game, in essence you're doing exactly the same.Kanashe said:If Yahztee in all his douchebaggery is a reviewer, than George Bush is Hitlers reincarnation. He doesn't review/make a point, he goes on a fucking bash spree/overhype ride, because he belives he knows about games, while he knows shit. By the looks of it, I'll say that he didn't even play the original Siren for the PS2 wich was by far worse, also with him bringing all these points, any person with half a skull who played the PS2 version, can counter him. He doesn't make a point, he just rants like a fucking idiot, and by far we have thousand of thoes on youtube. I know that there isn't anything like a perfect game, everyone person who's IQ isn't below 25 knows that. But Yahztee brings points wich again can be countered. He was never 'spot on', I don't care what any of the sheep or people say, all of his reviews are just a simple rant sprees, with each point can be countered by logical answers. Also if you actually liked Saw, then you deserve to be shot.
i agreeMagnikai said:That was godawful....it wasn't even really that funny
I highly doubt that.PirateKing said:Anyone think Yahtzee reads what we write?
I respectfully disagree. I played Siren on the ps2, and returned it the same day. I played Siren on the PS3, and was glad it was just the demo. I didn't expect Yahtzee to review this one, but I can at least agree with what he wrote. I can also respect that he bared through the whole game. That's more than I could do!dianno said:It's amazing people haven't heard of this...it's pretty much the best survival horror game since Silent Hill 2.