Digikid said:
Simply put. To those who do NOT like CAD....screw you as you have no sense of good humor whatsoever and should be make into a paste.
Same to PA lovers. PA is not funny in the LEAST.
Digikid said:
Let see here...I am 30 years old....being surrounded by a bunch of kids here that know nothing of good humor.
You do the math....dude.
You are adorable. You truly, truly are.
I love how, in your first statement, you expect others to find legitimate authenticity in your claims, despite giving no evidence to back them up. As I've said before, those who have had complaints with CAD have given viable, logical reasoning to their complaints, while those defending it have simply made blanket statements that they feel they don't need to defend. If you're going to claim something as vehemently as you are, you damn well better back it up. It's true PA isn't a fantastic webcomic by any means, but I still think it's a fairly good webcomic, while CAD generally lacks in quality.
Honestly, I'm waiting for a CAD fan to say WHY they like CAD and to give it valid defense instead of saying "I like it, get over it." While this IS fine, if you're going to debate the quality of it over the internet, give us some reasoning behind why you think the way you do.
As for your second comment, I think it helps show you as being one of the most precious pre-teen trolls in the world. Stay golden, Digi. Stay golden.
TerraMGP said:
I for one have no reason to sit here and watch a man just start ragging on things anymore.
Yet you have time to come here and argue with people you think are simply kissing his ass. Seems to me like you're making time for the lesser of two options.
TerraMGP said:
What I really find disturbing is that you people can judge him, but I don't hear anyone here praising Jerry Holkins or Mike Krahulik for Childs Play. That was a wonderful thing and I can honestly say the only sad thing is that it is not spreading as far or as fast as it should. But no, you take an expression of someones mixed and confused feelings and use it to say they are a bad person. You don't find it funny thats fine but you all have just as much wrong with you, and I do too.
Holkins and Krahulik's contribution of Child's Play don't really have anything to do with the topic, unless you're aiming this statement at those who are also attacking Penny Arcade. In this case, it still doesn't have anything to do with the topic because, no matter how nice a pair of men Holkins and Krahulik are (and they seem like genuine gentlemen from their encounters with fans and how well they handle and shrug off, or even play with and use as a joke, criticism aimed at them), it still wouldn't effect the quality of their product. If some feel their comic to be of bad quality....well, that's their opinion, just like it is for those who think CAD to be of poor quality. Though, on a whole, I would argue that those who argue for CAD to be of bad quality have much more leeway in defending their opinion, given the evidence.
As for CAD itself, something's caught my attention recently. I don't know how many others have seen it, but Buckley has been placing these little comics on the front page recently.
I...I don't know what to think. Despite it's utter simplicity, I actually think the look of it is far more endearing than the artstyle he uses for the comic proper. It's not especially detailed in for the full figure of the characters, but he actually makes the expressions seem more vivid for them then those in the actual comic. It's....actually not horrible to look at.
And...he tells a joke without being so utterly and unnecessarily wordy. He actually allows, at least in this example, for the visual part of the medium to actually take part in the joke, instead of completely relying upon the script. He keeps it short and simple, and gets immediately down to the jab and leaves it at it.
I'm scared guys.....I....I think I like this....
