Zombie on Human Love Nixed for Walking Dead Season 2

Riff Moonraker

New member
Mar 18, 2010
944
0
0
Buzz Killington said:
Riff Moonraker said:
If they did, he wouldnt have commented that Rick will at least make it through Season 2. Seriously?
Actually, he wrote that because of the original Hollywood Reporter article:

Rick Grimes survives: Grimes (Andrew Lincoln) is one character who will pull through. "That guy's a handsome dude and we're kind of pinning a show on him," says Kirkman. " I don't think we'll get rid of him anytime soon?at least not season two."
It still makes you wonder, though... Sure, they are mixing things up a bit, but the source material is very available, lol...

Either way, October is such a long ways away.
 

mireko

Umbasa
Sep 23, 2010
2,003
0
0
I don't get it, why was this question even asked?

Wait, no, on second thought don't answer that.

[sub]Please.[/sub]
 

Prof. Monkeypox

New member
Mar 17, 2010
1,014
0
0
Was the possibility of Zombie/human love even out there? I've never read/watched the series so I'm asking. This just seems like their trying to quell a rumor that was genuinely terrifying, and was never going to be a problem anyway.
 

K4RN4GE911

New member
Apr 27, 2010
221
0
0
Geo Da Sponge said:
Please tell me we can at least play Timesplitters with them.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but, "Shaun of the Dead" reference much?

OT: Who in the bloody Hell would think that ZombiexHuman relationships would be hot? Kind of weird actually.
 

Marmooset

New member
Mar 29, 2010
895
0
0
JustaGigolo said:
That still doesn't stop that show from just being plain awful.

It makes the Eragon movie adaptation look as faithful as Lassy was.
I dunno if that's the best example to use. I believe if any quality director were given Eragon to work with, they'd try to distance their final product as far away as possible from the plagiaristic pile of pig bile that is the source material.
 

Yokai

New member
Oct 31, 2008
1,982
0
0
No zombie sex? Somehow, I think I can contain my disappointment.

However, I'm still angry they put off the second season for a full year after the first. That's rather awful.
Marmooset said:
JustaGigolo said:
That still doesn't stop that show from just being plain awful.

It makes the Eragon movie adaptation look as faithful as Lassy was.
I dunno if that's the best example to use. I believe if any quality director were given Eragon to work with, they'd try to distance their final product as far away as possible from the plagiaristic pile of pig bile that is the source material.
...but when they did, they somehow managed to make it even worse. It's still not a good example though--Kirkman's got creative control for TWD; it's pretty clear he intended the show to be an alternate continuity from the comics. It's still brilliantly written, regardless of the differences.
 

Delock

New member
Mar 4, 2009
1,085
0
0
"Classic" vampires have always been a bit sexual, but unlike the whole Twilight crap, it wasn't treated as romantic, and served to underline just how twisted they were.

Remember that they were pretty much this idea of a twisted monster that pretended to be human, an action that served to play with the human mind, which was their main focus. Their whole purpose was not to kill you, but to damn you. They went about casually twisting emotions about, be it feelings of romance, anger, paranoia, or just plain discomfort (to get a good taste of just how this plays out, go read the first section of Dracula).

In other words, vampires are creatures based as much in physical fears as in psychological (especially since one of the biggest concerns is that being turned into one is effectively losing your soul).

Zombies (at least the idea of shambling or running corpses acting on instinct rather than voodoo magic) are actually all about the physical scares. Sure there's a bit of the psychological when you involve "infection" into it, but that's only limited to the idea of hurting someone with your death.

Zombies are focused on killing, not on causing problems for the protagonists' mind. There are no zombies (of the type we're discussing here) who are magnificent bastards that work the protagonists to make them fall, so there's no reason for seduction.

Now, one thing that's funny is that originally, the roles of these two undead were actually reversed. Zombies were all about the soul/spirit and dealing with fighting something invincible while trying to keep faith while vampires were about survival.
 

Rad Party God

Party like it's 2010!
Feb 23, 2010
3,560
0
0
Flamezdudes said:
I really want to see this show... unfortunately i'm in the UK. DAMN!
My cousin already watched it and she lives in Spain. BUT I don't know if she saw it on TV or in her PC.

OT: Eeeewwwww... Love with zombies is... just... eeeewwwwwwwwwww... braaaiiiinnnnsssss...

I can't wait for the next season =D
 

Zero=Interrupt

New member
Nov 9, 2009
252
0
0
rickthetrick said:
I love this show, and like that they don't know where the disease came from.
I also like how it's about the fighting to survive, and human interaction, rather than a mindless gorefest.
And hopefully they will never, ever, greenlight "Crossed" for any screen, large or small, because that's all it is.
 

dubious_wolf

Obfuscated Information
Jun 4, 2009
584
0
0
uhhhh? necrophilia?
Gross.
I guess this is a relief? I honestly did think this would be an issue...
 

Corekrash

New member
Aug 26, 2010
69
0
0
chickenlord said:
DUMB! I say it is important to find out how the zombie came to be, yeah its about characters but i still think they should fit it in somewhere. After the last of the zombies die out, or after they finally reach a safe refuge i think we should find out.
I disagree. I could understand them maybe eventually finding out if there hadn't been such an apparently massive death toll, but who is to say anyone that might have known is still around? who is to say anyone that might know how it started even had time to figure it out before it was too late. This early in the story it would feel forced in for them to conveniently find out, "Oh! space parasites, that totally makes sense!" or "Voodoo curse, gotcha" or even the overly done "Man-made super virus that got out of control"

It's my personal viewpoint on this stuff, but unless one of the survivors was at ground zero I don't think they should ever really find out. Besides, if and when they did it would be the same old situation as any other zombie story. Virus, voodoo, virus, space bugs, virus, virus, etc,.... At this point should we even have to demand an explanation? It is usually the same thing every time anyways so what is the point? And how would knowing this help enjoyment of the story arc of the human characters?
 

theklng

New member
May 1, 2008
1,229
0
0
Tom Goldman said:
cairocat said:
Also, why the fuck is this a news article?
That which is news, simply is.
this is the kind of message that puts me off visiting this site (in addition to inane articles, riddled with journalist opinions).
 

sunpop

New member
Oct 23, 2008
399
0
0
I'm quite happy they are gonna stay the course as walking dead so far has been amazing.
 

Tom Goldman

Crying on the inside.
Aug 17, 2009
14,499
0
0
theklng said:
Tom Goldman said:
cairocat said:
Also, why the fuck is this a news article?
That which is news, simply is.
this is the kind of message that puts me off visiting this site (in addition to inane articles, riddled with journalist opinions).
I think you meant to say awesome articles, riddled with awesome opinions? Thanks for the compliment!