Zombie on Human Love Nixed for Walking Dead Season 2

RobCoxxy

New member
Feb 22, 2009
2,036
0
0
What I want to know is what fucking cretin actually thought there should/could be?
 

Konaerix

New member
May 19, 2010
289
0
0
WHO THE HELL WOULD WANT TO SEE THIS!?

It would be like necrophilia, no, it WOULD be necrophilia.
 

Curttehmurt

New member
Feb 11, 2010
27
0
0
If zombie/human didn't happen in the comics what made the interviewer think it would happen on the show? I mean sure that thing with the CDC didn't happen in the comics but this is kinda different.
 

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,778
0
0
chickenlord said:
DUMB! I say it is important to find out how the zombie came to be, yeah its about characters but i still think they should fit it in somewhere. After the last of the zombies die out, or after they finally reach a safe refuge i think we should find out.
Why? In character driven zombie fiction, there's no need to know. It adds nothing to the story. The survivors don't need to know why there are zombies around, just that they need to survive.
 

Grabbin Keelz

New member
Jun 3, 2009
1,039
0
0
Tom Goldman said:
vampire on human is fine, but zombie on human is "awful?" That sounds zombieist to me. On second thought, he's totally right. Bad idea.
Think about this. Before the age of Twilight, did we think of vampires as acceptable romance figures? What if Edward was a zombie and not a vampire, like he wore makeup to cover rotting skin and ate animal brains cuz 'I don't wanna be a monster', would it have really been any different? Okay so maybe zombies don't normally do that, but the same could be said for vampires. Appeal to the masses in the right way and anything can be done, including making zombie on human action.
 

Irony's Acolyte

Back from the Depths
Mar 9, 2010
3,636
0
0
What? No zombie-human romance? What, are zombies not people now? And I'm guessing us zombie lovers are less of people now too? Bunch of ignorant bigots if you ask me...

Grabbin Keelz said:
Tom Goldman said:
vampire on human is fine, but zombie on human is "awful?" That sounds zombieist to me. On second thought, he's totally right. Bad idea.
Think about this. Before the age of Twilight, did we think of vampires as acceptable romance figures? What if Edward was a zombie and not a vampire, like he wore makeup to cover rotting skin and ate animal brains cuz 'I don't wanna be a monster', would it have really been any different? Okay so maybe zombies don't normally do that, but the same could be said for vampires. Appeal to the masses in the right way and anything can be done, including making zombie on human action.
Actually vampires have been a symbol of sexuality for quite some time now. Twilight wasn't the first to come up with the idea. There have been plenty of books and movies dealing with "sexy vampires".

Plus zombies are always rotting corpses that happen to be walking around. Always. With vampires there are some monsterous ones, sure (the original idea of the vampire was this), but there are also ones that fit right into human society without any apparent oddities except for a small appetite, really pale skin, and a rather weird sleep schedule.
 

subtlefuge

Lord Cromulent
May 21, 2010
1,107
0
0
This is a relief, I suppose. I mean, I wasn't expecting anything like this anyway, but whatever.

I'm just glad that AMC hasn't realized that they are too good for basic cable yet. Here's to hoping that they remain oblivious.
 

Corekrash

New member
Aug 26, 2010
69
0
0
The whole "Zombie / human lovin'" question I kind of understand. Afterall, there is actually zombie porn so someone out there is into that (Maybe it is like Necrophilia without the guilt? Because the Zombie may be a rotting corpse, but they are still moving around). But asking if we'll see that in Walking dead? Wtf

That is not the kind of show Walking dead is. Thats more of a D- movie idea like Zombie-stripper or something.
 

Horben

New member
Nov 29, 2009
140
0
0
chickenlord said:
DUMB! I say it is important to find out how the zombie came to be, yeah its about characters but i still think they should fit it in somewhere. After the last of the zombies die out, or after they finally reach a safe refuge i think we should find out.
I agree. Discovering the origin is part of the horror of zombies as a plot device, in traditional Lovecraft fashion. The ultimate understanding of the world one lives in, the acceptance of how things are and what the characters need to do, are also essential parts of any good adventure.
 

chickenlord

New member
May 14, 2008
512
0
0
Corekrash said:
chickenlord said:
DUMB! I say it is important to find out how the zombie came to be, yeah its about characters but i still think they should fit it in somewhere. After the last of the zombies die out, or after they finally reach a safe refuge i think we should find out.
I disagree. I could understand them maybe eventually finding out if there hadn't been such an apparently massive death toll, but who is to say anyone that might have known is still around? who is to say anyone that might know how it started even had time to figure it out before it was too late. This early in the story it would feel forced in for them to conveniently find out, "Oh! space parasites, that totally makes sense!" or "Voodoo curse, gotcha" or even the overly done "Man-made super virus that got out of control"

It's my personal viewpoint on this stuff, but unless one of the survivors was at ground zero I don't think they should ever really find out. Besides, if and when they did it would be the same old situation as any other zombie story. Virus, voodoo, virus, space bugs, virus, virus, etc,.... At this point should we even have to demand an explanation? It is usually the same thing every time anyways so what is the point? And how would knowing this help enjoyment of the story arc of the human characters?
closure...
 

chickenlord

New member
May 14, 2008
512
0
0
Korenith said:
chickenlord said:
DUMB! I say it is important to find out how the zombie came to be, yeah its about characters but i still think they should fit it in somewhere. After the last of the zombies die out, or after they finally reach a safe refuge i think we should find out.
Yes please give us another half assed story about a government funded virus, it'd make the series so much better... oh no wait, that really would be "dumb". Zombies have been explained so many times before that I really don't see the point in trying to come up with another possible reason. Why do people feel like a definite answer is somehow better than mystery? Especially since the reason has absolutely no bearing on the characters and their lives unless they do some stupid "save the world" story line like I Am Legend did at the end (which utterly ruined the movie). Reality is these people would never stumble across the reason so why should the writers manufacture some ridiculous senario where they would?
But in a fictional story i enjoy when a mystery comes to light... it could be at the very end... i dont care, if there was an actual zombie apocalypse and the government couldn't control it, I would really want to know how it all started
 

chickenlord

New member
May 14, 2008
512
0
0
DTWolfwood said:
chickenlord said:
DUMB! I say it is important to find out how the zombie came to be, yeah its about characters but i still think they should fit it in somewhere. After the last of the zombies die out, or after they finally reach a safe refuge i think we should find out.
they never explained it in the Comic, and for 80+ issues, i've never really cared why either. unfortunately these zombies really are dead and aren't living ppl with super rabies, so they can never die out.
in it, the zombie outbreak isnt an infection or disease, its what happens to everyone that dies. Seemingly the act of god.
Knowing how it came to be only matters if the characters have the means or the brains to cure it. which none of them do, so knowing really does nothing for the series.
Even if the zombies are dead they wouldnt last that long, i remember reading an article on the subject matter(unfortunately i am unable to find it at the time) but it said that due to an advanced military power, temperature exposure, and the poor way the zombies spread the disease, the zombie infestation wouldnt last a month or 2.
 

DTWolfwood

Better than Vash!
Oct 20, 2009
3,716
0
0
chickenlord said:
Even if the zombies are dead they wouldnt last that long, i remember reading an article on the subject matter(unfortunately i am unable to find it at the time) but it said that due to an advanced military power, temperature exposure, and the poor way the zombies spread the disease, the zombie infestation wouldnt last a month or 2.
don't really wanna ruin it for you but
the survivors survive for well over a year with the zombie horde still "alive" and strong

Yes but you are trying to use real science in a fictional drama XD that in itself is the wrong way to look at things. I mean thats like trying to justify the things that happen in Lost with physics heh, its better just to go with the flow.

If there was a real zombie outbreak, i.e. the George Romero slow zombies, It would never cause an apocalypse any ways, as it would have been easily contained. There was even an article [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/102413-Professor-Investigates-the-Effect-of-Zombies-on-World-Politics] about its affects on this very website XD
 

chickenlord

New member
May 14, 2008
512
0
0
DTWolfwood said:
chickenlord said:
Even if the zombies are dead they wouldnt last that long, i remember reading an article on the subject matter(unfortunately i am unable to find it at the time) but it said that due to an advanced military power, temperature exposure, and the poor way the zombies spread the disease, the zombie infestation wouldnt last a month or 2.
don't really wanna ruin it for you but
the survivors survive for well over a year with the zombie horde still "alive" and strong

Yes but you are trying to use real science in a fictional drama XD that in itself is the wrong way to look at things. I mean thats like trying to justify the things that happen in Lost with physics heh, its better just to go with the flow.

If there was a real zombie outbreak, i.e. the George Romero slow zombies, It would never cause an apocalypse any ways, as it would have been easily contained. There was even an article [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/102413-Professor-Investigates-the-Effect-of-Zombies-on-World-Politics] about its affects on this very website XD
The original post of that article may be the one i mentioned, or something very similar. But yeah, for the drama of it they dont really have to use real world scenarios but i still would like to find out what happened, and why the government couldnt handle it and stuff like that because... well i find it interesting in any zombie movie/game/book/...etc