Race is a mostly an arbitrary social construct, so it means whatever someone wants it to mean. But normally it would represent a sufficiently distinct group by "blood" or genetics. Traditionally, of course, determined by simple gross appearance: hence the typical concept of white, black, Oriental, Indian, etc.I thought race was more or less tied to the continent? Like we have India and Japan, both ethnic groups and countries sure, but both are Asian. That's the race. Mexico, Canada, US, we're all North Americans.
When someone moves and has a family in another continent, say an Indian moving to the US, their country of origin is still India, but now their children are Asian American, they're not British Asian or African Asian, the race changes based on the continent.
People might also use a much smaller scale and define Scandinavian separately from German or Hutu from Tutsi at the level of race: your typical nationalist would probably do things like talk about the "British race", but the concept is laughable with any awareness of the mixed nature of the people in any geographical area. Race generally is quite hard to really defend, although the above idea generally relating to skin/hair colour and some facial features is by now well embedded in our culture.