There is no reason I would do that.Love your enemies.
There is no reason I would do that.Love your enemies.
Oh god, I remember plenty of those! The 1.0 version of the escapists and cracked.com this more times than I care to count. It's why I didn't bother with the articles 90% of the time. It was just speculative, click baiting, bullcrap.It's why I got really annoyed with the 1.0 version of this site, in their science/technology articles, when they would ALWAYS describe every fucking breakthrough in some pop culture variant "good job they made Skynet, we're all doomed." Totally ignoring the actual GOOD things the tech could be used for, and instead devoting entire articles to doomsaying something, entirely based on a fucking movie plot.
I would generally agree, but when my love of an enemy leads to my detriment or the detriment of others, I have to draw a line. Like people in abusive relationships or toxic work environments, one has to take a stand and refuse to love as long as abuse is the status quo. People as those in that video need to be shut down, not compassion. Their ignorance and willful obtuseness is dangerous; loving them does nothing to address the root of their problem. In fact, they need enough people to NOT love them and call them on their bullshit to finally reflect on their decisions to be experts on shit they know nothing about. I'm not calling for their deaths (we can agree there,) but I'm certainly not going to be complicit in their decisions to endanger everyone around them.I really detest this "framing people with different opinions from you as sub-human and worthy of death" thing that I've been seeing in recent years on the internet.
Especially on reddit and twitter, I've been seeing more and more people grave-dancing, demonizing, making thinly-veiled calls for violence and outright wishing of death upon other people. From both sides.
Please, have some compassion and empathy for your fellow human beings, even if you think they don't have the same for you. Love your enemies.
Yeah I'm not calling for their deaths, but I shed zero tears when I hear they did die.I would generally agree, but when my love of an enemy leads to my detriment or the detriment of others, I have to draw a line. Like people in abusive relationships or toxic work environments, one has to take a stand and refuse to love as long as abuse is the status quo. People as those in that video need to be shut down, not compassion. Their ignorance and willful obtuseness is dangerous; loving them does nothing to address the root of their problem. In fact, they need enough people to NOT love them and call them on their bullshit to finally reflect on their decisions to be experts on shit they know nothing about. I'm not calling for their deaths (we can agree there,) but I'm certainly not going to be complicit in their decisions to endanger everyone around them.
I cannot reason with unreasonable people and neither can you. At some point you just have to accept the fact that there are people out there who will not cooperate no matter what you do. And we should NOT be basing policy on trying to appease the unpleasable.I really detest this "framing people with different opinions from you as sub-human and worthy of death" thing that I've been seeing in recent years on the internet.
Especially on reddit and twitter, I've been seeing more and more people grave-dancing, demonizing, making thinly-veiled calls for violence and outright wishing of death upon other people. From both sides.
Please, have some compassion and empathy for your fellow human beings, even if you think they don't have the same for you. Love your enemies.
I'm not a politician, nor am I an activist. I don't change laws. I don't protest or march. As a result, my sphere of influence is very small.I would generally agree, but when my love of an enemy leads to my detriment or the detriment of others, I have to draw a line.
Losing compassion for your fellow man, no matter the reason, seems like a dangerous road to go down. Perhaps it's the first step of dehumanization. Perhaps soldiers are taught not to shed tears for those that they kill. That's mainly why I think that this direction is a bad one to go in. When you are convinced that you are right and just and moral, and that your opponents are vile and subhuman and unworthy of consideration, then it becomes easy to commit acts of violence.Yeah I'm not calling for their deaths, but I shed zero tears when I hear they did die.
So, empathy for an angry mob, but not for people who they threaten?I'm not a politician, nor am I an activist. I don't change laws. I don't protest or march. As a result, my sphere of influence is very small.
I cannot hope to change the minds of people I've never met, let alone an angry mob. So why should I be angry at them? Why should I hold hate in my heart towards them? How does that help anyone, them or me?
I could understand if this is a situation where a person you know (within your sphere of influence) took an action that harms you, but being outraged at someone hundreds of miles away, though a screen, who you can not directly influence, seems like it's not good for your health.
If these were my children and they were acting badly, I should feel the burden of correcting these people, for it would be my duty to help them. But they are not. I have no duty towards them. Even as a citizen, I have no duty towards changing the minds of my fellow countrymen.
You equate lack of concern for their idiotic behavior with hate. That's your first false assumption. I don't hate them, but I have very little compassion for them anymore. When they willingly run headlong into their own idiocy. As to why I should be angry at them, it's because their idiocy doesn't just hurt them. As I stated in my response to you initially, they are fucking everything up for the rest of us. If you are fine with just looking at all that and just saying "well, bless their hearts, the poor dears" , well I'm not going to say good for you, because that kind of mentality is why they have been able to get away with so much.I cannot hope to change the minds of people I've never met, let alone an angry mob. So why should I be angry at them? Why should I hold hate in my heart towards them? How does that help anyone, them or me?
You know what's not good for my health? Idiotic chucklefucks spreading a god damned plague across the planet. That's what you don't seem to understand, though your phrasing makes me think you might just be trolling, and typing from some high minded opinion, given your tone.I could understand if this is a situation where a person you know (within your sphere of influence) took an action that harms you, but being outraged at someone hundreds of miles away, though a screen, who you can not directly influence, seems like it's not good for your health.
You're right, tell them to stop dehumanizing all of us, and getting us killed due to their fucking idiocy, and I might worry about them again. But as someone who has been called a servant of the devil, and a minion of hell, and a deviant, and sinner, by these very fucking idiots, and had that opinion of theirs, be used to justify them treating me, and people like me like shit, I frankly have zero patience for them. THEY started this shit, by making anyone not them the enemy, on every level, from political, economical, national, and spiritual. They don't see us as fellow human beings, hell they don't even see us as fucking americans. We're all "The Enemy", and they are actively doing things to harm the rest of us, because they want to.Losing compassion for your fellow man, no matter the reason, seems like a dangerous road to go down. Perhaps it's the first step of dehumanization.
Oh blow it out your ass you pretentious fuck.Feeling sorry for your enemies leads to a desire to help them.
Hating your enemies leads to a desire to kill them.
¿Por que no los dos?So, empathy for an angry mob, but not for people who they threaten?
I'm sorry if I upset you.Oh blow it out your ass you pretentious fuck.
I'm not upset, I'm annoyed at your fairly tone deaf platitudes about a situation that has killed roughly 4.2 MILLION people world wide, and roughly 600K in the US alone.I'm sorry if I upset you.
Handled with care, anger is a great motivator. Angry gets shit done.I cannot hope to change the minds of people I've never met, let alone an angry mob. So why should I be angry at them? Why should I hold hate in my heart towards them? How does that help anyone, them or me?
You do appear more concerned with the convenience of the antagonists rather than the rights of their victims.¿Por que no los dos?
Let's not equate anger with hatred. Let's not mistake anger at a ignorance with hatred towards the individuals of which it is comprised. I bear no hatred towards the people in that specific video; I bear anger towards what they blindly stand for and lack the fortitude to question.Thank you all for your responses.
I'm not a politician, nor am I an activist. I don't change laws. I don't protest or march. As a result, my sphere of influence is very small.
I cannot hope to change the minds of people I've never met, let alone an angry mob. So why should I be angry at them? Why should I hold hate in my heart towards them? How does that help anyone, them or me?
I could understand if this is a situation where a person you know (within your sphere of influence) took an action that harms you, but being outraged at someone hundreds of miles away, though a screen, who you can not directly influence, seems like it's not good for your health.
If these were my children and they were acting badly, I should feel the burden of correcting these people, for it would be my duty to help them. But they are not. I have no duty towards them. Even as a citizen, I have no duty towards changing the minds of my fellow countrymen.
What a completely vacuous load of pseudo-philosophy, that could only be spouted by someone trying (very, very badly) to pretend to be "true neutral".Feeling sorry for your enemies leads to a desire to help them.
Hating your enemies leads to a desire to kill them.
It certainly has that stench about it.... This is very Houseman-esque, no?
It is obviously Houseman.What a completely vacuous load of pseudo-philosophy, that could only be spouted by someone trying (very, very badly) to pretend to be "true neutral".
It certainly has that stench about it.
I said, in my first post in this topic:You do appear more concerned with the convenience of the antagonists rather than the rights of their victims.
If all you have to contribute is "both sides" sophistry, then no it is not appreciated here.But clearly my contributions are not appreciated here, so I will leave. Peace be upon you all.