She lives in a famous castle that the tourism board brags about and has its own Wikipedia page. It's like "doxing" Jeff Bezos by reading internet news articles about his new house.
What's even worse is that the "dox" in this case is.. 3 people photographing themselves standing outside the enormous security gate on her mansion holding pro-trans signs.
Harry Potter fans have been photographing themselves in the same place for years.
Meanwhile, her "gender critical" friends over at the BBC interview a serial rapist who uses the exposure to publish a list of specific trans women she wants people to murder.
It really hit me the other day that this isn't just a war on trans people (although it is) it's also a generational war. For the first time, there is a generation of young trans people who have been able to communicate with one another via the internet, and who have developed the socially unacceptable idea that they deserve a degree of genuine societal inclusion rather than the insincere façade of tolerance older trans people have learned to accept. But because young trans people don't have a lot of cultural capital, we get this entirely one sided debate between old white women (and ageing, increasingly unfunny comedians) and whatever they
imagine trans kids are talking about, because they're so out of touch they don't know.
Imagine being a fucking billionaire, living the kind of absolute decadent, luxurious existence once reserved for royalty (except with even fewer responsibilities) and utterly divorced from any comprehensible form of hardship or suffering, and yet spending your time worrying about what a bunch of teenagers (who have probably lived extremely hard lives in their short time on this earth) are saying on the internet.
Whatever sympathy I ever had for JK Rowling is dried up at this point. Being that rich is already a crime against humanity, but if you're going to do it at least have the decency not to intrude into the lives of real people.