Don't get me started on the unarmed, unarmored, people protesting for a more politically and economically equitable country with equal protection under the law, and an end to police brutality, who somehow always end up on the receiving end of all that high-end military gear cops get. You know, opposed to the MEAL Team Six members and their tacticool cosplay who don't actually pose a threat to US oligarchs, and therefore get treated with kid gloves.And don't get me started on the state-fair going lard asses eating fried butter and carrying ARs thinking they can take on the SEALs. Its so absurd 2nd amendment nuts honestly think they have a chance of taking on the Federal or even state Governments.
The very event this topic discusses, showcases the discrepancy between how cops treat people when they aren't a threat, and when they actually are. Or, did you just miss that whole part where cops spent an hour and a half outside beating the shit out of terrified parents, while the gunman was still in the school blasting away kids?
As far as I'm concerned we can have a conversation about gun control in this country, when I can call the cops to respond to an emergency without fearing I just signed a black neighbors' death warrant. And I'll personally make goddamn sure the centerpiece of that conversation will be how any forthcoming gun control legislation won't disproportionately target black Americans, because the history of gun control in the US is so intricately tied into its history of white supremacy the two cannot exist without the other, that continues to be the case today, and the people you'd expect to enforce gun control in the US are the violent white supremacists in the first fucking place.
And second up will be how gun ownership isn't even a strong or reliable predictor for gun violence, or even violent crime in sum, while the two biggest predictors and correlatives are lead pollution (see, Flint, MI) and Gini coefficient. God forbid we actually engage in any root-cause analysis, here. But it's not like the whole-ass job of those violent white supremacists I mentioned last paragraph, is to protect property, socioeconomic elites, and to violently enforce the status quo rather than serve the public and protect the common good.
You mean, other than the couple trillion bucks' worth of rare earth minerals in the geographically- and strategically-critical mountainous country that controls the only linkage between central and eastern Asia?I'd also note that Iraq or Afghanistan couldn't outlast the US if the US wanted to last. There wasn't any good reason to stay, beyond the sunk cost fallacy and national pride, so they left, which is not the case in the US.
Last edited: